Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
I think the only people who have gone off the deep end are trying to make a case that bc GPS was paid for by the Dems, the doc. isn't credible.
|
I don't think anyone said it's not credible "because the dems paid for it"...it's credibility has come under question for other reasons mentioned below...the fact that the dems paid for it
and worked in conjunction with the highly politicized obama justice department and FBI to undermine the American election process is what is truly troubling...
if you replace "republicans" with "democrats"...you guys would be screaming
FASCISM!!!
again, since you guys can't seem to process ...
"Obama intelligence officials anxiously adopted Christopher Steele’s allegations of traitorous conduct by then-candidate Donald Trump rather than first subject his “dossier” to rigorous investigation — even though Steele himself admits that his “
raw,” “
unverified” reports might not be true. Second, at the same time the FBI was receiving Steele’s reports — which were based on
multiple-hearsay from anonymous Russian sources, and paid for by the Clinton campaign — Obama intelligence officials were briefing congressional leaders about them, thereby ensuring that they’d be publicized just six weeks before Election Day."
"none of the work product that the Free Beacon received appears in the Steele dossier. The Free Beacon had no knowledge of or connection to the Steele dossier, did not pay for the dossier, and never had contact with, knowledge of, or provided payment for any work performed by Christopher Steele."
vote? how does BBC vote?
Hybrid Mode
