|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
03-27-2010, 08:34 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,182
|
The amendment is sensible only if your intent is to impede the entire legislation. Leave it to a conservative to propose additional useless legislation while at the very same time demonizing the expansion of government!
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
03-27-2010, 08:55 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Easton, MA
Posts: 5,736
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
The amendment is sensible only if your intent is to impede the entire legislation. Leave it to a conservative to propose additional useless legislation while at the very same time demonizing the expansion of government!
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Is the baby on the way thing affecting your judgement even more than usual, Spence? There are ammendments like this put in every big bill by both parties. The Dems have filled this 2700 page bill with more pork that a redneck 4th of July pig roast, yet you find fault with one conservative ammendment which most people here seem to be in agreement with? To quote a wise man, your post is "Lame".
|
|
|
|
03-27-2010, 09:18 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fishbones
Is the baby on the way thing affecting your judgement even more than usual, Spence? There are ammendments like this put in every big bill by both parties. The Dems have filled this 2700 page bill with more pork that a redneck 4th of July pig roast, yet you find fault with one conservative ammendment which most people here seem to be in agreement with? To quote a wise man, your post is "Lame".
|
be nice to Spence, he's probably suffering terribly from sympathy pain/cramping and morning sickness
|
|
|
|
03-27-2010, 09:33 AM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,182
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fishbones
Is the baby on the way thing affecting your judgement even more than usual, Spence? There are ammendments like this put in every big bill by both parties. The Dems have filled this 2700 page bill with more pork that a redneck 4th of July pig roast, yet you find fault with one conservative ammendment which most people here seem to be in agreement with? To quote a wise man, your post is "Lame".
|
Yet again, you're completely missing the point.
-spence
|
|
|
|
03-27-2010, 10:43 AM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Easton, MA
Posts: 5,736
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Yet again, you're completely missing the point.
-spence
|
No, you're wrong. I got the point. He's slowing down a bill that he doesn't like by picking out one amendment in it. It's not a new concept in politics. Dems and Repubs have been doing it for years. I'm suprised you're have trouble understanding it in this instance, though. I figured you to be bright enough to pick up on that.
|
|
|
|
03-27-2010, 12:09 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,182
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fishbones
No, you're wrong. I got the point. He's slowing down a bill that he doesn't like by picking out one amendment in it. It's not a new concept in politics. Dems and Repubs have been doing it for years. I'm suprised you're have trouble understanding it in this instance, though. I figured you to be bright enough to pick up on that.
|
I think we moved past your point above on page 1.
The issue isn't about the amendment, it's the irony that a "conservative" would propose additional and unnecessary legislation to create more government...
But I know you know that and are just being a pain, sort of like Coburn.
-spence
|
|
|
|
03-27-2010, 04:08 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,688
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
I think we moved past your point above on page 1.
The issue isn't about the amendment, it's the irony that a "conservative" would propose additional and unnecessary legislation to create more government...
But I know you know that and are just being a pain, sort of like Coburn.
-spence
|
How does barring something from this overloaded bill create more government?
|
|
|
|
03-27-2010, 05:11 PM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,182
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by detbuch
How does barring something from this overloaded bill create more government?
|
You're creating another law to be enforced. Is the government going to run background checks on everyone who gets insurance, or perform audits on prescriptions by sex offenders to see if the law has been broken?
If not...why have the law? It could never be enforced.
-spence
|
|
|
|
03-27-2010, 06:54 PM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Easton, MA
Posts: 5,736
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
I think we moved past your point above on page 1.
But I know you know that and are just being a pain, sort of like Coburn.
-spence
|
No, we didn't move past my point on page one.
Yes, I'm being a pain. But not like Coburn, more like you.
|
|
|
|
03-27-2010, 07:45 PM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
with the way that anyone with a shread of decency is running from Obama and the democrats...they're gonna need every sex offender, pervert and illegal alien that they can muster up in November
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:35 PM.
|
| |