Bolton pegging Floridaman

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

Pete, i immediately concede Trump gets an F on debt.

Now, please tell us why it was OK for obama to put kids in cages, but wrong for trump to do it.

If I said obama was bad for running up the debt but i have Trump a pass, Id be a hypocrite. I’ve said 100 times he’s failing on the debt.

You are the hypocrite, giving Obama a pass for caging kids but bashing Trump for putting kids in the same exact cages that obama used.

It was Nobel Peace Prize- worthy when Obama did it, and a crime against humanity when Trump does it.

No one cared when Obama
did it, and for damn sure no one said “it’s ok at these numbers, but President Obama if you increase the number of
kids you put in cages, then i will oppose you.”

Not one single human being said that. You’re saying it now to justify the naked hypocrisy.

Do you ever get tired of getting bitch slapped around?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Originally Posted by Pete F.

You're in the wrong thread, so tell me did you work hard to be this much of a moron, or are you the product of a combination of enthusiastic inbreeding and a mother who spent her pregnancy huffing paint thinner while servicing her other clients in a truckstop bathroom?

I bumped it for you and you've answered my question

[Pete F.]

You're like a dog with a pull toy, go read the other threads..........

I'm not going to spend the time to put up the documents on the difference between the previous admins and this one.

He'll be gone soon, he's backed up to the sea right now.

"If you lie to the court, there are penalties for that."

Former federal prosecutor Andrew Weissmann explains the possible downsides for the White House if it pursues the claim of executive privilege

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

You're like a dog with a pull toy, go read the other threads..........

I'm not going to spend the time to put up the documents on the difference between the previous admins and this one.

He'll be gone soon, he's backed up to the sea right now.

"If you lie to the court, there are penalties for that."

Former federal prosecutor Andrew Weissmann explains the possible downsides for the White House if it pursues the claim of executive privilege

i read the other threads. Nowhere did you state what the maximum number of allowable cagings is, before one becomes a
monster.

i’ll just assume
that you don’t have an answer, but you know it’s one more than obama did.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

i read the other threads. Nowhere did you state what the maximum number of allowable cagings is, before one becomes a
monster.

i’ll just assume
that you don’t have an answer, but you know it’s one more than obama did.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

It’s choosing to take ALL the children from the parents, every single one that’s the problem.
You’ve said before that they deserve it. Shouldn’t have brought their children.
Go chase your tail........
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

It’s choosing to take ALL the children from the parents, every single one that’s the problem.
You’ve said before that they deserve it. Shouldn’t have brought their children.
Go chase your tail........
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

again, it’s ok to take some, or
most, but not all?

Makes all kinds of sense.

I’m chasing nothing. I’m leading you around by the nose.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Sea Dangles]

Pete is acting trapped. I have to admit that it makes me smile.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Got Stripers]

The bank robber leaves the bank without money, no crime he can go free, just because you repeat it like the lame arguments his defense put forward, doesn’t make what he did not an impeachable offense.

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by Got Stripers

The bank robber leaves the bank without money, no crime he can go free, just because you repeat it like the lame arguments his defense put forward, doesn’t make what he did not an impeachable offense.

Your silly analogy notwithstanding, Trump did not commit a crime. He did not, as you would have it, bribe anybody. Zelensky denies any attempt to bribe him. There was no victim. Ukraine got the money on time (and more substantial military aid than the previous administration gave Ukraine). That is not a lame argument. it is a fact.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by detbuch

Your silly analogy notwithstanding, Trump did not commit a crime. He did not, as you would have it, bribe anybody. Zelensky denies any attempt to bribe him. There was no victim. Ukraine got the money on time (and more substantial military aid than the previous administration gave Ukraine). That is not a lame argument. it is a fact.

but it’s a fact that doesn’t help liberals. and they can’t process such facts.

Trump is, literally, their North Star. Everything they see and hear is processed through an algorithm that asks the question “how does this make Trump look bad?”. It’s their entire being. WDMSO literally said, there are no facts which make democrats look bad or make republicans look good. Literally, not one single fact. It’s not easy to talk with these people.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

Republican Senator states In An interview he want to read Boltons book transcript

So he can determine if Bolton would be a relevance witness


What an Amazing position to hold

[Got Stripers]

I know crazy to think you would want to hear from a first hand witness, the VERY thing the right has been bitching about since this all started, be careful what you wish for Moscow Mitch.

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

but it’s a fact that doesn’t help liberals. and they can’t process such facts.

Trump is, literally, their North Star. Everything they see and hear is processed through an algorithm that asks the question “how does this make Trump look bad?”. It’s their entire being. WDMSO literally said, there are no facts which make democrats look bad or make republicans look good. Literally, not one single fact. It’s not easy to talk with these people.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Again you cant read. (What Truths hurt Democrats , what truths benefit Trump haven't heard any . Was an response to your statement . here it is , Obviously, you’re only interested in the truth that helps democrats. ) But you read it as a statement of evidence that you twist in your head to have a secret meaning . All Outside the topic of the impeachment and Bolton
You do this a lot bring things from a non related threads and try to make them apply

You dwell in the conservative world of conspiracy and innuendo

[Sea Dangles]

Merry Impeachmas!
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Sea Dangles]

🍔
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by Sea Dangles

🍔
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Sea Dangles]

🍔🤡
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Pete F.]

If the senate comes up one vote short of calling witnesses, the ads against vulnerable senate Rs write themselves.

“It would have taken only one vote to ensure a fair trial. (Candidate) had a chance to show some courage. (He/she) voted for a cover-up instead.”

[Sea Dangles]

👍🏽🍔
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Sea Dangles]

🥳
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device