|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
01-13-2019, 10:10 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Got Stripers
Glad to see you characterize it as the “issue” it is and not the national emergency the White House would like us to believe. I’d also suggest the reduced national security at our ports of entry due to disgruntled government workers is ironically happening over a shutdown over national security.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
So his words are what matter, whether it's a serious problem, a crisis, or an emergency? Do you agree that at best, it's a serious problem? The dems sure thought so until January 2017...and who here, criticized them for saying it was a crisis?
GS, I'm responding to you, but I don't mean to single you out, as you are usually thoughtful and fair. But your side has really jumped the shark on this one, you're tripping all over yourselves for the sake of saying Trump is wrong. That's ALL this is. If Hilary had won and wanted the wall, we'd have the wall.
And the arguments the Trump haters are clinging to, are just beyond absurd.
The wall can''t guarantee that illegal immigration won't converge to zero
We have other problems in addition to immigration
Walls are immoral, but fences are swell
Walls don't work (this is so stupid and demonstrably false, there aren't words to describe it)
Not every single illegal comes through the southern border
it's too expensive
illegals contribute positively to our economy
not everyone who gets murdered, is killed by an illegal
trump doesn't really care about the women getting raped
These arguments would get any high school student, a richly deserved 'F' in debate class.
If we didn't know for a certainty how well barriers worked in San Diego and Arizona, MAYBE there'd be two sides to this. But we do, so there aren't.
How many border patrol agents have you seen on TV, who aren't saying the wall will help? The guy who ran the border patrol under Obama, who was fired by Trump and therefore has reason to hate Trump, says it will help and is needed.
Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer know better? And what changed since 2013?
|
|
|
|
01-13-2019, 12:59 PM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,405
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
So his words are what matter, whether it's a serious problem, a crisis, or an emergency? Do you agree that at best, it's a serious problem? The dems sure thought so until January 2017...and who here, criticized them for saying it was a crisis?
GS, I'm responding to you, but I don't mean to single you out, as you are usually thoughtful and fair. But your side has really jumped the shark on this one, you're tripping all over yourselves for the sake of saying Trump is wrong. That's ALL this is. If Hilary had won and wanted the wall, we'd have the wall.
And the arguments the Trump haters are clinging to, are just beyond absurd.
The wall can''t guarantee that illegal immigration won't converge to zero
We have other problems in addition to immigration
Walls are immoral, but fences are swell
Walls don't work (this is so stupid and demonstrably false, there aren't words to describe it)
Not every single illegal comes through the southern border
it's too expensive
illegals contribute positively to our economy
not everyone who gets murdered, is killed by an illegal
trump doesn't really care about the women getting raped
These arguments would get any high school student, a richly deserved 'F' in debate class.
If we didn't know for a certainty how well barriers worked in San Diego and Arizona, MAYBE there'd be two sides to this. But we do, so there aren't.
How many border patrol agents have you seen on TV, who aren't saying the wall will help? The guy who ran the border patrol under Obama, who was fired by Trump and therefore has reason to hate Trump, says it will help and is needed.
Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer know better? And what changed since 2013?
|
and you still have yet to address why in 2 years and control of both houses no wall but as soon as dems take the house There is suddenly a crisis ...
All your effort has been to Support Trump by any lie or excuse necessary ... just like the russian thing I remember the outrage over the Jeremiah Wright controversy
But Putin and russia is all fake news LOL
|
|
|
|
01-14-2019, 10:41 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
and you still have yet to address why in 2 years and control of both houses no wall but as soon as dems take the house There is suddenly a crisis ...
All your effort has been to Support Trump by any lie or excuse necessary ... just like the russian thing I remember the outrage over the Jeremiah Wright controversy
But Putin and russia is all fake news LOL
|
"and you still have yet to address why in 2 years and control of both houses no wall "
I have said multiple times, that Trump and the GOP ,deserve a LOT of criticism for not doing a damn thing for two years. I don't know what else to say. I would happily endorse replacing these Republicans with ones who would have gotten that done. Many, many right-leaning voters are furious that they did nothing for two years. What else do you want me to say? It's not enough to make me switch parties, but it's enough for me to say they blew it and deserve to be replaced. Because they waited, innocent federal workers are getting hurt, and that's disgusting to me. Is that fair enough?
I answered that. Now perhaps YOU can show me the same courtesy, and tell us why all the democratic leaders were all for expanded barriers in 2006 and 2013, but no wall of a sudden, walls are immoral and don't work?
I haven't seen a single issue expose just how ineffective and ugly our political process has become. This is what happens when you vote for people based on how pretty and popular they are.
"All your effort has been to Support Trump by any lie or excuse "
You have serious, serious issues either with memory or comprehension, if you believe that.
" remember the outrage over the Jeremiah Wright controversy"
I was outraged over Obama's relationship with the deranged Wright. I didn't say Obama deserved to be impeached for it.
|
|
|
|
01-14-2019, 10:59 AM
|
#4
|
Ledge Runner Baits
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: I live in a house, but my soul is at sea.
Posts: 8,659
|
The Coast Guard is attempting to control the flow of boats, especially in areas in which illegal immigration is rampant, such as the waters next to San Diego and in parts of Florida. However, if one is truly concerned with security, especially with the inflow of terrorists, and you put such a high priority on a wall at our southern boarder and continued high security at legal ports of entry, think about how poorly our coasts are protected.
|
|
|
|
01-14-2019, 12:08 PM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,725
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Got Stripers
The Coast Guard is attempting to control the flow of boats, especially in areas in which illegal immigration is rampant, such as the waters next to San Diego and in parts of Florida. However, if one is truly concerned with security, especially with the inflow of terrorists, and you put such a high priority on a wall at our southern boarder and continued high security at legal ports of entry, think about how poorly our coasts are protected.
|
If we can also do a better job of protecting the coasts, we should.
|
|
|
|
01-14-2019, 11:19 AM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,405
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
"and you still have yet to address why in 2 years and control of both houses no wall "
I answered that. Now perhaps YOU can show me the same courtesy, and tell us why all the democratic leaders were all for expanded barriers in 2006 and 2013, but no wall of a sudden, walls are immoral and don't work?
I
|
It’s very simple in 2016 and 2013 they were negotiations and agreements and in the end signed by the potus
this wall funding demanded from Trimp is solely based on losing the midterm ... and being scolded by Ann and rush And using the shut down as cover That is what separates them
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
01-14-2019, 11:29 AM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
It’s very simple in 2016 and 2013 they were negotiations and agreements and in the end signed by the potus
this wall funding demanded from Trimp is solely based on losing the midterm ... and being scolded by Ann and rush And using the shut down as cover That is what separates them
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
you dodged, and i mean comoletely. why are the same folks who said recently we need a wall to address the crisis, now saying we don’t? what changed? why were the dems in favor of the wall then, but not
now? Answer - Trump.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
01-14-2019, 02:28 PM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,405
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
you dodged, and i mean comoletely. why are the same folks who said recently we need a wall to address the crisis, now saying we don’t? what changed? why were the dems in favor of the wall then, but not
now? Answer - Trump.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
You just keep looking for another angle to support Trump . So you think there was a national emergency in 2013 and 2016
Yet it went away in 2017 and 2018 no crisis but flared up again after the mid terms ... most here have been very consistent on why we are against the wall .. trump and company change daily
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
01-14-2019, 02:36 PM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
You just keep looking for another angle to support Trump . So you think there was a national emergency in 2013 and 2016
Yet it went away in 2017 and 2018 no crisis but flared up again after the mid terms ... most here have been very consistent on why we are against the wall .. trump and company change daily
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
not sure how skilled
you are at reading...the problem/crisis whatever has been there a long time. the gop has two years to get it done and failed, and they all deserve heavy, heavy criticism.
i also think the dems who did a 180 on this issue on the day trump took the oath, also should get
pink slips.
i was honestly critical of
my side, because they deserve it. can you do the same?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:14 PM.
|
| |