| |
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
| Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
09-20-2018, 05:50 AM
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F.
So apparently 13 other people besides you watched?
Some are concerned about the Trumplicans total submission while claiming we don’t really think it’s ok and don’t agree with everything but who’s gonna miss out on great head? We’re Getting what we want, so what if it’s ugly.
The morning will come sooner or later and you’ll be wishing you had chewed your arm off.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
i see you said absolutely nothing, about the irony i pointed out. when did hilary become concerned with victims is sexual assaults? Because she showed no such concern when she used her pulpit to attack her husbands victims, and there was dna evidence to show he was guilty, not just a witch hunt as might be the case here.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
|
|
|
|
|
09-20-2018, 09:20 AM
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,310
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
i see you said absolutely nothing, about the irony i pointed out. when did hilary become concerned with victims is sexual assaults? Because she showed no such concern when she used her pulpit to attack her husbands victims, and there was dna evidence to show he was guilty, not just a witch hunt as might be the case here.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
But you expect bad behavior out of Dems. So why aren't
the Rebub. setting a good example and having the FBI investigate (like they did w/A. Hill)? If either she or he lies to the FBI, prosecute them. If the FBI finds that there credible evidence/belief that K may have done what she claims, then have a hearing w/any witnesses both parties want to present. If they find she is crazy, say that and the vote can proceed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-20-2018, 10:11 AM
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
democrats are the perfect example of why you should never negotiate with terrorists
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-20-2018, 10:31 AM
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
But you expect bad behavior out of Dems. So why aren't
the Rebub. setting a good example and having the FBI investigate (like they did w/A. Hill)? If either she or he lies to the FBI, prosecute them. If the FBI finds that there credible evidence/belief that K may have done what she claims, then have a hearing w/any witnesses both parties want to present. If they find she is crazy, say that and the vote can proceed.
|
You dodged my question again, but I will show yo a courtesy you won't show me.
If I was Trump, I'd give 10 FBI agents a week to look into it, (which wouldn't be enough, they'd demand the investigation last until after the midterms) and that would be it, no more delays. If it turned up nothing, I'd be tempted to send the bill for the agents' time to the accuser, but wouldn't go that far.
Additional question, why in gods name didn't Feinstein ask the FBI to look into this, when she knew they were doing a background check on him? Spence has answered that question by saying they wanted to respect her privacy. Unfortunately for Spence, that weak argument is destroyed by the fact that the democrats are the ones who leaked her identity, to the press of all people. So they didn't want to share her identity with the FBI, but they gave it to the press? That makes all kinds of sense, I mean it's chock full of logic. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-20-2018, 11:22 AM
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,310
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
You dodged my question again, but I will show yo a courtesy you won't show me.
|
How did I dodge your question when I don't think you asked me a question? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-20-2018, 10:51 AM
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
But you expect bad behavior out of Dems. So why aren't
the Rebub. setting a good example and having the FBI investigate (like they did w/A. Hill)? If either she or he lies to the FBI, prosecute them. If the FBI finds that there credible evidence/belief that K may have done what she claims, then have a hearing w/any witnesses both parties want to present. If they find she is crazy, say that and the vote can proceed.
|
and the fbi has explicitly addressed that the investugatedbthe anita hill case. the fbi said Hills allegation wasn’t 35 years old, wasn’t missing all the details that Fords accusation is missing, and that Hill was eager to testify under oath. take it for what it’s worth, that’s what they’re saying.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-20-2018, 11:16 AM
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
the fbi also said this is typical mo for democrats
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-20-2018, 11:24 AM
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,310
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
and the fbi has explicitly addressed that the investugatedbthe anita hill case. the fbi said Hills allegation wasn’t 35 years old, wasn’t missing all the details that Fords accusation is missingand they got info how?, and that Hill was eager to testify under oath. take it for what it’s worth, that’s what they’re saying.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
So your saying the FBI doesn't want to investigate? They easily could be ordered to by the Pres. or the committee. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-20-2018, 05:22 PM
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
So your saying the FBI doesn't want to investigate? They easily could be ordered to by the Pres. or the committee.
|
I'm not saying that, the FBI said that. They have no interest in investigating a story this thin with so many holes. That's why they say they investigated the Anita Hill allegation, but took a pass on this. Now, Trump can order them to do it, which is why they asked for an FBI investigation (they can blame Trump for not ordering it), instead of asking the MD police to investigate, since it's their jurisdiction.
Sorry, here's my question...if a simple allegation is enough to disqualify Kavanaugh, why aren't all the liberals screaming for Keith Ellison to resign? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-21-2018, 07:44 AM
|
#10
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,310
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
Sorry, here's my question...if a simple allegation is enough to disqualify Kavanaugh, why aren't all the liberals screaming for Keith Ellison to resign?
|
I don't think this is enough to disqualify K - but have the FBI investigate and if there is enough there then have a hearing - with witnesses, evidence, etc.
Like they did w/A Hill. Orrin Hatch was in favor of it then but not now. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-20-2018, 12:05 PM
|
#11
|
|
Canceled
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: vt
Posts: 13,449
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
and the fbi has explicitly addressed that the investugatedbthe anita hill case. the fbi said Hills allegation wasn’t 35 years old, wasn’t missing all the details that Fords accusation is missing, and that Hill was eager to testify under oath. take it for what it’s worth, that’s what they’re saying.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Who in the FBI said this, and when and where?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Frasier: Niles, I’ve just had the most marvelous idea for a website! People will post their opinions, cheeky bon mots, and insights, and others will reply in kind!
Niles: You have met “people”, haven’t you?
Lets Go Darwin
|
|
|
|
09-20-2018, 12:50 PM
|
#12
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,496
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F.
Who in the FBI said this, and when and where?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
He made it up. All the FBI needs to investigate is a green light from POTUS. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-20-2018, 05:23 PM
|
#13
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
He made it up. All the FBI needs to investigate is a green light from POTUS.
|
No I'm not.
They don't need Trump's permission. He can order them to do it if they choose to pass, which they did, and they explained why. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-20-2018, 11:06 PM
|
#14
|
|
Canceled
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: vt
Posts: 13,449
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
No I'm not.
They don't need Trump's permission. He can order them to do it if they choose to pass, which they did, and they explained why.
|
Who and when
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Frasier: Niles, I’ve just had the most marvelous idea for a website! People will post their opinions, cheeky bon mots, and insights, and others will reply in kind!
Niles: You have met “people”, haven’t you?
Lets Go Darwin
|
|
|
|
|
09-20-2018, 11:11 PM
|
#16
|
|
Canceled
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: vt
Posts: 13,449
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
|
A criminal investigation and a background investigation are not the same thing
A senate hearing is not a court of law
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
Frasier: Niles, I’ve just had the most marvelous idea for a website! People will post their opinions, cheeky bon mots, and insights, and others will reply in kind!
Niles: You have met “people”, haven’t you?
Lets Go Darwin
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:52 AM.
|
| |
Hybrid Mode