Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating

     

Left Nav S-B Home FAQ Members List S-B on Facebook Arcade WEAX Tides Buoys Calendar Today's Posts Right Nav

Left Container Right Container
 

Go Back   Striper Talk Striped Bass Fishing, Surfcasting, Boating » Striper Chat - Discuss stuff other than fishing ~ The Scuppers and Political talk » Political Threads

Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi:

 
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 06-12-2014, 06:51 AM   #1
PaulS
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
PaulS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,306
I'm still waiting for the Rs to have more hearings to determine whether we were told the biggest lie of the 21st. century or if it was the biggest intelligence failure of the 21st century.
PaulS is offline  
Old 06-12-2014, 07:16 AM   #2
detbuch
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,725
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS View Post
I'm still waiting for the Rs to have more hearings to determine whether we were told the biggest lie of the 21st. century or if it was the biggest intelligence failure of the 21st century.
The Rs are probably afraid that Spence will trash them by calling it all old news.
detbuch is offline  
Old 06-12-2014, 08:43 AM   #3
Jim in CT
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS View Post
I'm still waiting for the Rs to have more hearings to determine whether we were told the biggest lie of the 21st. century or if it was the biggest intelligence failure of the 21st century.
Well, the Dems controlled Congress during the end of Bush's term, so it stands to reason that if anyone thought anyone lied, they would have been responsible.

If believing that Iraq had WMDs is indicative of lying or failure, I assume that you won't be voting for Hilary Clinton, because she said she was certain they had WMDs, and she voted in favor of the war.

There was an awful lot of evidence that led a lot of liberals to believe they had WMDs. Hindsight it always 20/20, isn't it?
Jim in CT is offline  
Old 06-12-2014, 10:41 AM   #4
PaulS
Registered User
iTrader: (0)
 
PaulS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,306
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT View Post
Well, the Dems controlled Congress during the end of Bush's term, so it stands to reason that if anyone thought anyone lied, they would have been responsible.

If believing that Iraq had WMDs is indicative of lying or failure, I assume that you won't be voting for Hilary Clinton, because she said she was certain they had WMDs, and she voted in favor of the war.

There was an awful lot of evidence that led a lot of liberals to believe they had WMDs. Hindsight it always 20/20, isn't it?
I always laugh at the line that people who voted in favor of war (based on either a huge lie or a huge failure) should be held to that vote.

So what was it - a huge intelligence failure or a huge lie?
PaulS is offline  
Old 06-12-2014, 11:55 AM   #5
Jim in CT
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS View Post
I always laugh at the line that people who voted in favor of war (based on either a huge lie or a huge failure) should be held to that vote.

So what was it - a huge intelligence failure or a huge lie?
Hilary (and many other Dems) saw the same evidence that Bush and his staff did, and came to the same conclusion. Now, if Bush manufactured evidence to pursuade the Senate Democrats, she should not be held accountable (and he would have been impeached and prosecuted). If what she saw was an honest presentation of available evidence, then she reached the same wrong conclusion that Bush did.

It was an intelligence failure. Hilary, in particular, had said that she (and he hubby) were certain that Iraq had WMDs.

Hilary took it further and told Gen Petreus (when he told the senate the benefits he though tthe surge could bring) that to believe what the general was saying, "requires the willful suspension of disbelief." In other words, she told Petreus he was lying about what h ethought the Surge could do.

Once again, Hilary was absolutely wrong, because the Surge worked beautifully. Unlike being wrong about WMDs, she was in a minority of people who denied the Surge could work. And she's qualified to be POTUS?
Jim in CT is offline  
Old 06-12-2014, 09:05 PM   #6
detbuch
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,725
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS View Post
I'm still waiting for the Rs to have more hearings to determine whether we were told the biggest lie of the 21st. century or if it was the biggest intelligence failure of the 21st century.
Why have those hearings when Joe Biden said to Larry King in 2010 that Iraq could be one of the Obama administration's greatest achievements:

"I am very optimistic about -- about Iraq. I mean, this could be one of the great achievements of this administration. You're going to see 90,000 American troops come marching home by the end of the summer. You're going to see a stable government in Iraq that is actually moving toward a representative government.

I spent -- I've been there 17 times now. I go about every two months -- three months. I know every one of the major players in all the segments of that society. It's impressed me. I've been impressed how they have been deciding to use the political process rather than guns to settle their differences."

I guess Obama decided to turn his back on his great achievement.
detbuch is offline  
 

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin. Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Please use all necessary and proper safety precautions. STAY SAFE Striper Talk Forums
Copyright 1998-20012 Striped-Bass.com