dont be dissin the Big O!

[PaulS]

If it's a Dem. senator saying anything about the actions of a Repub. pres., he's anti-American and giving comfort to the enemy. If it is someone saying anything against a Dem. pres., it's his right. The hypocrisy is hilarious.

[scottw]

Originally Posted by PaulS

If it's a Dem. senator saying anything about the actions of a Repub. pres., he's anti-American and giving comfort to the enemy. If it is someone saying anything against a Dem. pres., it's his right. The hypocrisy is hilarious.

you mean like...Harry Reid stating "the surge has failed and the war is lost" on the floor of the senate while troops are fighting ?...yeah, almost exactly alike...some hypocricy...you didn't read the article did you? the capability of the troops is not in question, it's the competence, or better..incompetence of this president and those that he has determining the strategy which ties the hands of the troops as they are watching their friends die unnecessarily

read George Will's recent column on rules of engagement...oh, I forgot, you don't read...sorry

[PaulS]

Actually what I don't read is most of your posts b/c I find you (and a few others) to be poisonous and filled with hate (which I actually think is quite sad). Hopefully, your not.

So the troops are no longer fighting? I guess you can not criticize the troops but can criticize the commander in chief - ok, I understand the difference now. I thought that was insubordination????

Your right, I didn't read the article and frankly from what I heard, didn't think what he said was that bad. I was pointing out the hypocrisy of people who flip flop depending what party they are talking about.

[scottw]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Actually what I don't read is most of your posts b/c I find you (and a few others) to be poisonous and filled with hate (which I actually think is quite sad). Hopefully, your not. someone needs to look in the mirror

So the troops are no longer fighting? yes, with one hand tied behind their back... I guess you can not criticize the troops but can criticize the commander in chief exactly, the cic is ultimately responsible for the troops and not the other way around ..get it???- ok, I understand the difference now.:rotf2I I don't think you do: I thought that was insubordination???? when someone is restricting your ability to keep yourself from being killed, someone ought to speak up, it's not the troops fault people like you elected such an incompetent

Your right, I didn't read the article and frankly from what I heard, try reading, it's not that long and then you might actually know what you are talking about...at least a little bit for once... didn't think what he said was that bad. I was pointing out the hypocrisy of people who flip flop depending what party they are talking about.

you failed

[PaulS]

I don't think I'm filled with hate but if you think so, I'll take that under advisement.

[scottw]

Originally Posted by PaulS

I don't think I'm filled with hate but if you think so, I'll take that under advisement.

you amuse me