Hillary for prison 2016

[spence]

Originally Posted by detbuch

Do you have any evidence of this?

Sure, Syed Rizwan Farook.

[The Dad Fisherman]

Originally Posted by spence

Sure, Syed Rizwan Farook.

You mean that guy who got his guns illegally.....that guy.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman

You mean that guy who got his guns illegally.....that guy.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

The two rifles were purchased legally by his friend and transferred illegally. All the handguns were purchased legally by licensed dealers.

[buckman]

Originally Posted by spence

The two rifles were purchased legally by his friend and transferred illegally. All the handguns were purchased legally by licensed dealers.

Your just being a pain in the ass now. The guns used in the terrorist attack were acquired illegally by the terrorist . Perhaps you would like to make the gun manufacture liable ? Whatever you do don't put the blame where it belongs .
The real fix is in making sure people like them do not get here I'm the first place .
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by buckman

Your just being a pain in the ass now. The guns used in the terrorist attack were acquired illegally by the terrorist . Perhaps you would like to make the gun manufacture liable ? Whatever you do don't put the blame where it belongs .
The real fix is in making sure people like them do not get here I'm the first place .
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

No, they were all bought legally from licensed dealers.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...ef3_story.html

I don't think that's really even that important part of the issue though...the question is the threshold for the feds to deny rights under current law without sufficient evidence there's a clear threat to public safety.

[buckman]

Originally Posted by spence

No, they were all bought legally from licensed dealers.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...ef3_story.html

I don't think that's really even that important part of the issue though...the question is the threshold for the feds to deny rights under current law without sufficient evidence there's a clear threat to public safety.

Is there something wrong with you? The weapons were purchased by Enrique Marquez. He then lent them to the shooters. That is illegal ,and he faces multiple charges for it .
A lot of illegally held guns were one time purchased legally..
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by buckman

Is there something wrong with you? The weapons were purchased by Enrique Marquez. He then lent them to the shooters. That is illegal ,and he faces multiple charges for it .
A lot of illegally held guns were one time purchased legally..
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Reread.

[Slipknot]

Originally Posted by spence

No, they were all bought legally from licensed dealers.

I don't think that's really even that important part of the issue though...the question is the threshold for the feds to deny rights under current law without sufficient evidence there's a clear threat to public safety.

Huh? is this a question? can you form this into a sentence or put a verb in so we can comprehend what you are saying?

"There is no limit on the amount of ammunition that U.S. citizens can buy and keep in their homes; " from your link https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...ef3_story.html
Is FALSE information and simply not true, there is a limit, there might not be for all states, but here in the People's Republic of Mass. there is. These journalists should get things correct if they want to be taken seriously instead of trying to put fear into their articles.

[spence]

Originally Posted by Slipknot

"There is no limit on the amount of ammunition that U.S. citizens can buy and keep in their homes; " from your link https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...ef3_story.html
Is FALSE information and simply not true, there is a limit, there might not be for all states, but here in the People's Republic of Mass. there is. These journalists should get things correct if they want to be taken seriously instead of trying to put fear into their articles.

What is the legal ammo possession limit in MA?

[spence]

Originally Posted by Slipknot

"There is no limit on the amount of ammunition that U.S. citizens can buy and keep in their homes;


Is FALSE information and simply not true, there is a limit, there might not be for all states, but here in the People's Republic of Mass. there is. These journalists should get things correct if they want to be taken seriously instead of trying to put fear into their articles.

So there's no federal law, but Massachusetts -- perhaps the most liberal state in the nation -- caps you at a measly 20,000 rounds? The government tyranny here is beyond reproach!

Buck, what would you estimate as the most ammo you've ever had at one time?

This nitpick also doesn't do anything to dismiss the fact the weapons were all purchased legally at a FLL. This has been reported many times...

[The Dad Fisherman]

Originally Posted by spence

The two rifles were purchased legally by his friend and transferred illegally

They're still illegal...

If go fill a prescription for pain meds and then give them to my neighbor, the junkie....does that mean he got them legally?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman

They're still illegal...

If go fill a prescription for pain meds and then give them to my neighbor, the junkie....does that mean he got them legally?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I'm going to moot you. There, you've been mooted.

[Nebe]

Originally Posted by spence

I'm going to moot you. There, you've been mooted.

Just like all the red flags Hillary waves
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by Nebe

Just like all the red flags Hillary waves
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

That's right, you're a Trump fan now.