Biden is a complete dope.

[scottw]

Originally Posted by spence

Economists expected job losses to continue well into 2010. really???, then why are job reports that show losses always termed "unexpected"?Many also believe that the stimulus has certainly helped to curb this decline...by creating jobs.many???, that would the Obamorons

Even the CBO says the stimulus has created jobs.

-spence

hey Spence, wasn't Biden the guy that you were originally supporting for president in the primaries?

[spence]

Originally Posted by scottw

really???, then why are job reports that show losses always termed "unexpected"?

They're not.

-spence

[scottw]

Originally Posted by spence

They're not.

-spence

they are...

Unemployment Rates Drops Despite Unexpected Job Losses
MarketMinute.com Market UpdatesPublished: 02/05/10 08:49 AM

Despite an unexpected loss of 20,000 jobs in January, the unemployement rate dropped to 9.7%, the lowest level in five months. The markets opened lower with the Dow falling 49 points to 9952 while Nasdaq lost 7 points to 2117.

if you are correct(Economists expected job losses to continue well into 2010) this should say "expected" job losses

[spence]

Originally Posted by scottw

they are...

Your comment was that job "losses" were always labeled as "unexpected" which is not true.

-spence

[scottw]

:

Originally Posted by spence

Your comment was that job "losses" were always labeled as "unexpected" which is not true.

-spence

haaaaa.......you are the last person on the planet that ought correct someone for a sweeping generality

I just Googled "expected job losses"....the only use of that prase is within "greater than expected job losses"

Obamanomics 101