Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
I feel like I'm talking to a liberal too. You are claiming I am saying things, that bear no resemblance to anything I have ever said.
"you act as there are no gun laws"
If it's unconstitutional to impose restrictions to the second amendment for the sake of public safety, why is it considered not unconstitutional to impose restrictions to other amendments for the sake of public safety?
In what way am I acting as if there are no laws? Of course there are laws. In my opinion, they can be improved. In fact, I am very confident they can be improve din a way which (1) saves a few lives (but doesn't eliminate 100% of gun violence, obviously), and (2) doesn't trample on the intent of the second amendment. That's all I am saying. I'm not saying the earth is flat...
|
:kewl you seem upset that I'm not a hysterical as you
I agreed with regard to bump stocks....limit the number of guns?...he had a bunch but only used "two" I believe
restrictions "to the second amendment" can not stop people from doing evil acts...just as "restrictions to the 1st"...cannot stop someone from yelling fire in a theater(talk about tired arguments)
that is why Rights come with Responsibilities...not restrictions.....restrictions are a joke to someone lacking responsibility....restrictions mainly restrict those that are already responsible
Freedom is exercising your inalienable Rights with Responsibility....I think socialism might be exercising the rights they allow you *with restrictions
you have yet to offer any "restrictions" that would have prevented the shooting in Vegas...
can you identify a few restrictions to other amendments for the sake of public safety? I'm just curious
Threaded Mode