|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
08-20-2018, 06:03 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,481
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by detbuch
Apparently, many do see it as intimidation. I certainly can't disprove that. Can you? The Judge has gotten threats and has U.S. Marshal protection. The jury was scared. I don't think it is a stretch to say that many can see, and do, that revealing the juror's names and addresses would be intimidating in light of threats already being made.
|
Where is a first hand report of the jury being scared?
Quote:
And the jury is not sequestered, so it could have heard about the request to post their names and addresses. And the media requested the info AT THE LATEST immediately after the verdict. So, possibly, before that.
|
How is that in any way trying to influence the Jury?
|
|
|
|
08-20-2018, 06:25 PM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Where is a first hand report of the jury being scared?
How is that in any way trying to influence the Jury?
|
it's like the mafia letting them know they're being watched and they know where they live...typical leftist intimidation tactics lately...plenty of examples
|
|
|
|
08-20-2018, 06:31 PM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,725
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Where is a first hand report of the jury being scared?
The judge said so. I don't know how many hands were involved. But he is pretty close to the jury's concerns.
How is that in any way trying to influence the Jury?
|
The word being used was "intimidation." Not everyone is as self-assured, brave, with nerves of steel as you. My understanding is that the locality in which the trial is being held is anti-Trump. I can see how a juror wouldn't want some hot-head looney in that community to know his name and address if the verdict was not guilty. It might influence a juror to decide that discretion is the better part of valor, and discretely vote for conviction.
|
|
|
|
08-20-2018, 06:47 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,481
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by detbuch
The word being used was "intimidation." Not everyone is as self-assured, brave, with nerves of steel as you. My understanding is that the locality in which the trial is being held is anti-Trump. I can see how a juror wouldn't want some hot-head looney in that community to know his name and address if the verdict was not guilty. It might influence a juror to decide that discretion is the better part of valor, and discretely vote for conviction.
|
The judge didn't say anything about juror intimidation, he said he had personally received threats. I'm all for keeping them private for now but I would fear more from Trump supporters than I would from the media.
|
|
|
|
08-20-2018, 07:02 PM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
The judge didn't say anything about juror intimidation, .
|
from the POLITICO article....for the second time
" the judge overseeing the case alluded to "threats" the jury may be receiving.
“I had no idea this case would incite this emotion,” U.S. District Court Judge T.S. Ellis III said in an open court hearing, responding to a motion from seven news organizations, including POLITICO, seeking access to sealed materials related to the trial that would have publicly identified the jurors.
Ellis denied the motion, telling the courtroom that jurors were "scared” and “afraid.” As a result, Ellis said, he didn’t “feel right” releasing the names of the 12-person jury.
|
|
|
|
08-20-2018, 07:18 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,481
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw
from the POLITICO article....for the second time
" the judge overseeing the case alluded to "threats" the jury may be receiving.
“I had no idea this case would incite this emotion,” U.S. District Court Judge T.S. Ellis III said in an open court hearing, responding to a motion from seven news organizations, including POLITICO, seeking access to sealed materials related to the trial that would have publicly identified the jurors.
Ellis denied the motion, telling the courtroom that jurors were "scared” and “afraid.” As a result, Ellis said, he didn’t “feel right” releasing the names of the 12-person jury.
|
Name one specific juror threat.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
08-20-2018, 07:24 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Name one specific juror threat.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
ask the judge dummy
|
|
|
|
08-20-2018, 08:15 PM
|
#8
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Georgetown MA
Posts: 18,206
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
I'm all for keeping them private for now but I would fear more from Trump supporters than I would from the media.
|
Yes, the media is the problem...
You should repeat what you are about to post in front of the mirror and see if your own eyes roll before you submit reply
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
"If you're arguing with an idiot, make sure he isn't doing the same thing."
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:06 PM.
|
| |