| |
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
| Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
02-06-2014, 03:12 PM
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,444
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
So I'm guessing he didn't read the report. Heard about it on Fox news?
Yes, I know what a subsidy is and I know what the report said were the reasons for the decrease in people working.
|
Paul, what do you really think of a government program that effectively encourages 2.5 million people to voluntarily cut back to less than full time, so that they can receive public assistance? Isn't that a BAD thing? How could that not be considered a bad thing? This is by far Obama's most significant achievement, and the effect is to encourage people to be less productive, and to make people more reliant on the feds? |
|
|
|
|
|
02-06-2014, 03:46 PM
|
#2
|
|
Keep The Change
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: The Road to Serfdom
Posts: 3,275
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
make people more reliant on the feds?
|
This is the most important point of your explanation and precisely why Obama wanted so desperately to pass Nationalized Healthcare. |
“It’s not up to the courts to invent new minorities that get special protections,” Antonin Scalia
|
|
|
|
|
02-06-2014, 03:57 PM
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,316
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fishpart
This is the most important point of your explanation and precisely why Obama wanted so desperately to pass Nationalized Healthcare.
|
So that was the goal?  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-06-2014, 05:35 PM
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,444
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
So that was the goal? |
To get more people dependent on the feds, and therefore more people who vote for dems. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-06-2014, 06:07 PM
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,316
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
To get more people dependent on the feds, and therefore more people who vote for dems.
|
That is a joke so I'm out,
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-06-2014, 06:43 PM
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,444
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
That is a joke so I'm out,
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Don't let the doorknob hit you on the way out. Why are most liberals opposed to something as obvious as securing our borders? Same reason, they want to put more dependent folks on the voting rolls. Paul, I asked if you thought it was good policy to incentivize millions to freely impoverish themselves and get on the public dole? You dodged that, I see. Gee, anyone care to venture a guess why you chose not to answer?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device |
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-06-2014, 07:14 PM
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Gloucester Massachusetts
Posts: 2,678
|
I can understand why 800 thou or 2 million may drop out that is if they earn up to 400% of the federal poverty level....but if their income risers above, their sudsidy will decrease and if they make over the poverty level they would see their insurance rise so I could see where this would discourage working and staying under the fed guide line.
Every county in the country will have a different poverty level I do believe....I may be a little confused since this was not mentioned on fox to my knowledge...I will have to stop watching Restaurant Impossible to catch up on the truth...LOL
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:29 AM.
|
| |
Hybrid Mode