Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
That would assume the situation was ripe for fraud. The evidence doesn't appear to prove that's the case.
What you're saying is that you want legislation that would expand the regulatory power of government in a manner not congruent with the Costitution.
According to Detbuch's other thread you're supporting liberal policy.
-spence
|
"That would assume the situation was ripe for fraud. The evidence doesn't appear to prove that's the case. "
We have all seen sporadic cases of voter fraud, small scale stuff. Since you are the one who is saying that probate and voter fraud are sufficiently difefrent that one should require proof of id and one should not, where is
your proof that there is large-scale indntity theft when it comes to claiming inheritances?
"you want legislation that would expand the regulatory power of government in a manner not congruent with the Costitution."
Requiring an id is unconstitutional? Please explain that?
Threaded Mode