Biden tanks in polls

[Jim in CT]

wayne, one last time. which kills waaay more black victims, white cops or black on black crime.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

wayne, one last time. which kills waaay more black victims, white cops or black on black crime.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

It's an irrelevant question.

[Got Stripers]

Originally Posted by spence

It's an irrelevant question.

Not when Jim gets his needle stuck and Wayne asking Scott for anything other than his one line snarky standard is why this board is just an amusement at times.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

It's an irrelevant question.

only to a huge intellectual
coward.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

only to a huge intellectual.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Fixed

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

Fixed

oh yeah, which is why you ran away and hid under your bed when i asked, you’re a pure intellectual for sure, totally objective and neutral.

still haven’t answered. that’s what an intellectual
does?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

oh yeah, which is why you ran away and hid under your bed when i asked, you’re a pure intellectual for sure, totally objective and neutral.

still haven’t answered. that’s what an intellectual
does?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Jim, you ask pretty banal questions.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

Jim, you ask pretty banal questions.

And you give swell answers, like

the capital police officer was beaten to death.

Warren didn't flip any foreclosures.

Teachers contracts don't guarantee that all teachers with the same seniority and credentials get the same pay.

Those are some real gems.

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

wayne, one last time. which kills waaay more black victims, white cops or black on black crime.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I take it you didn’t read the story of the link I provided …. It’s clearly answers your question

Here it is again Stop using ‘black-on-black’ crime to deflect away from police brutality

https://www.cleveland.com/news/2020/...brutality.html


PS I am not Black nor do I chose to speak for the black community about what issues impact them in a positive or negative way ..

Nor do I try to base my arguments on such a simplistic comparison of who’s the better killer

Not just “a few bad apples”: U.S. police kill civilians at much higher rates than other countries
Police violence is a systemic problem in the U.S., not simply incidental, and it happens on a scale far greater than other wealthy nations.

It’s seem you can’t discuss 2 different issues at the same time.. oh well
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

I take it you didn’t read the story of the link I provided …. It’s clearly answers your question

Here it is again Stop using ‘black-on-black’ crime to deflect away from police brutality

https://www.cleveland.com/news/2020/...brutality.html


PS I am not Black nor do I chose to speak for the black community about what issues impact them in a positive or negative way ..

Nor do I try to base my arguments on such a simplistic comparison of who’s the better killer

Not just “a few bad apples”: U.S. police kill civilians at much higher rates than other countries
Police violence is a systemic problem in the U.S., not simply incidental, and it happens on a scale far greater than other wealthy nations.

It’s seem you can’t discuss 2 different issues at the same time.. oh well
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

i can discuss two issues, we can talk about actual police brutality. but you refuse to talk about black on black crime, even though it claims a thousand times more black lives than white cops.

you’re the one who can’t discuss two things. not me.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

i can discuss two issues, we can talk about actual police brutality. but you refuse to talk about black on black crime, even though it claims a thousand times more black lives than white cops.

you’re the one who can’t discuss two things. not me.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Jim when you use your black on black crime line to distract from talking about police brutality.

It’s like making sugar cookies then throwing in a handful of chocolate chips .. and saying I didn’t change anything it’s still a cookie

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Originally Posted by wdmso

It’s like making sugar cookies then throwing in a handful of chocolate chips .. and saying I didn’t change anything it’s still a cookie

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

this sounds racist

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by scottw

this sounds racist

Actually I thought the same thing after I posted. It ..
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Jim when you use your black on black crime line to distract from talking about police brutality.

It’s like making sugar cookies then throwing in a handful of chocolate chips .. and saying I didn’t change anything it’s still a cookie

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

i’m not mentioning black on black crime to deflect away from the police. people
with IQs above 65 can think about two things at once. im sorry if you don’t fall into that category.

but we can prioritize.

i mention black on black crime ( and the fact that the left refuses to discuss it) to prove that the left doesn’t really care about black lives. the left is only interested in black deaths which help them win elections, and only deaths at the hands of white cops ( a minuscule percentage of black homicide victims) help
democrats win elections.

Democrats want blacks to stay right where they are. in the cities, in huge numbers, completely dependent on government to survive, with no hope of large scale upward economic mobility. because democrats are afraid if they all
move into the middle class, they’ll vote republican. democrats have replaced 1830s plantations with today’s failing cities. and any black who dares wander off the reservation to identify as a republican, s branded an uncle tom sellout. try making that wrong.

Thats why democrats like all you here, refuse to talk about black on black crime, and things like fatherlessness, which is by far the first thing that needs to be addressed. it’s why you’re all opposed to school choice, despite referring to yourself as pro choice, an idiotic title to bestie upon yourselves. you desperately want them to fail to thrive, so they can remain a reliable
voting block.

liberals see what’s going on in the cities today, and conclude blacks need more of the same. conservatives look at what’s going on in the cities and say that what we’re doing isn’t working, these people deserve better. which is obviously why we advocate for school choice.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

conservatives look at what’s going on in the cities and say that what we’re doing isn’t working, these people deserve better. which is obviously why we advocate for school choice.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Just NIMBY

As you said before:
“No, because many people work their butts off to be able to move from Hartford to West Hartford specifically for the schools, and they deserve that.”
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

Just NIMBY

As you said before:
“No, because many people work their butts off to be able to move from Hartford to West Hartford specifically for the schools, and they deserve that.”
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

who says not in my backyard? that may be your instinctive reaction, and it’s probably a big reason why liberals oppose school choice. That’s your racism, keep it to yourself please.

i clarified my comment you posted ( you conveniently forgot that) to say that i’m opposed to forcing suburb kids to go to school in the cities. i’m all in favor of getting good students out of the cities failing schools and into good schools. liberals are the ones who oppose that. conservatives love it.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

i’m not mentioning black on black crime to deflect away from the police. people
with IQs above 65 can think about two things at once. im sorry if you don’t fall into that category.


Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

ok jim you win i can't defeat your idiocy next time we talk about a topic .. I'll start talking about tuna fishing even if it's not relevant .. Just to prove . I can talk about 2 different things at the same time

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

ok jim you win i can't defeat your idiocy next time we talk about a topic .. I'll start talking about tuna fishing even if it's not relevant .. Just to prove . I can talk about 2 different things at the same time

According to Spence, 13 unarmed blacks were killed by cops in 2019. According to the FBI, 8,600 blacks were homicide victims in 2020/

I say we should work to address police brutality and black on black crime, but that we should allocate resources and energy to those problems according to the magnitude of each issue. One issue claims 660 times more black lives than the other.

You say it's "idiocy" to give any weight to the difference in magnitude of those crises. You are entitled to that opinion.