|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
06-26-2022, 06:21 PM
|
#1
|
Canceled
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: vt
Posts: 13,069
|
Unfortunately for you nobody on the left is requiring people to have an abortion, unlike the prior administration’s forced sterilization of immigrants.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
06-26-2022, 07:48 PM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,429
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F.
Unfortunately for you nobody on the left is requiring people to have an abortion, unlike the prior administration’s forced sterilization of immigrants.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
you think it’s bad for me, that people aren’t required to get abortions. d be happier, if people
we’re forced to get abortions?
You are an unbelievable idiot.
You said abortion should be available until birth. Poll after poll
shows that’s a fringe position.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
06-26-2022, 09:47 PM
|
#3
|
Canceled
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: vt
Posts: 13,069
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
you think it’s bad for me, that people aren’t required to get abortions. d be happier, if people
we’re forced to get abortions?
You are an unbelievable idiot.
You said abortion should be available until birth. Poll after poll
shows that’s a fringe position.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Republicans want zero abortions, not for any cause, rape, incest, cancer treatment, danger to the mother.
The rapist gets how many years and the person who was raped gets?
How long would you imprison your mother, sister, wife for receiving or aiding in an abortion.
"abortion was so “deeply rooted” in colonial America that one of our nation’s most influential architects went out of his way to insert it into the most widely & enduringly read..math textbook of the colonial Americas..Abortion was simply a part of life"
The Supreme Court now largely functions as a mechanism for turning right wing culture war grievances into law, and the reason other constitutional rights are not safe is there will always be a new conservative grudge to be remedied by judicial fiat.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Last edited by Pete F.; 06-26-2022 at 09:56 PM..
|
Frasier: Niles, I’ve just had the most marvelous idea for a website! People will post their opinions, cheeky bon mots, and insights, and others will reply in kind!
Niles: You have met “people”, haven’t you?
Lets Go Darwin
|
|
|
06-27-2022, 03:42 AM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F.
The Supreme Court now largely functions as a mechanism for turning right wing culture war grievances into law,
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
which culture grievance did they create a law for pete?
|
|
|
|
06-27-2022, 05:23 AM
|
#5
|
Canceled
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: vt
Posts: 13,069
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw
which culture grievance did they create a law for pete?
|
Rowe v Wade
All because some appointed people believe in the absurd originalist doctrine that claims
(1) we should ignore changes in social conditions or context
(2) we should trust politically motivated lawyers to interpret the contextual meaning of anything that happened 300 years ago.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Frasier: Niles, I’ve just had the most marvelous idea for a website! People will post their opinions, cheeky bon mots, and insights, and others will reply in kind!
Niles: You have met “people”, haven’t you?
Lets Go Darwin
|
|
|
06-27-2022, 05:34 AM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,429
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete F.
Rowe v Wade
All because some appointed people believe in the absurd originalist doctrine that claims
(1) we should ignore changes in social conditions or context
(2) we should trust politically motivated lawyers to interpret the contextual meaning of anything that happened 300 years ago.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
but you’re only ok when liberals can decide “what they meant to say” in the constitution”.
if you want the constitution to mean something other than what it says, either amend it, or deal with it.
again, you’re wrong. it’s your side who wants to trust lawyers, unelected lawyers at that, by saying SCOTUS has the authority to set policy.
Better to leave that to legislators who we can remove if we choose.
You have zero grasp of the role of the different branches of government.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:32 AM.
|
| |