Put up or Shut Up

[Slipknot]

Originally Posted by Pete F.

The Stable Genius has the former Republican Party following him straight to Jonestown.
Most Trumplicans would tell you the following statements are true.

The traditional American way of life is disappearing so fast that we may have to use force to save it.

A time will come when patriotic Americans have to take the law into their own hands.

Strong leaders sometimes have to bend the rules in order to get things done.

It is hard to trust the results of elections when so many people will vote for anyone who offers a handout.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Wrong again as usual
Most will repeat the phrase the tree of liberty at times needs watering with the blood of tyrants and Patriots. You fall in go guess which category? You support the party who wants to change the constitution and our Republic. sounds like tyranny to me. Your TDS along with others now want to discredit Trump of his accomplishment, well that is an improvement admitting he has accomplishments.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Slipknot

Wrong again as usual
Most will repeat the phrase the tree of liberty at times needs watering with the blood of tyrants and Patriots. You fall in go guess which category? You support the party who wants to change the constitution and our Republic. sounds like tyranny to me. Your TDS along with others now want to discredit Trump of his accomplishment, well that is an improvement admitting he has accomplishments.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Trump called in from the White House to an informal meeting of Pennsylvania lawmakers, repeating baseless claims about the election being "rigged."

"This election has to be turned around," Trump said, though the election results have already been certified in a number of key states, including Pennsylvania, and the formal transition process to the incoming Biden


Is this acceptable in your version of America. A sitting POTUS trying to change an election
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by Slipknot

Wrong again as usual
Most will repeat the phrase the tree of liberty at times needs watering with the blood of tyrants and Patriots. You fall in go guess which category? You support the party who wants to change the constitution and our Republic. sounds like tyranny to me. Your TDS along with others now want to discredit Trump of his accomplishment, well that is an improvement admitting he has accomplishments.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

History will make my point
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[The Dad Fisherman]

Originally Posted by JohnR

Then bring your guns and your army - you're gonna need it.

This is PRECISELY the unhinged verbage that is dividing this country. This is WAY out of line and you do not get to walk this back.

They love to blame Trump for dividing the country, but never take a long look in the mirror at themselves.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by The Dad Fisherman

They love to blame Trump for dividing the country, but never take a long look in the mirror at themselves.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Thanks, you'd never have to buy a drink if I was in the room.

They can never, ever be responsible for any of the division. Only republicans have flaws.

I challenge anyone to find anything Trump has ever said, that's more divisive in a large-scale sense, as Biden saying that Republicans want to put blacks in chains. Trump can be disgustingly obnoxious, and often divisive. but I don't know that you can be much more divisive, that what Biden said.

But Biden gets an absolute free pass. Zero criticism. Zilch.

Have a rich and safe holiday TDF!!

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by JohnR

Then bring your guns and your army - you're gonna need it.

This is PRECISELY the unhinged verbage that is dividing this country. This is WAY out of line and you do not get to walk this back.

Really and you think there’s no horrific problem in the former Republican Party, now the party of Trump
“Anybody who thinks the election went well, like that idiot Krebs who used to be the head of cybersecurity [for Trump]. That guy is a class A moron. He should be drawn and quartered. Taken out at dawn and shot,” diGenova said.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[The Dad Fisherman]

Don't forger Sarcastic too......which I proudly wear as a badge of honor
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

It's going to be a very hard thing to concede because we know there was massive fraud," he said, an allegation he has stood by without offering proof.

All this from a sitting US President in the White House a true un American un Democratic scammer move so he can tell his base what they want to hear, with his hand out fleecing them of their money to pay off his debt .

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

It's going to be a very hard thing to concede because we know there was massive fraud," he said, an allegation he has stood by without offering proof.

All this from a sitting US President in the White House a true un American un Democratic scammer move so he can tell his base what they want to hear, with his hand out fleecing them of their money to pay off his debt .

no proof.

there are vote checkers, whatever they’re called, in PA who say that the republican moderators weren’t allowed in, but the democrats were.

can’t we just look into that, to see if there’s any validity to it? have you concluded they’re lying? if so, how do you know?

i’ll concede i have absolutely no idea if they’re telling the truth. but i’m curious how you seem to know they’re lying.

i know you want them to be
lying. that alone, is t enough to say they are.

it’ll all be over in two
weeks, max.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

no proof.

there are vote checkers, whatever they’re called, in PA who say that the republican moderators weren’t allowed in, but the democrats were.

can’t we just look into that, to see if there’s any validity to it? have you concluded they’re lying? if so, how do you know?

i’ll concede i have absolutely no idea if they’re telling the truth. but i’m curious how you seem to know they’re lying.

i know you want them to be
lying. that alone, is t enough to say they are.

it’ll all be over in two
weeks, max.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Jim stop. This is the new tatic .. of trumpers insit others prove what trump is saying it not True..

Thats not how it works sorry

its so massive Tumps the only one to see it.. ok
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Jim stop. This is the new tatic .. of trumpers insit others prove what trump is saying it not True..

Thats not how it works sorry

its so massive Tumps the only one to see it.. ok
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

someone made an accusation. i say let’s investigate.

thats not how it works? i’m pretty sure that’s exactly how it works.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

someone made an accusation. i say let’s investigate.

thats not how it works? i’m pretty sure that’s exactly how it works.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

No that’s not how it works if you or I thinking something was illegal carries no weight it must be accompanied with evidence

trumps trying invalidate an entire election on claims made on a web page


Not make a claim Then go looking to find the evidence
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Jim stop. This is the new tatic .. of trumpers insit others prove what trump is saying it not True..


Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

sort if like calling for impeachment before trumps first day, insisting he’s a tax cheat, insisting he colluded with russia?

again, that tactic is totally fine when you do it, a flaw when we do it.

you don’t see the double standard there? the russia probe lasted years. years. you have to put up with it for two more weeks. if you can’t take it, turn it off.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

sort if like calling for impeachment before trumps first day, insisting he’s a tax cheat, insisting he colluded with russia?

again, that tactic is totally fine when you do it, a flaw when we do it.

you don’t see the double standard there? the russia probe lasted years. years. you have to put up with it for two more weeks. if you can’t take it, turn it off.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

You keep ignoring Flynn met with the russsian which started the investigation

But once again these 2 ISUUES are not remotely the same ,

But nice to know your willing to Support Trumps attacking our Democratic process .
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Pete F.]

Third Circuit court of appeals rejects appeal of Trump campaign lawsuit in Pennsylvania.
The judge who wrote the Third Circuit’s opinion is a Trump appointee.

The campaign’s appeal was rejected unanimously (3-0) by three GOP-appointed judges.
“Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election ‘unfair’ does not make it so.

Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here.”

You would think his lawyer(s) would know that.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

I believe a "non zero" # were allowed to watch.

[Pete F.]

When a defendant pleads guilty, the gov’t recites the evidence it would use to convict at trial. The judge asks the def, who is under oath, if he’s pleading guilty because he is in fact guilty & for no other reason. Either Flynn was guilty or perjured himself when he said he was.

But Hillary.......
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Got Stripers]

But Obama it’s clinger talk

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Got Stripers

But Obama it’s clinger talk

when you can’t refute what i’m
saying ( and you can’t here), claim it’s invalid to bring it up for some idiotic reason.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Got Stripers]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

when you can’t refute what i’m
saying ( and you can’t here), claim it’s invalid to bring it up for some idiotic reason.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Don’t need to the courts are doing the job for me.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Got Stripers

Don’t need to the courts are doing the job for me.

the courts are making me wrong?

i’d just love for you to point out, where i said that any of trumps fraud claims are accurate.

i said, let him make the claims, let’s investigate, and if none of them prove to be true, he’s a laughingstock.

Is that a partisan statement, GS?

you guys are so far gone, you can’t recognize non-partisan common sense when you see it.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

the courts are making me wrong?

i’d just love for you to point out, where i said that any of trumps fraud claims are accurate.

i said, let him make the claims, let’s investigate, and if none of them prove to be true, he’s a laughingstock.

Is that a partisan statement, GS?

you guys are so far gone, you can’t recognize non-partisan common sense when you see it.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

Jim show me anywhere where you have said any of Trumps election behavior is wrong that’s not a partisan thing

That’s an American value thing.

Hence my dislike for him from day 1 claiming to be a Republican was never on the list
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Got Stripers

Don’t need to the courts are doing the job for me.

Donald Trump: ‘Facts Are on Our Side’ in Election Fight, but ‘Time Isn’t’

He’s thinking the Supreme Court will overturn the election

Heard the best description about their legal strategy,

jumping out of an airplane 1st then they start looking for the parachute on the way down!

I doubt the Supreme Court would even hear the case , but if they did I think it would destroy the court showing that they were Bias to Trump Aka loyalists for entertaining what has already been deemed factually dishonest, and states have certified their elections , and the state’s themselves have seen non of this Fraud the keep insisting exist

let’s see Trump swear to his claims in court as a witness, if he has what he claims to have, he won’t take his current oath seriously
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by wdmso

Donald Trump: ‘Facts Are on Our Side’ in Election Fight, but ‘Time Isn’t’

He’s thinking the Supreme Court will overturn the election

Heard the best description about their legal strategy,

jumping out of an airplane 1st then they start looking for the parachute on the way down!

I doubt the Supreme Court would even hear the case , but if they did I think it would destroy the court showing that they were Bias to Trump Aka loyalists for entertaining what has already been deemed factually dishonest, and states have certified their elections , and the state’s themselves have seen non of this Fraud the keep insisting exist

let’s see Trump swear to his claims in court as a witness, if he has what he claims to have, he won’t take his current oath seriously
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

how do you know he doesn’t have a case?

answer - because you hate him. therefore, in your mind, every single thing he says and does, must be wrong. he can never say or do anything worthwhile.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Pete F.]

Don’t worry the Trumplicans are right on top of things, they even have their own followers confused

An exasperated voter in Marietta asks RNC Chair Ronna McDaniel, “Why should we trust this election when it’s already been decided?” McDaniel says, “It hasn’t been decided!” Another voter shouts out that Republican Governor Brian Kemp is corrupt.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device