Fear: Trump in the White House

[RIROCKHOUND]

.....

[scottw]

Originally Posted by RIROCKHOUND

.....

wasn't he saying that the media so adored obama that he/his white house could "get away" with attacking woodward?....anyone else would be pillaried by the media for attacking such an esteemed member...as trump and his whitehouse will be if they attack woodward and his credibility

[JohnR]

Interesting events - have not decided whether or not to get it.

That Mattis and Kelly state they did not say those things. I'd tend to believe them. We do have a Narcissistic in the WH, though. Seems to becoming a trend.


The bits on the "Nervous Breakdown" might be true? Sure as hell will sell books to the unhinged.

[Nebe]

Originally Posted by JohnR

Interesting events - have not decided whether or not to get it.

That Mattis and Kelly state they did not say those things. I'd tend to believe them. We do have a Narcissistic in the WH, though. Seems to becoming a trend.


The bits on the "Nervous Breakdown" might be true? Sure as hell will sell books to the unhinged.

When you have Rex tillerson saying trump is a “#^&#^&#^&#^&ing mooron” in front of multiple people and then denying it, I believe this book a hell of a lot more than these guys back tracking and denying it...
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by JohnR

That Mattis and Kelly state they did not say those things. I'd tend to believe them.

If they don't deny the remarks they pretty much are resigned to quitting so I could easily see two men with integrity doing what they think is in the interest of the country.

What's so disturbing about the book is the reoccurring theme of good people around the president working to protect the USA from Trump's leadership.

[scottw]

Originally Posted by spence

What's so disturbing about the book is the reoccurring theme of good people around the president working to protect the USA from Trump's leadership.

like John said...should sell well to the whacko left

[spence]

Originally Posted by scottw

like John said...should sell well to the whacko left

I thought John was thinking of picking up a copy?

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

If they don't deny the remarks they pretty much are resigned to quitting so I could easily see two men with integrity doing what they think is in the interest of the country.

What's so disturbing about the book is the reoccurring theme of good people around the president working to protect the USA from Trump's leadership.

Shocking, that you decided to conclude that their denials are fake. We're all stunned.

[scottw]

catchy book title....

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

Shocking, that you decided to conclude that their denials are fake. We're all stunned.

If your news source is Fox, it has to all be make believe or just ask John Barron. The media is all involved in a plot to dethrone Trump.
"But what's truly worrisome for President Trump and his administration is that the portrait Woodward paints of a chaotic, dysfunctional, ill-prepared White House is all strangely familiar. It's the same vision of the White House that Michael Wolff wrote way back in January in "Fire and Fury." It's the same picture that Omarosa Manigault-Newman constructed in her memoir of her year in the White House. It's the same story that White House reporters at CNN, The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal and virtually every other mainstream media outlet have told of the Trump White House.
Sure, Omarosa could be a disgruntled former aide trying to make money while exacting revenge on her enemies. Sure, Michael Wolff could have been misled by a few sources with scores to settle with Trump. Sure, reporters could get a detail or two wrong. Sure, Woodward could have cast a scene or two in ways that are less than favorable to Trump.
But how could all -- and I mean all -- of the reporting on this White House reach a striking similar conclusion? The portraits of Trump drawn by Wolff, Omarosa and Woodward are all eerily similar to one another -- a man hopelessly out of his depth in the job, but entirely incapable of understanding how desperately out of depth he actually is. A man motivated almost entirely by personal grievance. A man willing to humiliate people who work for him, to play staffers against one another, to scapegoat underlings to keep blame off of himself. Someone who has so much self-belief that he rarely adequately prepares for situations involving international diplomacy and national security. Top aides who view that their jobs are primarily keeping Trump from causing serious harm, and grousing every step of the way about the man.
The consistency in those storylines is virtually impossible to explain in any other way than this: It's true. To believe otherwise, you have to convince yourself that not only the entire daily media but also the likes of Wolff and Woodward all got together and agreed on how to portray Trump across tweets, stories and books. Which is, of course, beyond ridiculous."

[scottw]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

If your news source is Fox,

YAWN....

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by scottw

YAWN....

Documented lies of Donald Trump: since in office 4720 and counting
Documented lies of Bob Woodward since his career began: zero

You choose who to believe.

[spence]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

Shocking, that you decided to conclude that their denials are fake. We're all stunned.

It’s logical
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device