Republican Party is...

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Love your disappointment
and for nit sending in troops to put down the violent lefty protests


Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Youre the most ignorant person on this board. WHat are citizens supposed to do, when state/local authorities won't maintain peace? What would you do?

When Eisenhower was president, American schools were ordered to be de-segregated. In Arkansas, the racist governor (guess which party???) refused to let blacks attend white schools. He actually used Arkansas National Guardsmen to prevent black students from entering schools, defying federal law.

So Eisenhower did the only thing. He sent in the 101st Airborne, armed to the teeth, and told that racist hick (and democrat) governor to get the hell out of their way.

I suppose you oppose what Eisenhower did there, you would have preferred that he not send in the troops. You'd have told those black students to lump it in their horrible black schools? Is that what you would have done? Because history has pretty much decided that what Eisenhower did was awesome. But you disagree. You said that what Eisenhower did, was anti-American. It was "anti American" for the president to make sure that actual racism was squashed? Not the fake racism that democrats today never stop menstruating about, I mean real, actual, brutal, racism. Youre actually saying it was un-american for Eisehower to use troops to enforce anti-segregation laws?

WOW. I mean, wow.

FOR ONE SECOND, can't you put down your rabid blind partisanship, and imagine how you'd feel is you put your life savings into a small business that was being ransacked by a mob, and your governor didn't care? Wouldn't you beg for your president to send in the troops?

[Got Stripers]

Hey it's Xmas, think more like Melania and spread the xmas spirit.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Got Stripers

Hey it's Xmas, think more like Melania and spread the xmas spirit.

to retort in your manner...

[Got Stripers]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

to retort in your manner...

Attachment 67563

Agree, I’m sure her legs cross and a headache comes on if Donny wants to get frisky, although I think he gets off by tweeting as his preferred rush.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Got Stripers

Agree, I’m sure her legs cross and a headache comes on if Donny wants to get frisky, although I think he gets off by tweeting as his preferred rush.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

As always, everything, including the fact that a CA senator is a skank, has to be about Trump.

What are you afraid would happen, exactly, if you just admitted what's in her past? What is the compulsion to turn everything into a dig on Trump?

I'm not sure she knows how to cross her legs.

[spence]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

As always, everything, including the fact that a CA senator is a skank, has to be about Trump.

What are you afraid would happen, exactly, if you just admitted what's in her past? What is the compulsion to turn everything into a dig on Trump?

I'm not sure she knows how to cross her legs.

At least Jim has cemented his position as the most depraved and misogynistic person on the site.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

At least Jim has cemented his position as the most depraved and misogynistic person on the site.

Is it misogynistic and depraved, if it's true? Did she have an open and public affair with Willie Brown when Brown was decades older, and married, yes or no? And did Brown appoint her to a few political positions because of who he was, yes or no?

I hear a lot of liberals bemoaning the inequities of our criminal justice system. As a prosecutor, Harris put a lot of blacks in prison for marijuana, but joked in a radio interview about her own personal experiences with pot. Tulsi Gabard single-handedly ended Harris' presidential run by pointing that out. Is that lack of principles a character flaw, Spence? Yes or no?

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

At least Jim has cemented his position as the most depraved and misogynistic person on the site.

But you don't consider it depraved or misogynistic when Got Stripers puts a photoshopped, manufactured, and vulgar image of Melania up here. That's fine. But it's not OK with you, if I point out things that a Democrat female, has actually said and done.

SO to you, it's OK to lie about a Republican woman, but not to tell the truth about a democrat woman. Makes all kinds of sense!

[Got Stripers]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

As always, everything, including the fact that a CA senator is a skank, has to be about Trump.

What are you afraid would happen, exactly, if you just admitted what's in her past? What is the compulsion to turn everything into a dig on Trump?

I'm not sure she knows how to cross her legs.

Gee wiz left me think , because he is fuc*ed up, a loose cannon, probably alone on an island with other wack jobs who think he actually won the election and now he his considering martial law to take control. I’m going to dig at you believers until he is escorted out by the military he thinks mistakenly are going to do his biding. You think he did a great job and you are entitled to your opinion, does NOT make it so it just comforts you in your defense. Game show con men should understand their area of expertise and in Trumps case it isn’t leading a nation.

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

Youre the most ignorant person on this board. WHat are citizens supposed to do, when state/local authorities won't maintain peace? What would you do?

When Eisenhower was president, American schools were ordered to be de-segregated. In Arkansas, the racist governor (guess which party???) refused to let blacks attend white schools. He actually used Arkansas National Guardsmen to prevent black students from entering schools, defying federal law.

So Eisenhower did the only thing. He sent in the 101st Airborne, armed to the teeth, and told that racist hick (and democrat) governor to get the hell out of their way.

I suppose you oppose what Eisenhower did there, you would have preferred that he not send in the troops. You'd have told those black students to lump it in their horrible black schools? Is that what you would have done? Because history has pretty much decided that what Eisenhower did was awesome. But you disagree. You said that what Eisenhower did, was anti-American. It was "anti American" for the president to make sure that actual racism was squashed? Not the fake racism that democrats today never stop menstruating about, I mean real, actual, brutal, racism. Youre actually saying it was un-american for Eisehower to use troops to enforce anti-segregation laws?

WOW. I mean, wow.

FOR ONE SECOND, can't you put down your rabid blind partisanship, and imagine how you'd feel is you put your life savings into a small business that was being ransacked by a mob, and your governor didn't care? Wouldn't you beg for your president to send in the troops?

Do your false equivalence have any limits do you read history books or only the history the right try’s to use to justify Trumps actions.. it’s clear why your one of the Faithful
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Do your false equivalence have any limits do you read history books or only the history the right try’s to use to justify Trumps actions.. it’s clear why your one of the Faithful
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

It’s not a false equivalence. You said it’s anti american for the federal government to use troops in our cities. i provided a famous example. you knew you lost, so you babble about a false equivalence.

what you’re saying, is it would only be unamerican if trump did it.

for the second time wayne, if you invested your life savings in a small business, and it was being ransacked by rioters, and your state and local government chose not to enforce the law....you said it would be un american for you to wish that the feds would send in troops?

better for you to just watch them burn your business down? that’s what you’d do?

why won’t you answer?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

It’s not a false equivalence. You said it’s anti american for the federal government to use troops in our cities. i provided a famous example. you knew you lost, so you babble about a false equivalence.

what you’re saying, is it would only be unamerican if trump did it.

for the second time wayne, if you invested your life savings in a small business, and it was being ransacked by rioters, and your state and local government chose not to enforce the law....you said it would be un american for you to wish that the feds would send in troops?

better for you to just watch them burn your business down? that’s what you’d do?

why won’t you answer?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

You still have no concept on why Trump wanted to send Troops, his desire had nothing to do with law an order or saving any American small business ( his absent in the Covid bill re enforces he doesn’t care about American small business or Americans in general) he just wanted to send in the Troops to fulfill the fantasies of his supporters like you. And show those libs who’s boss. Nothing more it was a state issue..

And seeing you still have a lack of understanding When the governor of Arkansas failed to integrate Central High School, President Eisenhower called in federal troops to protect the Little Rock Nine.

The Arkansas National Guard was drawn into the conflict when Governor Orval Faubus ordered them to "Preserve the Peace" by turning away the black students who were attempting to integrate into Little Rock's Central High School. United States President Dwight D. Eisenhower reacted to this use of the Guard to foil the court-ordered integration by federalizing the entire Arkansas National Guard and using it to protect the nine black students integrating Central High School.

If that’s to hard to understand I’ll make it easier

Eisenhower did what he did to
Uphold Civil Rights And Protect Black Americans.

Trump Is Trying To Silence Dissent with his threats Send in the feds

The 2 are still not remotely the same
Ps Trump never actually did anything
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

You still have no concept on why Trump wanted to send Troops, his desire had nothing to do with law an order or saving any American small business ( his absent in the Covid bill re enforces he doesn’t care about American small business or Americans in general) he just wanted to send in the Troops to fulfill the fantasies of his supporters like you. And show those libs who’s boss. Nothing more it was a state issue..

And seeing you still have a lack of understanding When the governor of Arkansas failed to integrate Central High School, President Eisenhower called in federal troops to protect the Little Rock Nine.

The Arkansas National Guard was drawn into the conflict when Governor Orval Faubus ordered them to "Preserve the Peace" by turning away the black students who were attempting to integrate into Little Rock's Central High School. United States President Dwight D. Eisenhower reacted to this use of the Guard to foil the court-ordered integration by federalizing the entire Arkansas National Guard and using it to protect the nine black students integrating Central High School.

If that’s to hard to understand I’ll make it easier

Eisenhower did what he did to
Uphold Civil Rights And Protect Black Americans.

Trump Is Trying To Silence Dissent with his threats Send in the feds

The 2 are still not remotely the same
Ps Trump never actually did anything
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

trump didn’t want to send troops, which is why he didn’t. i think that was a horrible decision. if he wanted to send troops, he would have.

ever notice that i can answer your questions, while all you do is dodge?

“Eisenhower did what he did to uphold civil rights.”

agreed!

but why don’t homeowners and small business owners in cities destroyed by riots, have the same rights?

that’s the third time i’ve asked that same exact question. three times. zero answers from you. because you know i’m right.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

trump didn’t want to send troops, which is why he didn’t. i think that was a horrible decision. if he wanted to send troops, he would have.

ever notice that i can answer your questions, while all you do is dodge?

“Eisenhower did what he did to uphold civil rights.”

agreed!

but why don’t homeowners and small business owners in cities destroyed by riots, have the same rights?

that’s the third time i’ve asked that same exact question. three times. zero answers from you. because you know i’m right.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

States responsibility not federal governments it’s that easy , the right doesn’t care about those business they used that as cover to and justify the rittenhouses of the work the pro administration boys and the latest group in or Oregon milita who tried to storm the state house , not threat to send troops to deal with them , why because they supported Trump and he loved it

As for business destroyed how about Covid what do Republicans pass 3 martinis 100% right off for corporate American

What do dems ask for Earned income tax credit.

See the difference
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

States responsibility not federal governments it’s that easy , the right doesn’t care about those business they used that as cover to and justify the rittenhouses of the work the pro administration boys and the latest group in or Oregon milita who tried to storm the state house , not threat to send troops to deal with them , why because they supported Trump and he loved it

As for business destroyed how about Covid what do Republicans pass 3 martinis 100% right off for corporate American

What do dems ask for Earned income tax credit.

See the difference
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

"States responsibility not federal governments it’s that easy "

But what happens when the state fails in that responsibility, as in th ecase of teh Arkansas redneck governor? Why are you OK with Eisenhower sending in troops to keep the peace, but not Trump? Federal law specifically allows the feds to send in troops in certain situations, it's been done multiple times. So you're demonstrably wrong. It's primarily the state's responsibility, but when the state cannot or will not live up to that responsibility, it's the federal government's responsibility.

"the right doesn’t care about those business"

First, you are a lousy, lousy mindreader. I care about those business owners. Second, It seems like YOU are the one who doesn't care, because I asked you three times what those people are supposed to do when the state can't keep peace, and you havent answered. As so often happens, you are unable to respond to such a simple and obvious question, because even you know there is no sane answer that supports your agenda.

"As for business destroyed how about Covid"

State governments destroyed small businesses in response to covid, not politically motivated rioters. Talk about a false equivalence!

"what do Republicans pass 3 martinis 100% right off for corporate American"

Sorry, I can't find my gibberish --> English dictionary, I don't know what that means. I do know that our economy is in a v-shaped recovery, we're WAAAYY better off than most people thought we'd be at this point.

For the 4th time...what should small business owners do, when rioters are attacking their businesses, and the state can't (or won't) help them? It's "un American" for the military to help them? But it was OK for the military to help the Little Rock 9? So you're saying black students have more of a right to go to school, than business owners have of not watching their business get destroyed? Is that what you're saying? Business owners have no right to expect that their property will be protected?