|
Wow. I had a typo. I added an extra B. I should know better than hit 'view post' from an ignored poster
She has been a campaigning, bible thumping Christian her entire career (who is cute, 41 and unmarried, claims to adhere to her faith 100%, hence my question if she was a virgin).
I'm not trying to define anything. The point RIJ was making was that the Tea party was a fairly centrist movement, My point back was that she is not a centrist candidate, so it makes it hard for me to view the tea party as a 'centrist' movement when this is who they back.
A good point on Morning Joe this AM before I left the house, and just a comment.
If O'Donnell was a chubby, middle aged, bald, male candidate, who lied in the past about his college experience, had home foreclosures, was pursuing seemingly frivolous lawsuits, who once claimed she couldn't because of her faith, lie to Nazi's about hiding a Jew in her attic, they would not be a viable candidate. Instead we get Palin-light.
Charlie Crist can be whatever he wants, I wouldn't question it, unless he was going around thumping his bible about 'lust' and how we should all act.
I am all for O'Donnell and the like winning the nominations. It certainly will make for an easier election come November
|
Threaded Mode