Hillary

[spence]

Originally Posted by buckman

Wrong again. i didn't hear it from Fox. Her signature is on some pretty relevant papers Spence. Perjury is ok with you I take it .
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

From what I understand it's typical for a lot of communications coming from the State department to be sent as they were from the Secretary...it's just a matter of business. I doubt you have any new information that indicates Hillary was personally aware of this...as previous non-partisan investigations have already concluded.

-spence

[buckman]

Originally Posted by spence

From what I understand it's typical for a lot of communications coming from the State department to be sent as they were from the Secretary...it's just a matter of business. I doubt you have any new information that indicates Hillary was personally aware of this...as previous non-partisan investigations have already concluded.

-spence

CBS no doubt Did I just hear a Jay Carney echo ?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[RIJIMMY]

Originally Posted by spence

previous non-partisan investigations have already concluded.

-spence

of course, because investigations always reach the right conclusion

[JohnnyD]

Originally Posted by spence

From what I understand...

This and similar other phrases always preface your replies that are full of spin or unsubstantiated opinions.

[justplugit]

Amazing how our President said the victims and their families
in Boston deserve answers and justice, and yet Tyrone Wood's Dad is still
fighting for, and waiting to get all the answers and justice for his son in Benghazi for how long now?

[JohnR]

I just want to see the truth, without the spin from the left or right. I have not been believing convinced of what has been printed in the mainstream

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by JohnnyD

This and similar other phrases always preface your replies that are full of spin or unsubstantiated opinions.

LMAO, exactly correct. When he gets all of his "news" from The Huffington Post and The Daily Worker, his "understanding" is a tad askew.

[spence]

Originally Posted by JohnnyD

This and similar other phrases always preface your replies that are full of spin or unsubstantiated opinions.

Do some homework, you'll see plenty of substantiation.

It's not clear who in the State Department sent the April 19 response. But as a general rule, "every single cable sent from Washington to the field is sent over the secretary of state's name," a former State Department official noted, adding, "Though they are trying to make this new, it's not. After 30+ hearings and briefings, thousands of pages, this has all been addressed."

http://ering.foreignpolicy.com/posts...ghazi_security

GOP report faults State Department on Libya security | The Salt Lake Tribune

House GOP report says Clinton rejected plea for more security in Libya - The Washington Post

Same old story...let's rehash a sensitive subject just to create more confusion because it suits our purpose. Defeating Clinton in 2016.

-spence

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

plea for more security in Libya - The Washington Post[/url]

Same old story...let's rehash a sensitive subject just to create more confusion because it suits our purpose. Defeating Clinton in 2016.

-spence

I don't believe anyone previously claimed to have physical evidence that the Secretary of State lied under oath. So if this wasn't talked about before, that means this is a breaking story, and thus it's not a "re-hashing" of anything...

Spence, this is not a closed case. The administration has done everything they can to thwart attempts to figure out what happened.

"it suits our purpose. Defeating Clinton in 2016."

That's one way of looking at it. Another (more accurate) way of looking at it, is that your side is desperately trying to make this go away, in order to elect Clinton in 2016.

Spence, please answer one simple question...If it turns out there are documents signed by her that reject requests for security, do you think that's worth discussing, given that she denied that under oath?