martha’s vineyard hypocrisy

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

they welcomed them for two days paul. then got them
out of sight.

lightfoot did the same thing in chicago, shipped them off elsewhere

They were sent to a place which could handle them not shipped off to an island where the intent was to cause as much harm as possible.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

They were sent to a place which could handle them not shipped off to an island where the intent was to cause as much harm as possible.

why can’t martha’s vineyard handle 50 out of the 2 million we get this year?

If a community isn’t prepared to keep any, it’s kind of meaningless, empty virtue-signaling to oppose wall. Isnt it?

Chicago couldn’t keep the ones that Abbott sent?

Paul these are minuscule numbers compared to what they see at the border.

Why would sending them to the vineyard, “cause as much harm as possible?”. what harm befell them in the 48 hours they were there? Did they get injured while sailing or fox hunting with the locals? Did they all get “striper thumb”?

Despite all the self-congratulatory virtue signaling to the contrary, the elites on the Vineyard didn't want these people. So they shipped them off. Lightfoot did the same exact thing.

These people have to live somewhere if we let them stay.

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

Why would sending them to the vineyard, “cause as much harm as possible?”how is it not harmful sending someone who has a immigration hearing in Seattle (I believe it was) to MV?. what harm befell them in the 48 hours they were there? Did they get injured while sailing or fox hunting with the locals? Did they all get “striper thumb”?Nice demonstration of compassion.
.

The cons. states could have easily shown a little compassion to them by informing the cities they were being shipped there so the cities could be ready. But when NYC mayor Adams reached out to TX to discuss being informed, TX refused to tell him bc they showed their true colors by trying to cause as much pain and confusion as they could. It is just another demonstration how cons. states have no compassion for the less fortunate.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

The cons. states could have easily shown a little compassion to them by informing the cities they were being shipped there so the cities could be ready. But when NYC mayor Adams reached out to TX to discuss being informed, TX refused to tell him bc they showed their true colors by trying to cause as much pain and confusion as they could. It is just another demonstration how cons. states have no compassion for the less fortunate.

is it equally bad when democrats dump
illegals without telling the destination to get ready? or only bad when republicans do it?

El Paso gets 1,500 illegals a day, and blue states expect El Paso to shut up and like it. The millionaires in the vineyard can’t take 50?

from yahoo, a very liberal news outlet…andrew not a peep from the high and mighty.

https://news.yahoo.com/biden-dumping...114500037.html

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

The cons. states could have easily shown a little compassion to them by informing the cities they were being shipped there so the cities could be ready. But when NYC mayor Adams reached out to TX to discuss being informed, TX refused to tell him bc they showed their true colors by trying to cause as much pain and confusion as they could. It is just another demonstration how cons. states have no compassion for the less fortunate.

paul it’s very very easy to pat yourself in the back for being compassionate. The vineyard had a chance to put their money where their mouths are, and they showed their true colors.

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

paul it’s very very easy to pat yourself in the back for being compassionate. no one is patting their own back just laughing at the cons. states whose true color is coming out by demonstrating their lack of compassion. Let's not forget who started the thread (one of multiple threads on the same subject)The vineyard had a chance to put their money where their mouths are, and they showed their true colors.

What a joke. They got the immigrants the help they needed. The cons. states repeatedly LIED to them and then shipped them off and REFUSED outreach to make it easier for the immigrants by informing the cities when they were coming.

Why didn't they respond to Adams?
Why ship people to MV when they had immigration meetings across the country?

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

paul it’s very very easy to pat yourself in the back for being compassionate. The vineyard had a chance to put their money where their mouths are, and they showed their true colors.

The only True colors shown . We’re yours and those you support..

Disgusting colors still afraid to admit it was a stunt afraid to admit they played those people. And afraid to admit that MV and the state of Massachusetts took care of those people with dignity and compassion .

Something you and your party has forsaken.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

The only True colors shown . We’re yours and those you support..

Disgusting colors still afraid to admit it was a stunt afraid to admit they played those people. And afraid to admit that MV and the state of Massachusetts took care of those people with dignity and compassion .

Something you and your party has forsaken.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I said from day one it was a politically-motivated stunt. That doesn't mean it's invalid. The southern states are being pulverized by Washington's refusal to secure our border. The people living there pay taxes, and have the right to expect better.

MV took care of them? For 2 days? Let's give them all the Nobel Peace Prize.

This is a winning issue for the right. Americans don't like open borders, for the same exact reason that you don't leave your door open at night.