Cairo

[UserRemoved]

"U.S. President Barack Obama called on Egyptian authorities Friday to refrain from violence and to reverse any actions they have taken to limit access to the internet in the wake of protests there."

THAT'S THE BEST HE CAN DO?



he's supermAn

what a fin schmuck

[JohnR]

Originally Posted by Saltys

"U.S. President Barack Obama called on Egyptian authorities Friday to refrain from violence and to reverse any actions they have taken to limit access to the internet in the wake of protests there."

THAT'S THE BEST HE CAN DO?



he's supermAn

what a fin schmuck

I'm no Obama apologist but not much he can do. He can shut up Joe Biden from making more dumba$$ comments.

Some other interesting analysis: NightWatch 20110128 - KGS

If you are interested in stuff that happened in the course of the night, Nightwatch tends to be better than CNN

[Raven]

you forgot the hyphen between F and IN
thereby insulting all manner of fishes ! DO that AGAIN!
and ALL my chipmunks go to your HOUSE !

[Raven]

it APPEARS that the TUNISIAN demonstration
started the whole thing and because of the INTERNET
postings on TWITTER and or Facebook and subsequent video's
launched it...

A small world we're in now EH?

Here we have this MARVELOUS tool for
world wide communication and scientific advancement
yet it is FUELING the violence of "Change" instead.

MR OBAMA , could you please "change" this.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by JohnR

I'm no Obama apologist but not much he can do.

Yes there is. He could do what Regan did when citizens (subjects) of the USSR started protestring, and Regan made it clear that freeedom, and not tyranny, is what's best for the world. Regan had no problem calling the Soviet Union "evil", he did it all the time. And just like today, all the liberals told him not to say it. Regan realized that battle, the Cold War, was going to have a winner and a loser, and he made it crystal clear where we would be when it was over. And he was right.

Real, decisive leadership involves calling a spade a spade. We elected a guy who likes to vote "present", instead of yea or nea, on any tough issue. Obama is a joke. And what no one is saying is that Hilary has to be the worst Secstate of the last 100 years. In terms of foreign policy, they can't get one right even by accident.

Protesters get slaughtered in Iran, Obama/Clinton don't utter a peep. China refuses any concessions. European nations refuse to send additional troops to Afghanistan, and they refuse to finance their own stimulus packages. Iran gets closer and closer to nukes. The North Koreans are running amuck.

They are an absolute joke, we'd be better off with Abbott and Costello. Obama believes, he genuinely believes, he can charm all our enemies into liking us. If only that were so, but it ain't...

[JohnR]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

Yes there is. He could do what Regan did when citizens (subjects) of the USSR started protestring, and Regan made it clear that freeedom, and not tyranny, is what's best for the world. Regan had no problem calling the Soviet Union "evil", he did it all the time. And just like today, all the liberals told him not to say it. Regan realized that battle, the Cold War, was going to have a winner and a loser, and he made it crystal clear where we would be when it was over. And he was right.

Real, decisive leadership involves calling a spade a spade. We elected a guy who likes to vote "present", instead of yea or nea, on any tough issue. Obama is a joke. And what no one is saying is that Hilary has to be the worst Secstate of the last 100 years. In terms of foreign policy, they can't get one right even by accident.

Protesters get slaughtered in Iran, Obama/Clinton don't utter a peep. China refuses any concessions. European nations refuse to send additional troops to Afghanistan, and they refuse to finance their own stimulus packages. Iran gets closer and closer to nukes. The North Koreans are running amuck.

They are an absolute joke, we'd be better off with Abbott and Costello. Obama believes, he genuinely believes, he can charm all our enemies into liking us. If only that were so, but it ain't...

Far different situation wrt Iron Curtain. And yes, he can certainly say a lot but how much can he do?

I know this won't work because it is far too over simplified
Backs Hosni - Hosni fails, IB gains status / face
Backs Protesters - looses Army

Now if he backs the Army, and the Army can move Egypt more democratic which still marginalizes IB, there is a chance. But if the economy on the street doesn't improve...

In the meantime there will likely be pull among the three lands that are trying to be / traditionally have been the center of gravity of the muslim world; Turkey, Iran, Egypt...

While I would love to see a sweep of real democracy across the Arab / Persian world, with functioning democracies and all, we are talking about the Arab world, perhaps the most (2nd most?) dysfunctional region in the world. South America has been transitioning for 100 something years and isn't done with all its past and current fall backs.

How could the Arab world do it sooner or safer?

We live in interesting times.

/ramble

[spence]

Originally Posted by JohnR

Far different situation wrt Iron Curtain. And yes, he can certainly say a lot but how much can he do?

I think it's quite different. There's not a lot of love for the USA among the Egyptian street. If Obama is seen to be taking sides it's just going to empower groups like the Muslim Brotherhood who can point to US interference over the decades as the root of their economic problems.

So much of Reagan's rhetoric towards the USSR was simply political cover here at home while he actively worked with the Russians to negotiate deals as the cold war was winding down. Russia was falling apart and Reagan was looking for the best deal he could get. From what I've read both he and Gorbachev wanted to be seen as peacemakers.

I don't think there's any parallel between the situations Obama faces today...

No matter what happens in public, behind the scene I'm sure we're backing the military. I was reading up on how tight we actually are and it's quite dramatic.

-spence

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

I think it's quite different. There's not a lot of love for the USA among the Egyptian street. If Obama is seen to be taking sides it's just going to empower groups like the Muslim Brotherhood who can point to US interference over the decades as the root of their economic problems.

So much of Reagan's rhetoric towards the USSR was simply political cover here at home while he actively worked with the Russians to negotiate deals as the cold war was winding down. Russia was falling apart and Reagan was looking for the best deal he could get. From what I've read both he and Gorbachev wanted to be seen as peacemakers.

I don't think there's any parallel between the situations Obama faces today...

No matter what happens in public, behind the scene I'm sure we're backing the military. I was reading up on how tight we actually are and it's quite dramatic.

-spence

Spence, never you mind that the entire rational world credits Regan and Pope John Paul as being the 2 folks who had the most to do with not only ending the Cold War, but making sure that the good guys won. You cannot accept that, because Regan had an (R) after his name, and that's all that matters to you.

Regan did more than spout rhetoric. He led a massive military buildup that the Soviets couldn't match. His rhetoric also was very inspirational to oppressed dissidents like Lech Walesa, who were motivated by Regan's encouragement to continue to protest. Regan's actions put enormous pressure on a Soviet system that was, as you said, crumbling.

Obama, on the other hand, offers absolutely zip to political dissidents who are struggling for freedom. Obama will not stick his neck out unless he has to. Proof? All those "present" votes in the Illinois state legislature (he voted "present" more times than anyone else).

The extent that brainwashed liberals will go to, to distort reality and revise history, is entertaining.

[scottw]

Originally Posted by JohnR

I'm no Obama apologist but not much he can do.

"YES...WE....AHHHHHH....HE...CAN!"
"YES...WE....AHHHHHH....HE...CAN!"
"YES...WE....AHHHHHH....HE...CAN!"
"YES...WE....AHHHHHH....HE...CAN!"
"YES...WE....AHHHHHH....HE...CAN!"

AHHHH...just words

for a guy that has so much to say so frequently, he has surprisingly little to say when people are actually hoping he'll say something....