Klobuchar gaining steam

[JohnR]

Sanders, Warren, or Bloomberg - I will actively, happily, and decisively vote for Trump.

Klobuchar is mildly appealing and might not destroy the country. Unsure on Pete.

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by JohnR

Sanders, Warren, or Bloomberg - I will actively, happily, and decisively vote for Trump.

Klobuchar is mildly appealing and might not destroy the country. Unsure on Pete.

Klobuchar might not destroy the country

But Trumps certainly will.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Klobuchar might not destroy the country

But Trumps certainly will.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

yep....still waiting for the market and economy to collapse and WW3 to begin

[The Dad Fisherman]

Originally Posted by scottw

yep....still waiting for the market and economy to collapse and WW3 to begin

Good thing all those women marched in Washington inauguration weekend to protest all those rights they’ve lost since then too.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Sea Dangles]

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman

Good thing all those women marched in Washington inauguration weekend to protest all those rights they’ve lost since then too.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

The good news is Spence added to his hat collection.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by scottw

yep....still waiting for the market and economy to collapse and WW3 to begin

Typical response for those who see Trump via the market and the economy, because now it counts ..

Funny never heard Trump supporters question his reported job number

[rphud]

I think Carville is on to something, less than 20% of the voting public elects over 50% of the Senate. Could end up with 4 years of no government action depending on the presidential election.

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by JohnR

Sanders, Warren, or Bloomberg - I will actively, happily, and decisively vote for Trump.

Klobuchar is mildly appealing and might not destroy the country. Unsure on Pete.

I doubt that she can reign in the Progressive desire to pretty much gut the 1A and 2A. Her judicial nominations would also reflect that. I have voted for the person in the primary election. But I have long dispensed with the notion of voting for the person in the general election. Klobuchar and Pete will have to execute their Party's will. The Progressive agenda is the driving force of the Democrat Party. Your desire to protect what's left of the Constitution would not be in good hands if either of them were elected along with a Democrat Congress.

[JohnR]

Originally Posted by detbuch

The Progressive agenda is the driving force of the Democrat Party.

And this ^^^ right here is the problem. The line I will not cross.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by JohnR

And this ^^^ right here is the problem. The line I will not cross.

and it's not moderately progressive either, it’s extreme. In 2008 when Obama won, Bernie was considered a lunatic on the fringe with zero support outside of a tiny, all white state populated mostly by Woodstock hippies.

It’s stunning what TDS has done to that party. Stunning. Pete Buttigueg, who wants abortions for
any reason until birth, open borders, and legalized heroin possession, is a moderate.

If that’s what passes for
moderate in today’s democrat party, they could be in serious trouble. Because you’re not the only one who won’t cross that line.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

if the democraps want to beat trump in november they need to get tulsi and AOC to run as a ticket and campaign in bikinis... jello wrestling each other at each campaign stop...that's really the only chance they have to draw anyone's interest at this point...

[scottw]

GIDDAYUP!!


2020 ELECTIONS

Sanders Cements Front-Runner Status After New Hampshire Win
Vermont senator expands lead over Biden to 10 points


Carville fires back at Sanders for 'hack' slam: 'At least I'm not a communist'