| |
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
| Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
11-23-2011, 10:00 AM
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
"as usual, it's OK for the lib to descend to the gutter but don't you dare point it out, mock or criticize or you are the bad guy....neat trick"-
No, I think anyone who refers to woman as "half beast" has a problem w/woman in general and is a scum bag whether they are lib or cons.
So show me where any "lib" here has called woman such demeaning names as Jim.
|
The liberals were SO respectful of Sarah Palin in 2008. Barack Obama on Sarah Palin..."you can put lipstick on a pig, but it's still a pig". Look at the photos that MSNBC uses of Bachman or Palin, please.
The "libs here" support the slaughter of 4,000 unborn babies a day. Let's assume half of those are women. Who cares more for them?
Paul, I can go on all day. How much time do you have? |
|
|
|
|
|
11-23-2011, 10:46 AM
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,306
|
RIJ - I agree 100% w/you. Totally wrong.
My point is there are people on both sides who think nothing of insulting the other side. For the most part, it doesn't happen here. Jim seems to think it is appropriate.
Congress will continue to have 9% approval ratings until things change.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11-23-2011, 11:06 AM
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
RIJ - I agree 100% w/you. Totally wrong.
My point is there are people on both sides who think nothing of insulting the other side. For the most part, it doesn't happen here. Jim seems to think it is appropriate.
Congress will continue to have 9% approval ratings until things change.
|
Paul, you called me a "scum bag", and 5 minutes later, you're saying that I'm the only one who thinks it's OK to insult people.
Paul, please get off your high horse. Maddow's actions provoked me into insulting her, and my actions provoked you into insulting me. From where I sit, you and I are both equally guilty of insulting those with whom we disagree, so I fail to see from where you assume the moral high ground on this issue.
Good luck responding to that.
Unbelievable. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11-23-2011, 02:58 PM
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,306
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
Paul, you called me a "scum bag", and 5 minutes later, you're saying that I'm the only one who thinks it's OK to insult people.
Paul, please get off your high horse. Maddow's actions provoked me into insulting her, and my actions provoked you into insulting me. From where I sit, you and I are both equally guilty of insulting those with whom we disagree, so I fail to see from where you assume the moral high ground on this issue.
Good luck responding to that.
Unbelievable.
|
No, I have no problem insulting you at all. Your constantly insulting ALL people who don't agree w/you. That is the difference. I would have thought you got that. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11-23-2011, 03:34 PM
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 12,632
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
No, I have no problem insulting you at all. Your constantly insulting ALL people who don't agree w/you. That is the difference. I would have thought you got that.
|
like I said...neat trick  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11-23-2011, 03:43 PM
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
No, I have no problem insulting you at all. Your constantly insulting ALL people who don't agree w/you. That is the difference. I would have thought you got that.
|
Wrong. First of all, I don't insult all people who disagree with me. In the case of Maddow, it's irrefutable fact that she likes to call people like me "tea bagging racists", which is obviously meant to be derogatory.
And second of all, you said that insulting was inappropriate. I wonder when you got appointed the God of deciding who it's appropriate to insult, and who it's not appropriate to insult. But liberals often anoint themselves with such authority, in order to defend an obvious hypocrisy. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11-23-2011, 12:44 PM
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Mansfield, MA
Posts: 5,238
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
The "libs here" support the slaughter of 4,000 unborn babies a day. Let's assume half of those are women. Who cares more for them?
|
 As always, a pathetic attempt to spin a topic that doesn't have even a remote relationship to abortion into "killing unborn babies."
You're really committed to mentioning that "Liberal = Baby Killer" any time a non-Conservative politician is mentioned. We get the point. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11-23-2011, 02:06 PM
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,481
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyD
You're really committed to mentioning that "Liberal = Baby Killer" any time a non-Conservative politician is mentioned. We get the point.
|
Didn't his hero Newt lie about 800 babies being left in dumpsters in DC?
Birds of a feather...
-spence |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11-23-2011, 03:40 PM
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyD
As always, a pathetic attempt to spin a topic that doesn't have even a remote relationship to abortion into "killing unborn babies."
You're really committed to mentioning that "Liberal = Baby Killer" any time a non-Conservative politician is mentioned. We get the point. |
Johnny, if a liberal accuses me of not caring about women, then I think it's pretty valid to point out that I am opposed to the slaughter of 2000 unborn girls a day, and to point out that most liberals support that.
If the shoe fits Johnny, if the shoe fits... |
|
|
|
|
|
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
 Hybrid Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:04 AM.
|
| |
