Paul Pelosi attack

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

I showed his actions are directly tied to lies by Trump, his admin. and many Rs, not policy decisions. The guys who shot giffords and scalise did it bc of their policies - not because they were brainwashed by Trump or Hillary.

Paul, you said the difference was that previous shootings were based on policy, and this one was based on the lie of election fraud.

So if we somehow found out that the 2020 election was stolen, you'd have a better opinion of the guy who attacked Pelosi?

"Ok douchebag"

But I'm angry.

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

Paul, you said the difference was that previous shootings were based on policy, and this one was based on the lie of election fraud.

So if we somehow found out that the 2020 election was stolen, you'd have a better opinion of the guy who attacked Pelosi?It wouldn't change my opinion of him. What would change is that I wouldn't blame Trump, his admin. and many Rs.


"Ok douchebag"If you in anyway thinks saying "Have fun with that" isn't rude as sheet you better ask someone.

But I'm angry.

NM

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

NM

Trying to follow you...

You blame Trump for the Pelosi attack, because Trump invented the lie that the attacker was motivated by. Even though Trump never told anyone to attack Pelosi due to election fraud.

But you won't say anything about Schumer and Kavanaugh, even though Schumer explicitly threatened Kavanaugh. You give Schumer a pass because Kavanaugh actually did vote to overturn Roe?

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

Trying to follow you...

You blame Trump for the Pelosi attackThe blame lies with the individual who did it. But Trump and the Rs deserve criticism for making up a lie that lead a damaged idiot to attack Pelosi, because Trump invented the lie that the attacker was motivated by. Even though Trump never told anyone to attack Pelosi due to election fraud.

But you won't say anything about Schumer and Kavanaugh, even though Schumer explicitly threatened KavanaughIt there is a threat K can go to the police.. You give Schumer a pass because Kavanaugh actually did vote to overturn Roe?

That is right.

“And we fight. We fight like hell And if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.”
“All of us here today do not want to see our election victory stolen by emboldened radical-left Democrats, which is what they’re doing … We will never give up, we will never concede. It doesn’t happen. You don’t concede when there’s theft involved.”
“Our country has had enough. We will not take it anymore and that’s what this is all about … We will stop the steal.”
“Because you’ll never take back our country with weakness, you have to show strength and you have to be strong.”


So do you have a link to Hillary's statement?

[scottw]

Originally Posted by PaulS

“And we fight. We fight like hell And if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.”
“All of us here today do not want to see our election victory stolen by emboldened radical-left Democrats, which is what they’re doing … We will never give up, we will never concede. It doesn’t happen. You don’t concede when there’s theft involved.”
“Our country has had enough. We will not take it anymore and that’s what this is all about … We will stop the steal.”
“Because you’ll never take back our country with weakness, you have to show strength and you have to be strong.”

is this hillary or al gore?

[Jim in CT]

[QUOTE=PaulS;1235002]That is right.

“And we fight. We fight like hell And if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.”
“All of us here today do not want to see our election victory stolen by emboldened radical-left Democrats, which is what they’re doing … We will never give up, we will never concede. It doesn’t happen. You don’t concede when there’s theft involved.”
“Our country has had enough. We will not take it anymore and that’s what this is all about … We will stop the steal.”
“Because you’ll never take back our country with weakness, you have to show strength and you have to be strong.”

Schumer gets a complete free pass for explicitly threatening Kavanaugh. But you're not partisan, no sirr-eee.

Video of Hilary...

[PaulS]

[QUOTE=Jim in CT;1235010]

Originally Posted by PaulS

That is right.

“And we fight. We fight like hell And if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.”
“All of us here today do not want to see our election victory stolen by emboldened radical-left Democrats, which is what they’re doing … We will never give up, we will never concede. It doesn’t happen. You don’t concede when there’s theft involved.”
“Our country has had enough. We will not take it anymore and that’s what this is all about … We will stop the steal.”
“Because you’ll never take back our country with weakness, you have to show strength and you have to be strong.”

Schumer gets a complete free pass for explicitly threatening Kavanaugh. But you're not partisan, no sirr-eee.

Video of Hilary...

Thank you posting. I listened to the first 2:30 and here is what she said.

“Right wing extremists already have a plan to steal the next presidential election. And they’re not making a secret of it. The right wing-controlled Supreme Court may be poised to rule on giving state legislatures the power to overturn presidential elections, if that happens the 2024 election could be determined by Republican-controlled state legislatures rather than the popular vote or the “anachronistic electoral college” but by states legislatures.

So everything she said is all true. How is throwing out the votes of the population and having the state legislature saying who won not "stealing" an election? Isn't that what you hear Russia doing and 3rd world countries do, for which we rightly criticize?

[Jim in CT]

[QUOTE=PaulS;1235016]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

Thank you posting. I listened to the first 2:30 and here is what she said.

“Right wing extremists already have a plan to steal the next presidential election. And they’re not making a secret of it. The right wing-controlled Supreme Court may be poised to rule on giving state legislatures the power to overturn presidential elections, if that happens the 2024 election could be determined by Republican-controlled state legislatures rather than the popular vote or the “anachronistic electoral college” but by states legislatures.

So everything she said is all true. How is throwing out the votes of the population and having the state legislature saying who won not "stealing" an election? Isn't that what you hear Russia doing and 3rd world countries do, for which we rightly criticize?

ok einstein. her baseless accusations of prospective theft that hasn’t happened yet, that’s ok

it’s only bad when republicans make baseless accusations of theft.

having legislatures certify elections is stealing, if they undo the results of the election. if they just certify what actually happened, how is that theft, Einstein?

everything, absolutely everything is ok when liberals do it. Schumer can explicitly threaten a supreme
court judge. no problem, he’s a democrat!!kavanaugh can just call the police.

that comment, that schumer didn’t do anything wrong because kavanaugh can call police, is when your credibility joined Pete’s and wayne’s.

using your logic, pelosi could have just called the police. heck they were already watching his house, they just missed it. using your logic, it’s not trumps fault.

[scottw]

Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS

"Ok douchebag"

[/QUOTE]

Mr. Civility is never going to be a moderator.....