Durham report

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Because Trump is relative as more and more info surfaces
His incident actually happen and is still happening

Your Hunter laptop is fixation is imaginary

And now Durham seems to be trying to charge people for irrelevant non material false statements

"It has long been a crime to make a false statement to the government. But the law criminalizes only false statements that are material — false statements that matter because they can actually affect a specific decision of the government."

The attorneys wrote that "false statements about ancillary matters" are immaterial.

"Because Trump is relative as more and more info surfaces "

Joe Biden, the sitting president, isn't relevant! Gotcha.

How do you know that Durham made false statements? Because Hilary said so?

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

"Because Trump is relative as more and more info surfaces "

Joe Biden, the sitting president, isn't relevant! Gotcha. Jim get back to me when Biden tries to steal the election , or fudges his company's valuation or Has his un elected kids in the white House

How do you know that Durham made false statements? Because Hilary said so?

can you read Durham seems to be trying to charge people for irrelevant non material false statements nothing about him making false statements


you really need to watch and read New from other sources

[scottw]

Originally Posted by wdmso

you really need to watch and read New from other sources

they say reading helps improve your spelling and grammar...

[Got Stripers]

Originally Posted by scottw

they say reading helps improve your spelling and grammar...

If to people post there opinions and the tyme two do sow isn’t apropriate, rust assured their will be one guy we can awl depend on to set things right.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Originally Posted by Got Stripers

If to people post there opinions and the tyme two do sow isn’t apropriate, rust assured their will be one guy we can awl depend on to set things right.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

that's the most interesting thing you've offered in a very long time

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

can you read Durham seems to be trying to charge people for irrelevant non material false statements nothing about him making false statements


you really need to watch and read New from other sources

"Jim get back to me when Biden tries to steal the election, or fudges his company's valuation or Has his un elected kids in the white House"

Mueller didn't investigate Trump for any of those things. Yet you were OK with that investigation.

Hilarys campaign team may well have tried to overturn the results of the 2016 election, by fabricating the Russia hoax.

Trumps kids were in unelected positions. Advisors arent elected.

You want Biden's son Hunter serving as a senior policy advisor? I doubt it.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

can you read Durham seems to be trying to charge people for irrelevant non material false statements nothing about him making false statements

How is it irrelevant if Hilary's campaign staff paid tech experts to hack into Trumps servers, when they were running against each other for president? And then continued to do so when he was POTUS?

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

How is it irrelevant if Hilary's campaign staff paid tech experts to hack into Trumps servers, when they were running against each other for president? And then continued to do so when he was POTUS?

Jim like I said you Are a 1 trick Fox pony you need to read other sources other than the ones telling you what you want to hear


Thus far, Durham has not charged anyone with spying on Trump. how can that be if it happened


The FBI investigated Sussmann’s tip but concluded that it was not suspicious at all. The indictment said agents found that the computer in question “was not owned or operated by the Trump Organization,


In a later filing in October, Durham appeared to acknowledge that he did not have evidence that Sussmann ever spoke directly to the Clinton campaign about Alfa Bank.

have fun explaining how everyone's lying

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Jim like I said you Are a 1 trick Fox pony you need to read other sources other than the ones telling you what you want to hear


Thus far, Durham has not charged anyone with spying on Trump. how can that be if it happened


The FBI investigated Sussmann’s tip but concluded that it was not suspicious at all. The indictment said agents found that the computer in question “was not owned or operated by the Trump Organization,


In a later filing in October, Durham appeared to acknowledge that he did not have evidence that Sussmann ever spoke directly to the Clinton campaign about Alfa Bank.

have fun explaining how everyone's lying

"Thus far, Durham has not charged anyone with spying on Trump."

Hes. Not. Done.

He submitted a report last weekend, which supposedly showed that Hilarys lawyers hired people to hack into Trumps servers when he was running, and even White House servers after Trump was president.

I have 2 very simple questions...

(1) do you have concrete evidence that this spying never happened, that Durham is lying?

(2) if Durham is correct and that happened, is it a big deal?

You're dismissing this all as a waste, when he's just getting started. It may well turn out to be a waste, and if it is, I'll be the first one to say it.

But IF Hilarys lawyers paid tech experts to spy on Trump, I think most Americans would find that a huge deal. You'll all dismiss it, but most people won't.

You aren't capable of admitting flaws in democrats, or virtue in Republicans.