|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
09-24-2020, 04:56 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,429
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
Jim 20 rds fired indiscriminately and they killed a defenseless women you can't goto prision if you never make it to court . Its is a crime their no disputing that killing someone with your car is a crime it can be determined to be an accident
But 20 rounds randomly fired into an apartment is no accident or police Training
|
and they don’t go to court, unless they’re arrested for a crime.
why can’t you guys ever answer a question? what’s the crime?
is there any chance you junk she’s be dead, if the guy with her didn’t shoot a cop? he shot a cop. he may we’ll have not known they were cops ( which means he may not have committed a crime). but if you shout a cop, a hail of gunfire is coming back your way. that's how it works. you think they should
have shot the gun out of his hand in that moment?
how many rounds are cops allowed to fire back when one of them is shot and severs an artery in his leg? is the crime that the woman died? or how many rounds they fired?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
09-24-2020, 05:42 PM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,183
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
and they don’t go to court, unless they’re arrested for a crime.
why can’t you guys ever answer a question? what’s the crime?
is there any chance you junk she’s be dead, if the guy with her didn’t shoot a cop? he shot a cop. he may we’ll have not known they were cops ( which means he may not have committed a crime). but if you shout a cop, a hail of gunfire is coming back your way. that's how it works. you think they should
have shot the gun out of his hand in that moment?
how many rounds are cops allowed to fire back when one of them is shot and severs an artery in his leg? is the crime that the woman died? or how many rounds they fired?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Here’s a simple question for you. If putting 3 rounds into an adjacent apartment could get you 15 years why would putting 6 rounds into a living innocent person be completely overlooked?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
09-24-2020, 06:37 PM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,429
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Here’s a simple question for you. If putting 3 rounds into an adjacent apartment could get you 15 years why would putting 6 rounds into a living innocent person be completely overlooked?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
I’ll answer when you answer. which you apparently won’t, because you can’t without looking bonkers.
do you, spence, think it’s a criminal offense to return fire when shot at, and accidentally miss your target?
answer that question as i asked it, and i’ll happily answer yours.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
09-25-2020, 02:26 AM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Here’s a simple question for you. If putting 3 rounds into an adjacent apartment could get you 15 years why would putting 6 rounds into a living innocent person be completely overlooked?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
the cop that was charged was in the parking lot....the cops that were not charged were inside the building, one was shot both returned fire, they had cause to discharge their weapons....didn't you just tell Jim to do some research or fact check himself before posting?
|
|
|
|
09-25-2020, 09:21 AM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,429
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by scottw
the cop that was charged was in the parking lot....the cops that were not charged were inside the building, one was shot both returned fire, they had cause to discharge their weapons....didn't you just tell Jim to do some research or fact check himself before posting?
|
To them, "research" consists of concocting a tale that best supports The Narrative. They're possessed by The Narrative, enslaved by it.
|
|
|
|
09-24-2020, 07:20 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,138
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
and they don’t go to court, unless they’re arrested for a crime.
why can’t you guys ever answer a question? what’s the crime?
is there any chance you junk she’s be dead, if the guy with her didn’t shoot a cop? he shot a cop. he may we’ll have not known they were cops ( which means he may not have committed a crime). but if you shout a cop, a hail of gunfire is coming back your way. that's how it works. you think they should
have shot the gun out of his hand in that moment?
how many rounds are cops allowed to fire back when one of them is shot and severs an artery in his leg? is the crime that the woman died? or how many rounds they fired?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Jim the crime is killing an innocent women
How it it a crime
By firing indiscriminately beacause someone fired a shot.
So your logic if police are fired apon from a crowd of protester they are justified in firing indiscriminately into the Crowd.. with out positively IDing the shooter... see now why police need to be better retrained before discharging their weapons .. because if your off 2 inchs at 20ft wheres that round going at 300ft.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
09-24-2020, 07:23 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,429
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
Jim the crime is killing an innocent women
How it it a crime
By firing indiscriminately beacause someone fired a shot.
So your logic if police are fired apon from a crowd of protester they are justified in firing indiscriminately into the Crowd.. with out positively IDing the shooter... see now why police need to be better retrained before discharging their weapons .. because if you off 2 inchs at 20ft wheres that round going at 300ft.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
it’s a crime, punishable by prison, to kill an innocent person accidentally while returning fire?
fortunately, that’s not a crime.
the need for better training is a good idea. charging them with murder? bonkers.
anyway, as always, we see what happens when liberals don’t get their way.
oh hey! since you said there isn’t enough time
to look into a S.C. nominee, look at the timeline for Ginsburgs confirmation.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:11 AM.
|
| |