added credibility to Bidens accuser?

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

well, you avoided the topic and did something to the effect that there has been a thread, then avoided it further by requesting that the moderators moderate.

so you posted here twice about subjects not related to the thread. i merely pointed that out. if providing a re-cap of what you did is insulting to you, then i suggest perhaps acting in a manner in which seeing an accurate summary of your actions, doesn’t bother you.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I asked a simple question . so is there a time limit on when someone has to respond to a thread you started before you think they're duck ing the subject?

You didn't provide a recap, you insulted me. You do it's so often here you don't even recognize it anymore. You constantly insult me first and then in another thread complain about liberals insulting conservatives. Your hypocrisy is stunning.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

I asked a simple question . so is there a time limit on when someone has to respond to a thread you started before you think they're duck ing the subject?

You didn't provide a recap, you insulted me. You do it's so often here you don't even recognize it anymore. You constantly insult me first and then in another thread complain about liberals insulting conservatives. Your hypocrisy is stunning.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

three posts by you which dont respond in any way, to the thread.

do you have anything whatsoever to say, about the apparent difference in the coverage and reactions to the allegations against biden, to those of the allegations against Kavanaugh?

there is more evidence, not the same, not less, to support the accusations against biden. Hell, maybe Biden’s last 10 interviews have all been a ruse to lay the groundwork for an insanity defense in the criminal probe against him. that would explain his sudden and obvious senility and inability to string two sentences together.


doesn’t quite explain his graduating 76th out of a class of 85 and claiming he was in the middle of his class, but let’s just conclude math isn’t his strong suit. either that or honesty.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

three posts by you which dont respond in any way, to the thread.

do you have anything whatsoever to say, about the apparent difference in the coverage and reactions to the allegations against biden, to those of the allegations against Kavanaugh?

there is more evidence, not the same, not less, to support the accusations against biden. Hell, maybe Biden’s last 10 interviews have all been a ruse to lay the groundwork for an insanity defense in the criminal probe against him. that would explain his sudden and obvious senility and inability to string two sentences together.


doesn’t quite explain his graduating 76th out of a class of 85 and claiming he was in the middle of his class, but let’s just conclude math isn’t his strong suit. either that or honesty.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Well we have a president who claimed he graduated top of his class at Wharton but then will not release his grades after wanting Obama to release his and also having his lawyer send letters to UPenn stating they will sue if UPenn releases the grades. So let's conclude that Honesty or math isn't the president strong suit.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

Well we have a president who claimed he graduated top of his class at Wharton but then will not release his grades after wanting Obama to release his and also having his lawyer send letters to UPenn stating they will sue if UPenn releases the grades. So let's conclude that Honesty or math isn't the president strong suit.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

4 posts by you, without touching the subject of the thread. but you did manage to bring trump
into it.

i’ll show you a courtesy you won’t show me. i concede that honesty and humility are not strong suits of Trump.

Any chance at all, you can comment on my question about the disparity in liberal
reaction to the accusations against ford and kavanaugh? or is it your intent to just filibuster here?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

4 posts by you, without touching the subject of the thread. but you did manage to bring trump
into it.

i’ll show you a courtesy you won’t show me. i concede that honesty and humility are not strong suits of Trump.

Any chance at all, you can comment on my question about the disparity in liberal
reaction to the accusations against ford and kavanaugh? or is it your intent to just filibuster here?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I just directly responded to one of your quotes and provided a counterpoint
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

I just directly responded to one of your quotes.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

so the best you can do, is ignore the questions i ask, and just look for any opportunity to change the conversation to trump? of course that’s your right.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

so the best you can do, is ignore the questions i ask, and just look for any opportunity to change the conversation to trump? of course that’s your right.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I responded numerous times in the other thread before it fell apart. you mentioned something about Biden's ranking in college and I responded back with Trump's. I don't know what Biden's class ranking had anything to do with the subject of the thread. Seemed to me you were switching subjects.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device