|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
02-01-2022, 07:21 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
well, as a lower court judge, kavanaugh had 13 opinions get reviewed by SCOTUS, they affirmed 12 and reversed 1.
Sotomayor had 5 opinions get reviewed and 2 got overturned, one unanimously.
What does that suggest, Pete?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Washington (CNN)Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor made a significant false claim on Friday about Covid-19's impact on children.
I bet Kavanaugh rolled his eyes when she said this 
|
|
|
|
02-01-2022, 08:40 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,443
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw
Washington (CNN)Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor made a significant false claim on Friday about Covid-19's impact on children.
I bet Kavanaugh rolled his eyes when she said this 
|
She also famously said this about judges of different gender and race...
"a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life."
She said that white men have inferior life experiences compared to female Latinas. Saying something that bigoted, would get you instantly banned from jury duty. But apparently it doesn't preclude you from being on the Supreme Court for life.
|
|
|
|
02-01-2022, 09:00 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,447
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
She also famously said this about judges of different gender and race...
"a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life."
She said that white men have inferior life experiences compared to female Latinas. Saying something that bigoted, would get you instantly banned from jury duty. But apparently it doesn't preclude you from being on the Supreme Court for life.
|
Again Jim post this again with no context
a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn't lived that life
white male who hasn't lived that life
Not sure Jim how you twisted that comment to be bigoted
Oh wait I do she called out bias
And that triggered your white victimhood
How dare a person of color speak the Truth
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
02-01-2022, 08:51 AM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,447
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
well, as a lower court judge, kavanaugh had 13 opinions get reviewed by SCOTUS, they affirmed 12 and reversed 1.
Sotomayor had 5 opinions get reviewed and 2 got overturned, one unanimously.
What does that suggest, Pete?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Jim leaves out she ruled on over 300 cases but Amy 75 overall
Brett at least did 12 years on the bench
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
02-01-2022, 12:42 PM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,443
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
Jim leaves out she ruled on over 300 cases but Amy 75 overall
Brett at least did 12 years on the bench
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
That's worth noting, sure.
How many times was Barrett overturned, unanimously, on appeal?
How many times did Barrett say that her race and gender result in more wisdom than any other race or gender?
|
|
|
|
02-01-2022, 03:13 PM
|
#6
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Georgetown MA
Posts: 18,223
|
Ummm...Sotomayor's race is Caucasian, she may not be Western European Caucasian, but she is Caucasian
Her ethnicity is Hispanic, but she is a cracker
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
02-01-2022, 03:18 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Libtardia
Posts: 21,715
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman
Ummm...Sotomayor's race is Caucasian, she may not be Western European Caucasian, but she is Caucasian
Her ethnicity is Hispanic, but she is a cracker
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Wow
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
02-01-2022, 03:23 PM
|
#8
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Georgetown MA
Posts: 18,223
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebe
Wow
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
What's wow about it, 80% of Puerto Rico is white. She is Puerto Rican.
Are Italians POC's, are Greeks POC's, are Turks POC's? They are darker skinned than Western Europe, but they are still Caucasian by race.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
"If you're arguing with an idiot, make sure he isn't doing the same thing."
|
|
|
02-01-2022, 03:25 PM
|
#9
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Georgetown MA
Posts: 18,223
|
https://welcome.topuertorico.org/fastfacts.shtml
Ethnic composition: white (mostly Spanish origin) 80.5%, black 8%, Amerindian 0.4%, Asian 0.2%, mixed and other 10.9%.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
02-01-2022, 08:54 PM
|
#10
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Libtardia
Posts: 21,715
|
Are you sure she isn’t Honkey and not Cracker?
|
|
|
|
02-01-2022, 09:30 PM
|
#11
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Georgetown MA
Posts: 18,223
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebe
Are you sure she isn’t Honkey and not Cracker?
|
That is so 70's
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
"If you're arguing with an idiot, make sure he isn't doing the same thing."
|
|
|
02-02-2022, 09:24 AM
|
#12
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,313
|
Biden should have just asked the federalist society to draw up a list and picked from that.
|
|
|
|
02-02-2022, 09:45 AM
|
#13
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,443
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
Biden should have just asked the federalist society to draw up a list and picked from that.
|
and regardless of who Biden picks ( which won’t change the political
makeup of the court so who really cares), maybe the gop can drag some broken person out to say they were raped by the nominee.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
02-02-2022, 10:02 AM
|
#14
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,313
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
and regardless of who Biden picks ( which won’t change the political
makeup of the court so who really cares), maybe the gop can drag some broken person out to say they were raped by the nominee.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Shows the hypocrisy of the R.
Yes, let's investigate - but do a real investigation.
|
|
|
|
02-02-2022, 10:08 AM
|
#15
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
I think if Jim wrote "I had an omelette for breakfast"
paul would respond
"Shows the hypocrisy of the R."
|
|
|
|
02-02-2022, 10:17 AM
|
#16
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,443
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
Shows the hypocrisy of the R.
Yes, let's investigate - but do a real investigation.
|
it’s “hypocrisy” if the gop exactly replicates the democrats tactics. i see.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
02-02-2022, 10:27 AM
|
#17
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,313
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
it’s “hypocrisy” if the gop exactly replicates the democrats tactics. i see.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
So somehow Biden announced this before Trump kissed the federalists societies butt and promised to pick someone from the list they produced or before Reagan said he would hire a woman 
|
|
|
|
02-02-2022, 10:18 AM
|
#18
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,443
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
Shows the hypocrisy of the R.
Yes, let's investigate - but do a real investigation.
|
There was an allegation against Kavanaugh, and also against Biden. Should we investigate both? or only investigate allegations against republicans?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
02-02-2022, 10:31 AM
|
#19
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,313
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
There was an allegation against Kavanaugh, and also against Biden. Should we investigate both? or only investigate allegations against republicans?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
Shows the hypocrisy of the R.
Yes, let's investigate - but do a real investigation.
|
I'm guessing you missed my response otherwise why ask about investigating both?
Hard to investigate a President but if the SC nominee has credible claims against them then by all means investigate - and as I said a "but do a real investigation" not the shame the Rs did with Kavanaugh
|
|
|
|
02-02-2022, 11:07 AM
|
#20
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,443
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
I'm guessing you missed my response otherwise why ask about investigating both?
Hard to investigate a President but if the SC nominee has credible claims against them then by all means investigate - and as I said a "but do a real investigation" not the shame the Rs did with Kavanaugh
|
“credible”. yup. a very broken person making politically convenient, yet unbelievably vague allegations with massive holes in it.
Why did Feinstein wait until
the very end of Kavanaugh’s first round of hearings, to break the story? She had the allegation all along. Other than for political drama and political impact, what possible reason was there for her to sit on it for a week?
i don’t know when the rape happened, i do t know where it happened, i never told
anyone about it, i don’t know how i got home, can’t name a single
other person who was at the party, but i know who did it.
reeks of credibility.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
02-02-2022, 09:52 AM
|
#21
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
Biden should have just asked the federalist society to draw up a list and picked from that.
|
well, since we know women can have penises and democrats like to dress in black face...there are a lot of possibilities 
|
|
|
|
02-02-2022, 09:56 AM
|
#22
|
Very Grumpy bay man
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 10,887
|
You guys have now risen to a new level of stupidity. 
|
No boat, back in the suds. 
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:02 AM.
|
| |