Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Is Clinton citing specific religious beliefs that are shaping her position on issues of public policy regarding abortion or gay marriage?
Are the Media, Clinton, progressive government, shaping the "issues" in order to create "public policy"? And, if so (yes they are), under what authority are they allowed to dictate outside of constitutionally enumerated power?
What does it matter if she believes in the Rapture if this belief has no bearing on the issues at hand?
|
It would matter if she has a hand in creating the "issues at hand." And it would be a despotic grab of power if she were to be a conspirator in promoting law which deprives individuals of their right to free speech or their ability to practice or not practice a religion of their choice.
If the government is the sole creator of the "issues at hand," and if all "issues" are the domain of the federal government, and if the President can legally determine the outcome of any issue and can enforce her opinion regarding all issues, then what she believes about the Rapture will have a bearing on "the issues at hand.
That can only be in a progressively unlimited federal government. That cannot be in a government bounded by the U.S. Constitution. One is the essence of tyranny. The other is the protector of individual liberty.
Threaded Mode