Have Hillary's chickens come home to roost?

[spence]

Originally Posted by justplugit

Spence, what's your source for those facts?

Any news report but FOX or Drudge

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

Any news report but FOX or Drudge

Actually, I heard on Fox the same facts.

Spence, if she authors an email as Secstate, shouldn't she know whether or not it has content that is suitable for non-secure servers?

I don't think there is any evidence that she sent or received emails that were classified at the time she sent/received them. That's important to keep in mind.

It's also fair to question her judgment for failing to recognize the sensitivity of the emails she composed herself.

There's also no excuse to her response when asked if she had the server wiped - "what, you nmean with a cloth". Yeah, because natiional security lapses are so hysterical.

Spence, answer me this. She claimed, as First Lady, that Bill wasn't cheating on her, but rather he was being framed by Republicans (the vast right-wing conspiracy). In my opinion, that's an absurdly stupid statement to make. If she really believes that the GOP framed her husband, she's too paranoid/stupid to be POTUS. And if she didn't really believe what she was saying, then she's too dishonest to be POTUS. There is no third option. What do you think?

[spence]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

Spence, if she authors an email as Secstate, shouldn't she know whether or not it has content that is suitable for non-secure servers?

That depends, certainly there is some information she would know should only be sent on a classified network. Other information may seem banal at the time, but could be classified later because of the situation or another government agency has a different opinion about it's nature.

That's why I'd like to see how much email on state.gov is later classified to gain a baseline understanding. I'd wager it's quite a lot.

There's also no excuse to her response when asked if she had the server wiped - "what, you nmean with a cloth". Yeah, because natiional security lapses are so hysterical.

No doubt she hasn't handled the situation well.

Spence, answer me this. She claimed, as First Lady, that Bill wasn't cheating on her, but rather he was being framed by Republicans (the vast right-wing conspiracy). In my opinion, that's an absurdly stupid statement to make. If she really believes that the GOP framed her husband, she's too paranoid/stupid to be POTUS. And if she didn't really believe what she was saying, then she's too dishonest to be POTUS. There is no third option. What do you think?

Her remark wasn't about just infidelity, but the relentless attacks Bill was under once his announced his candidacy and throughout his first term. Remember, there were people bribing others to manufacture scandal.

[justplugit]

Originally Posted by spence

Any news report but FOX or Drudge

Ya gotta look at them all Spence for reference or, you could miss something.

Like for instance, if you were looking for news on Cheryl Mills, long time Hillary aide, who helped her set up her server, you wouldn't know she is going to Plead The 5TH on the Hillary's Congressional hearings. Could find it on NBC and ABC though.

Guess CBS didn't think it wasn't important news.
The plot thickens.

[Jackbass]

Originally Posted by justplugit

Like for instance, if you were looking for news on Cheryl Mills, long time Hillary aide, who helped her set up her server, you wouldn't know she is going to Plead The 5TH on the Hillary's Congressional hearings. Could find it on NBC and ABC though.

Guess CBS didn't think it wasn't important news.
The plot thickens.

She is probably just trying to avoid a potential life threatening accident or assisted suicide(merely speculation)

Hillary will not be indicted she will not serve time and she will be the nominee for POTUS. She is over 70 million raised currently. Higher than any other candidate aside from Jeb who is over 110 million. Bought and sold
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Rockport24]

Originally Posted by Jackbass

Hillary will not be indicted she will not serve time and she will be the nominee for POTUS. She is over 70 million raised currently. Higher than any other candidate aside from Jeb who is over 110 million. Bought and sold
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

^ it all comes down to this, just too many now invested in her being elected. Honestly she is really the Dems only hope, even if Biden decides to run its an uphill battle with all of his buffoonery. Then he will pick Chief E. Warren and blow the whole thing anyway!

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Rockport24

^ Then he will pick Chief E. Warren and blow the whole thing anyway!

Biden will absolutely pick Apache Chief if he gets the nomination, he would need her to energize the radical left wing faction of the party.

[spence]

Originally Posted by justplugit

Like for instance, if you were looking for news on Cheryl Mills, long time Hillary aide, who helped her set up her server, you wouldn't know she is going to Plead The 5TH on the Hillary's Congressional hearings. Could find it on NBC and ABC though.

Pleading the 5th doesn't mean you have anything to hide. Many of those she would have to go before have already made criminal accusations, it's a witch hunt I certainly wouldn't want to be a part of.

[scottw]

Originally Posted by spence

Pleading the 5th doesn't mean you have anything to hide.

[justplugit]

Originally Posted by spence

Pleading the 5th doesn't mean you have anything to hide. Many of those she would have to go before have already made criminal accusations, it's a witch hunt I certainly wouldn't want to be a part of.

Simple, if you don't lie and tell the truth you don't need a good
memory and nothing to fear.

[spence]

Originally Posted by justplugit

Simple, if you don't lie and tell the truth you don't need a good
memory and nothing to fear.

If it was an objective investigation one might hope that would be true. I don't see how anyone could see any of this as objective.

[justplugit]

Originally Posted by spence

If it was an objective investigation one might hope that would be true. I don't see how anyone could see any of this as objective.

If it proved Hillary was innocent you would be the first one to say
it was objective.

[Nebe]

..........

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by justplugit

Ya gotta look at them all Spence for reference or, you could miss something.

Like for instance, if you were looking for news on Cheryl Mills, long time Hillary aide, who helped her set up her server, you wouldn't know she is going to Plead The 5TH on the Hillary's Congressional hearings. Could find it on NBC and ABC though.

Guess CBS didn't think it wasn't important news.
The plot thickens.

a quick search on CBS news of "Cheryl Mills" turned this up as the 1st article.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/former-s...h-to-congress/

[justplugit]

Originally Posted by PaulS

a quick search on CBS news of "Cheryl Mills" turned this up as the 1st article.

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/former-s...h-to-congress/

Ya, a day late and a dollar short.

They had no choice but to cover it today.