| |
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
| Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
09-07-2018, 08:08 AM
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Libtardia
Posts: 21,709
|
I don’t think you grasp the situation in these hearings. Brett K could say he eats baby fetus and he would still be confirmed. Massive amounts of documents showing his past rulings have been bared from being used. You think that’s right? I don’t. And I’d yell like mad.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-07-2018, 08:14 AM
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebe
I don’t think you grasp the situation in these hearings. Brett K could say he eats baby fetus and he would still be confirmed. Massive amounts of documents showing his past rulings have been bared from being used. You think that’s right? I don’t. And I’d yell like mad.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
No, he wouldn't. But you can't derail a nomination because he's conservative and because Trump picked him. You need more than that.
Ask him questions about every ruling he has ever written, give him a chance to explain. That's what the hearings are supposed to be. Not having maniacs in the gallery getting arrested by the hundreds, not having woman dressed in red potato sacks for reasons I still don't understand, not shouting him down, and not Corey Booker grandstanding because he wants to make a run in 2020. Stop calling yourself Spartacus for releasing emails that were already published, that isn't all that heroic. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-07-2018, 09:55 AM
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,306
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
No, he wouldn't. But you can't derail a nomination because he's conservative and because Trump picked him. You need more than that.
|
How about finding emails that the Repubs. originally didn't want to release which directly contradict what he recently has been saying?
Or how about him not being on Trump's (the Fed. society) stated list of judges he would appt. then after the investigation begins his name now magically appears on the list and he moves to the top? Does his views on Pres. power, ect. have anything to do with that?
He will get confirmed regardless. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-07-2018, 11:27 AM
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
How about finding emails that the Repubs. originally didn't want to release which directly contradict what he recently has been saying?
Or how about him not being on Trump's (the Fed. society) stated list of judges he would appt. then after the investigation begins his name now magically appears on the list and he moves to the top? Does his views on Pres. power, ect. have anything to do with that?
He will get confirmed regardless.
|
No, it doesn't have anything to do with that, and you and I both know that, and here's how we know it. People were literally opposed to the pick, even before Trump announced who it was.
The left knows that unlike the Gorsuch selection, this process will shift the court. They can't handle it. Sorry, elections have consequences. You all loved the first guy to say that.
Sen Grassley is saying that the documents were available online, and that none of the senate democrats bothered to look at them. I don't know who is lying on that. I know that Booker lied about "releasing" classified emails, and he lied about the emails showing Kavanaugh to be a racist. So I think I know who I will give the benefit of the doubt too. And I don't always give it to Republicans, but I know enough about Booker and Blumenthal. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-07-2018, 12:07 PM
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,306
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
No, it doesn't have anything to do with that, and you and I both know that, and here's how we know it. People were literally opposed to the pick, even before Trump announced who it was.
|
No, it has everything to do with that - it looks like might have lied about his view on whether Roe v Wade is "settled law" or not and we don't know why he went from not being on the Federalist list to having Trump picking him.
Of course people were opposed to a pick from the other party. That has always been the way. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-07-2018, 04:58 PM
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
09-07-2018, 05:08 PM
|
#7
|
|
Certifiable Intertidal Anguiologist
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Somewhere between OOB & west of Watch Hill
Posts: 35,287
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
No, it doesn't have anything to do with that, and you and I both know that, and here's how we know it. People were literally opposed to the pick, even before Trump announced who it was.
|
You mean how the stop ****** for SCOTUS signs were already to go? |
~Fix the Bait~ ~Pogies Forever~
Striped Bass Fishing - All Stripers
Kobayashi Maru Election - there is no way to win.
Apocalypse is Coming:
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:20 AM.
|
| |
Hybrid Mode