WWHD

[The Dad Fisherman]

Originally Posted by wdmso

there are no security implications the deed and any damage is already done and the policy has been changed and we know what did happen in Benghazi and what didn't happen .. or do we need another investigation

Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.

I will wait for the outcome of the investigation on the emails and accept the findings
will others ?

we'll have to wait and see .. but if past history is any indicator I dont hold out much hope

I love how all the Hillary fans hang their hats on it not being illegal (yet)..

Was it careless - yes
Was it irresponsible -yes
Was it self serving - yes
Was it illegal - TBD

Just the qualities I want in the next president.....a self-serving, careless, irresponsible person who likes to work the loopholes.....

What she did was wrong.....period. She bypassed safeguards for her own convenience.Doesn't matter what the FBI finds.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman

I love how all the Hillary fans hang their hats on it not being illegal (yet)..

Well, to be fair to Hillary I haven't seen any evidence of illegal behavior on her part.

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by spence

Well, to be fair to Hillary I haven't seen any evidence of illegal behavior on her part.

Perhaps, the FBI has seen some evidence. Or does the FBI investigate when there is no evidence for investigating?

[spence]

Originally Posted by detbuch

Or does the FBI investigate when there is no evidence for investigating?

The FBI didn't launch an investigation because they saw evidence of wrongdoing, the investigation was in response to a security referral by the IG over the potential for mishandling of information. That's an important distinction.

[buckman]

Originally Posted by spence

The FBI didn't launch an investigation because they saw evidence of wrongdoing, the investigation was in response to a security referral by the IG over the potential for mishandling of information. That's an important distinction.

I'm sure the 82 special agents are paying attention to that distinction .
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by buckman

I'm sure the 82 special agents are paying attention to that distinction .
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

There are not 82 special agents on this case, you got duped by a long since corrected piece of sloppy reporting.

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by spence

The FBI didn't launch an investigation because they saw evidence of wrongdoing, the investigation was in response to a security referral by the IG over the potential for mishandling of information. That's an important distinction.

Isn't "mishandling of information" doing something wrong?

[scottw]

Originally Posted by spence

Well, to be fair to Hillary I haven't seen any evidence of illegal behavior on her part.

nor would you ever ...blind partisanship

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman

I love how all the Hillary fans hang their hats on it not being illegal (yet)..

Was it careless - yes
Was it irresponsible -yes
Was it self serving - yes
Was it illegal - TBD

Just the qualities I want in the next president.....a self-serving, careless, irresponsible person who likes to work the loopholes.....

What she did was wrong.....period. She bypassed safeguards for her own convenience.Doesn't matter what the FBI finds.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Yes, it's amazing how not doing something "illegal" qualifies Hillary for President even though what she did was "wrong." Of course, when other past Presidents who were not of Hillary's political persuasions did wrong but not illegal stuff, that was sufficient to make them incompetent, unqualified, stupid, bad, and not worthy of the office.

But, we have to understand Progressive's use of Orwellian Newspeak. When applied to a Progressive, doing wrong is not wrong doing.

[spence]

Originally Posted by detbuch

Yes, it's amazing how not doing something "illegal" qualifies Hillary for President even though what she did was "wrong." Of course, when other past Presidents who were not of Hillary's political persuasions did wrong but not illegal stuff, that was sufficient to make them incompetent, unqualified, stupid, bad, and not worthy of the office.

There are varying degrees of everything. Does being arrested disqualify someone for office? Didn't disqualify Bush.

Really I think one of the most important factors is intent. If Clinton was simply trying to perform under incredibly challenging circumstances people will largely give her a pass.

[buckman]

Originally Posted by spence

If Clinton was simply trying to perform under incredibly challenging circumstances people will largely give her a pass.

😂😂😂😂😂 That one will go down as a Spence Top Ten
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by buckman

😂😂😂😂😂 That one will go down as a Spence Top Ten
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

That's right, because she's a Bond villain. I had forgot about that.

[buckman]

Originally Posted by spence

That's right, because she's a Bond villain. I had forgot about that.

3.5 hour interview with the FBI today. I'm sure she lied somewhere during that interview . I don't think she could help her self
Good bye Clintons
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by buckman

3.5 hour interview with the FBI today. I'm sure she lied somewhere during that interview . I don't think she could help her self
Good bye Clintons
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Yes, because she's eeeeevvvvvvvvvvvvvviiiiiiiiiiiiillllllllllllllllll lll...

Note she wasn't even subpoenaed. There's nothing there...

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by spence

That's right, because she's a Bond villain. I had forgot about that.

Actually, Bond villains are more transparent and honest than she is.