Republican Party is...

[spence]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

when Hilary told Biden before the election, to never concede under any circumstances, to never stop legal challenges if he lost....where was the outrage from the liberals? just wondering.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

That's not what she said Jim.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

That's not what she said Jim.

“Joe Biden should not concede under any circumstances”.

she didn’t carve out an exception for losing fair and square.

“under any circumstances” is pretty clear, is it not?

do you people EVER tire of claiming to have the right to do that which you deny to people who vote differently than you do?


https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbc...mp/ncna1238156
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Got Stripers]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

“Joe Biden should not concede under any circumstances”.

she didn’t carve out an exception for losing fair and square.

“under any circumstances” is pretty clear, is it not?

do you people EVER tire of claiming to have the right to do that which you deny to people who vote differently than you do?


https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbc...mp/ncna1238156
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Gee wiz do you think maybe it had to do with no early concession knowing that all the mail in ballots and absentee ballets would likely eliminate any Trump lead.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Got Stripers

Gee wiz do you think maybe it had to do with no early concession knowing that all the mail in ballots and absentee ballets would likely eliminate any Trump lead.

she said not to concede under any circumstances. that’s very different, than saying don’t concede until the early and mail in ballots are cast.

too fast for you?

No early concession, and no concession under any circumstances, mean the same thing to you, eh?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

“Joe Biden should not concede under any circumstances”.

she didn’t carve out an exception for losing fair and square.

“under any circumstances” is pretty clear, is it not?

do you people EVER tire of claiming to have the right to do that which you deny to people who vote differently than you do?


https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nbc...mp/ncna1238156
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

She said Trump would try and screw up absentee voting so if the election was close to not concede on election day, but to let it play out.

She didn't suggest he should never concede. Your quote is lacking context.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

She said Trump would try and screw up absentee voting so if the election was close to not concede on election day, but to let it play out.

She didn't suggest he should never concede. Your quote is lacking context.

except she didn’t say “don’t concede if there’s any evidence trump
is up to no good.”.

i guess your issue is that you don’t know what “under any circumstances” means. if gutter so inclined, you can look it up, or have a toddler explain it to you.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Got Stripers]

Jim does it really matter what Hillary said or implied, do you contest the election results and if not, why is this current administration putting the health and security of blue and red Americans at risk by not allowing the Biden administration access? If you do feel the election results aren’t true, then adjust your foil hat and go look again at the margins of victory and maybe some clarity will come.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Got Stripers

Jim does it really matter what Hillary said or implied, do you contest the election results and if not, why is this current administration putting the health and security of blue and red Americans at risk by not allowing the Biden administration access? If you do feel the election results aren’t true, then adjust your foil hat and go look again at the margins of victory and maybe some clarity will come.

so first you claim she said something harmless. when faced with what she actually said, is guy say it doesnt matter.

If it’s wrong for teump
to not concede, why isn’t it equally wrong for hilary to say before the election ( so obviously literally zero evidence of fraud yet) that biden should never concede. the media gave her a free pass. but trump, as usual, can’t be given the same courtesy.

i have said ten times, i have zero basis to believe that biden won because of fraud. but i don’t know what trump may have access to. IF he has a legitimate gripe ( huge “if”) he’s entitled to pursue it. if he doesn’t have. legitimate gripe he should shut up and concede.

please point to one syllable in my response that anyone would say is a tin foil hat conspiracy theory.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Got Stripers]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

so first you claim she said something harmless. when faced with what she actually said, is guy say it doesnt matter.

If it’s wrong for teump
to not concede, why isn’t it equally wrong for hilary to say before the election ( so obviously literally zero evidence of fraud yet) that biden should never concede. the media gave her a free pass. but trump, as usual, can’t be given the same courtesy.

i have said ten times, i have zero basis to believe that biden won because of fraud. but i don’t know what trump may have access to. IF he has a legitimate gripe ( huge “if”) he’s entitled to pursue it. if he doesn’t have. legitimate gripe he should shut up and concede.

please point to one syllable in my response that anyone would say is a tin foil hat conspiracy theory.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Biggest dodge Jim, what the F does Hilary have to do with Trump stalling and potentially loosing needless American lives due to COVID or some other domestic or international threat the incoming administration should be read in on. Your stuck I get it but Trump and and that two faced flipper Lindsey are the opposite of Patriots.