Hilary email

[spence]

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman

Kinda like making it home driving Chit-faced....No harm, No Foul.

Pretty sure it's still illegal.....or at the very least irresponsible.

And at the very least I shouldn't be allowed to be in charge of the van pool...
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

You keep comparing illegal activity with legal but not perfect behavior. I'd say it's more akin to steering briefly with your knee.

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by spence

You keep comparing illegal activity with legal but not perfect behavior. I'd say it's more akin to steering briefly with your knee.

He did throw in "at the very least irresponsible . . . And at the very least [she] shouldn't be allowed to be in charge of the van pool...

She's disqualified whether her actions were legal or illegal.

[The Dad Fisherman]

Originally Posted by spence

You keep comparing illegal activity with legal but not perfect behavior. I'd say it's more akin to steering briefly with your knee.

Its legal to own a car and drive a car, you can drive it 24/7 if you want. you can load it up with people or you can load it up with crap and drive it anywhere you want

Its illegal to operate under the influence, there is the crime.

You can own your own server. You can run it 24/7 if you want. You can load it up with all the files you want. Hillary is free to store all her leather thong and corset pics she wants (feel free to file that visual away in your spank bank)

Its illegal to mis-handle, whether with intent or through negligence, classified material. She signed an NDA to that fact saying that when she took her position as SecState.

Her defenders are always quick to say that she didn't do anything illegal by having her server and think that covers it.....its not the fact that she had a server.....its what she did with it that is the problem.

[spence]

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman

Its illegal to mis-handle, whether with intent or through negligence, classified material. She signed an NDA to that fact saying that when she took her position as SecState.

Her defenders are always quick to say that she didn't do anything illegal by having her server and think that covers it.....its not the fact that she had a server.....its what she did with it that is the problem.

I think we all understand it's not just about the server. The issue here is there still isn't really evidence Clinton mishandled anything, yet people are all running around saying she did.

Clinton being forwarded what's considered at the time benign information, that years later is deemed sensitive during a public release process is not mishandling information.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

I think we all understand it's not just about the server. The issue here is there still isn't really evidence Clinton mishandled anything, yet people are all running around saying she did.

Clinton being forwarded what's considered at the time benign information, that years later is deemed sensitive during a public release process is not mishandling information.

"The issue here is there still isn't really evidence Clinton mishandled anything"

The existence of some of that data on her personal server, is problematic to some people. She created the atmosphere, which made it necessaru to have that data on her personal server.

"Clinton being forwarded what's considered at the time benign information"

I don't know that we know, that 100% of what made its way to her server, was believed to be benign at the time.

I wonder why she deleted all those emails. Didn't she say that everything she deleted was personal, not work-related? Wedding plans, yoga classes, and th elike?

And when a reporter asked her is she had the server "wiped", she relpied "you mean with a cloth?" Yeah, that's the kind of honest leadership we need.

[spence]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

I wonder why she deleted all those emails. Didn't she say that everything she deleted was personal, not work-related? Wedding plans, yoga classes, and th elike?

Why would you turn over personal emails?

[buckman]

Originally Posted by spence

Why would you turn over personal emails?

Regardless of what you think Spence, the diabolical way she went about it and the amount of money the Clinton's have raked in since 2014 , obviously, shows that the Clintons have a tough time keeping personal business separate from government business . To them it's one in the same. They need to prove they are not crooked because everything they do points to the fact that they are .
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by buckman

Regardless of what you think Spence, the diabolical way she went about it and the amount of money the Clinton's have raked in since 2014 , obviously, shows that the Clintons have a tough time keeping personal business separate from government business . To them it's one in the same. They need to prove they are not crooked because everything they do points to the fact that they are .
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Colin Powell got Congress to buy 44,000 new computers for the State Department and drove the organization to get onto the State's email system.

Except he used his own personal email as well.

Was that diabolical?

Bush 43 get's paid six figures to speak and his foundation has similar assets to the Clinton's. Shouldn't we be investigating Jeb in case he becomes president and starts to return all those favors?

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

Why would you turn over personal emails?

Don't we know for a fact, that some of the deleted emails were work-related? Are you feeling OK?