Stacey Abrams still saying racism stole election

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

the tr#^&#^&#^&#^&#^&g company admitted that drivers often switched their assignments, meaning it would have been reasonable to accommodate the men's request, rather than firing them.

Because under the law it states

Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, employers must make accommodations for workers' religious beliefs unless doing so would impose "undue hardship" on the business.


Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

ANd gay couples have other bakers, photographers, they can choose from.

So explain why that's a hardship. I'll wait.

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

ANd gay couples have other bakers, photographers, they can choose from.

So explain why that's a hardship. I'll wait.

keep playing Dump

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

keep playing Dump

SO I asked an obvious question, you knew I had a valid point, but you can't admit that ever, so you ignore my question and lob a vague insult and scurry off.

Whew.

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

SO I asked an obvious question, you knew I had a valid point, but you can't admit that ever, so you ignore my question and lob a vague insult and scurry off.

Whew.

it's not an insult... Playing Dumb is not the same as calling you dumb


it's your inability to work out answers. that need no assistance ..

not sure how customer and business owner or Business and employee, cause you so much confusion? When the Law provided clear distinctions

yet

The US Department of Justice Department is suing the owners of a Rapid City, South Dakota hotel for saying on social media and elsewhere that it would not serve Native Americans.

The DOJ says the owners’ policies and practices violate the civil rights act.

In March, an owner of the Grand Gateway Hotel and Cheers Sports Lounge posted on Facebook that Natives were no longer allowed at the hotel and bar following an overnight shooting in their building. Days after, Native Americans tried booking rooms at the hotel twice and were allegedly denied service.

it's not hard to see which party supports these ideas and Why

Freedoms for me not for thee ...

lets see if religious excuses surface to defend these actions

https://listen.sdpb.org/crime-courts...y-hotel-owners

[scottw]

Originally Posted by wdmso

keep playing Dump

this one is going in the Greatest Hits Collection

[wdmso]

Natives were no longer allowed at the hotel and bar following an overnight shooting in their building

what I find comical is

Open Carry is legal. South Dakota is a permitless carry state. Anyone 18 or older who can legally possess a firearm can carry openly or concealed in South Dakota without a permit/license.

and a shooting outrages them?

[Pete F.]

The Federalist: “the wholesale destruction of our traditions and the looming implosion of Western civilization” requires a shift to fascism: “The government will have to become, in the hands of conservatives, an instrument of renewal in American life … a blunt instrument indeed”
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

forcing christians to participate in gay

How is someone buying a cake twisted into forcing.

The baker to participate in someone’s
wedding ?

So if I sell you flowers am I participating in your wedding?

How about a rental place who rented chairs tables and a tent . Are they also participating in the wedding

I asked before but got the usual fluff

So now republicans and conservatives twist and create a new meaning of participation

To fit their narrative of religion is under attack
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

forcing christians to participate in gay

How is someone buying a cake twisted into forcing.

The baker to participate in someone’s
wedding ?

So if I sell you flowers am I participating in your wedding?

How about a rental place who rented chairs tables and a tent . Are they also participating in the wedding

I asked before but got the usual fluff

So now republicans and conservatives twist and create a new meaning of participation

To fit their narrative of religion is under attack
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

if you bake a cake for a wedding, you might think you’re participating in the wedding. the cake is a part of the wedding. the baker is contributing to the wedding.

how about the photographer? is he a component of the wedding?

if i said 2 + 2 =4, you’d say no it doesn’t.

when democrats say catholics can’t be supreme
court justices, that’s attacking religion.

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

if you bake a cake for a wedding, you might think you’re participating in the wedding. the cake is a part of the wedding. the baker is contributing to the wedding.

how about the photographer? is he a component of the wedding?

if i said 2 + 2 =4, you’d say no it doesn’t.

when democrats say catholics can’t be supreme
court justices, that’s attacking religion.

So you still can’t tell us how baking a cake (service) is participating I am shocked

when democrats say catholics can’t be supreme
court justices, that’s attacking religion

You live in a fantasy Jim

five, maybe six, Catholic conservative justices and one Catholic liberal justice (Sonia Sotomayor), seven out of nine justices are of the same religion.

As is the POTUS

So much for your attack on religion


next you’ll be telling me someone robs a Bank in a Ford Mustang !

Ford motor company participated in the robbery
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

So you still can’t tell us how baking a cake (service) is participating I am shocked

when democrats say catholics can’t be supreme
court justices, that’s attacking religion

You live in a fantasy Jim

five, maybe six, Catholic conservative justices and one Catholic liberal justice (Sonia Sotomayor), seven out of nine justices are of the same religion.

As is the POTUS

So much for your attack on religion


next you’ll be telling me someone robs a Bank in a Ford Mustang !

Ford motor company participated in the robbery
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

i didn’t tell you how. you just won’t admit it because it does t advance your ideology.

someone who provides a key item for the wedding that’s enjoyed by all guests of the wedding and is paid by the people who’s for the wedding, is contributing to the wedding, as is the DJ, photographer, florist, etc.

does anyone who disagrees with you, ever have a valid opinion? Ever?

You’re saying the left didn’t object to Barrett’s catholicism?

https://www.dailysignal.com/2020/10/...her-faith/amp/

[scottw]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

does anyone who disagrees with you, ever have a valid opinion? Ever?

that's a firm no...

[scottw]

Originally Posted by wdmso

So now republicans and conservatives twist and create a new meaning of participation

To fit their narrative

Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

leftists never twist and create new meanings for words to fit their narratives....well, almost never...actually...regularly

in the words of PaulS...."they do it 1000 times more but you are upset about this"

[Jim in CT]

wayne, when engaged couples prepare. budget for the wedding ( which you were opposed to until obama and hilary told you to support), why do they include money for the baker, florist, DJ, limo driver, etc? BevUse those people are part of the wedding.

you are the one trying to redefine “participate”.

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

wayne, when engaged couples prepare. budget for the wedding ( which you were opposed to until obama and hilary told you to support), why do they include money for the baker, florist, DJ, limo driver, etc? BevUse those people are part of the wedding.

you are the one trying to redefine “participate”.

You must run on a merry go round.

Jim they are services not participating. In the sense normal people define participate in one’s wedding like bridesmaid and grooms men and guest whom are invited ..

A travel agent books my Trip he’s not participating in my vacation

you are the one trying to redefine “participate”

Ya ok
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Originally Posted by wdmso

You must run on a merry go round.


Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

why are you trying to redefine a merry-go-round?....it's a "ride"...you don't run on it...you sit and go around and around like your tortured logic...sheesh

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by scottw

why are you trying to redefine a merry-go-round?....it's a "ride"...you don't run on it...you sit and go around and around like your tortured logic...sheesh

So they all go around on their own ?

When I was a kid the ones in my town were kid powered
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

Just use a different baker. Why is that hard? This isn’t about tolerance. it’s about totalitarianism.

That’s your comment Jim

My guess if the baker claimed he was booked or on vacation and unable to accommodate them.

I am sure they would have found another baker..

But the response I don’t make cakes for Fags or gays the meaning is the same

It Changes the land scape a bit..

Conservatives have been twisting religious freedoms to now cover discrimination denial of services it’s ever expanding

Or you can start your own It even has pictures

https://www.wikihow.com/Start-a-Religion
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Just use a different baker.

that's what I'd do, you really don't want the people preparing your food to be upset with you....

[wdmso]

https://www.aclu.org/issues/religiou...n-discriminate
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

if the Christian baker went to a flower shop owned by two gay guys and asked them to make a big bouquet with a cross on it for their snake handling ceremony at the tent meeting and the gay florists said sorry we can't support that with our products for personal reasons...I'd tell the Christian baker to just go find another florist

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by scottw

if the Christian baker went to a flower shop owned by two gay guys and asked them to make a big bouquet with a cross on it for their snake handling ceremony at the tent meeting and the gay florists said sorry we can't support that with our products for personal reasons...I'd tell the Christian baker to just go find another florist

Not really the point is it
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[scottw]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Not really the point is it
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

it's exactly the point....

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by scottw

it's exactly the point....

yes it’s exactly the point. gay activists say they just want to be left alone to live,,but these cases prove that’s not the case. they want to punish those who also just want to be left alone to live as they see fit.

how many voting records need to be broken in GA before they stop talking about voter suppression?