Missouri

[RIROCKHOUND]

Originally Posted by RIROCKHOUND

Agreed. If thats how the facts play out, it was justified. From what I have read, a lot of information has not been released yet, and a lot of questions remain.

I know nothing of this Mel Robbins woman, but it summarizes some of the holes in the story, and the two wildly conflicting accounts. Again, it might all play out exactly as the police office stated, but issues remain that need to be clarified.


http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/18/opinio...ing/index.html

[buckman]

Originally Posted by RIROCKHOUND

I know nothing of this Mel Robbins woman, but it summarizes some of the holes in the story, and the two wildly conflicting accounts. Again, it might all play out exactly as the police office stated, but issues remain that need to be clarified.


http://www.cnn.com/2014/08/18/opinio...ing/index.html

Don't take this the wrong way Brian but the article you linked is a complete piece of crap . It is full of misinformation . She is outraged that the state is investigating this and haven't made all the facts public ???? It's an investigation and one needs to be very careful . There won't be an indictment because my guess is the only guilty party is dead , however lawyers being lawyers , there will be a civil suit . ( extortion / payoff )
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device