Bolton pegging Floridaman

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

The reason Trump wanted an investigation - actually not an investigation but "the announcement of an investigation" was bc it would tar the Biden's. He would be touting the announcement and he knows that would hurt the Biden's. By the time it would be over (but since he didn't want an actual investigation - nothing would probably end) Biden would be hurt. Trump knew Biden was his biggest opponent.

This is similar to Benghazi and how McCarthy admitted that the real reason for the prolonged investigation was to hurt H. Clinton politically. How scummy is that, that McCarthy would use dead Americans to score political points.

To think Trump was concerned with any corruption anywhere is laughable.

i never said i had proof of corruption. i said it’s very, very coincidental. id have no problem investigating that. you guys seem awfully desperate to making sure that doesn’t happen. i’m in the fortunate position of being able to accept the truth, regardless of what it is.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

i never said i had proof of corruption. i said it’s very, very coincidental. id have no problem investigating that. you guys seem awfully desperate to making sure that doesn’t happen. i’m in the fortunate position of being able to accept the truth, regardless of what it is.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

so "coincidence" is now reason enough for the Pres. of the US to want an investigation?

I'm not desperate. I just think it is scummy to want an investigation based on "coincidence".

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

so "coincidence" is now reason enough for the Pres. of the US to want an investigation?

I'm not desperate. I just think it is scummy to want an investigation based on "coincidence".

i didn’t say i think it’s a coincidence. i said i think it’s obviously fishy and extremely indicative of corrupt cronyism.

I said that liberals claim it was a coincidence.

a harmless coincidence is one thing. that’s probably not what this is.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

i didn’t say i think it’s a coincidence. i said i think it’s obviously fishy and extremely indicative of corrupt cronyism.

I said that liberals claim it was a coincidence.

a harmless coincidence is one thing. that’s probably not what this is.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

There is no proof anything fishy went on.