| |
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
| Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
01-20-2016, 12:51 PM
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,182
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
The way I read it, they have accused her of having emails on her server, that were top secret at the time they were received by her server.
|
The letter from the IG simply states that analysts believe there is classified information in some emails. It doesn't say anything about when the information was classified.
Why be so vague? Because it's LEAK CRACK. |
|
|
|
|
|
01-20-2016, 01:21 PM
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,429
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
The letter from the IG simply states that analysts believe there is classified information in some emails. It doesn't say anything about when the information was classified.
Why be so vague? Because it's LEAK CRACK.
|
I'm not talking about the letter, I am talking about what Fox says was leaked to them. Which, of course, may turn out to be b.s. Or not. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
01-20-2016, 01:50 PM
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
ha ha ha ha... 
Clinton Campaign Accuses Obama-Appointed IG of Conspiring with GOP on E-mail Report
http://www.nationalreview.com/node/430061/print
she's a special sort of insane... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
01-20-2016, 02:08 PM
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,429
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw
|
Spence, from Scott's link...
"The Politico report Fallon (Clinton spokesman) cites claimed that intelligence sources had determined that no “top secret” e-mails were discovered on Clinton’s e-mail server. It was immediately challenged by intelligence-community officials, and Politico itself backtracked in a December 15 story, admitting that two e-mails were, in fact, considered “top secret” at the time they were sent and retained by Clinton. Fallon offered no new evidence to contradict that assertion."
Listen to the bell, Spence, it tolls for thee she. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
01-20-2016, 07:30 PM
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,182
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
Spence, from Scott's link...
"The Politico report Fallon (Clinton spokesman) cites claimed that intelligence sources had determined that no “top secret” e-mails were discovered on Clinton’s e-mail server. It was immediately challenged by intelligence-community officials, and Politico itself backtracked in a December 15 story, admitting that two e-mails were, in fact, considered “top secret” at the time they were sent and retained by Clinton. Fallon offered no new evidence to contradict that assertion."
Listen to the bell, Spence, it tolls for thee she.
|
Issue already addressed in multiple posts above. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
01-22-2016, 08:20 AM
|
#6
|
|
Certifiable Intertidal Anguiologist
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Somewhere between OOB & west of Watch Hill
Posts: 34,992
|
Actually, rule #1 she broke was she created, authorized, and used an unsafe and unregulated system for storing classified information setup and supported by people/organizations that were unauthorized, trained, or properly equipped to maintain such a system.
Even if it was legal (it was not) the simple fact of her running the situation the way she did on a home private email server allowed lots of bad guys to read our mail. Maybe Obama would have had great foreign policy of the Russians and Socialist Chinese were not reading our mail.
|
~Fix the Bait~ ~Pogies Forever~
Striped Bass Fishing - All Stripers
Kobayashi Maru Election - there is no way to win.
Apocalypse is Coming:
|
|
|
|
01-22-2016, 09:06 AM
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,182
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnR
Actually, rule #1 she broke was she created, authorized, and used an unsafe and unregulated system for storing classified information setup and supported by people/organizations that were unauthorized, trained, or properly equipped to maintain such a system.
|
You're assuming she intended to store classified information which she clearly didn't intend to nor does it appear that she did.
Quote:
|
Even if it was legal (it was not) the simple fact of her running the situation the way she did on a home private email server allowed lots of bad guys to read our mail. Maybe Obama would have had great foreign policy of the Russians and Socialist Chinese were not reading our mail.
|
Well, I believe the Justice Department has already said it wasn't illegal. I've not hear anyone claim it was hacked although it's certainly possible. But if she was using secure systems for classified communications it's not even clear if they could have gained meaningful insights.
Here's the thing that most people are missing. Had she not been using her personal server she would have been using state.gov. All this inter-agency squabbling over classification would have been exactly the same...and they've been having a terrible time keeping the Russians out of that system.
While I agree it would have been proper to use the work system for work, there' doesn't appear have been any legal or otherwise damage done. We'll see what the Feds say... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
01-20-2016, 06:40 PM
|
#8
|
|
Registered Grandpa
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: east coast
Posts: 8,592
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
The letter from the IG simply states that analysts believe there is classified information in some emails. It doesn't say anything about when the information was classified.
|
Spence, did they simply state that Hilary deleted 34,000 e mails that she deemed personal?
Guess she had a lot of yoga classes.  |
" Choose Life "
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:01 AM.
|
| |
Hybrid Mode