Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Is it? Please define "arms" then. Slingshot? RPG?
I'd think we could all agree that an individual doesn't need a nuclear weapon to protect themselves from assault or government abuse.
|
Yes, it is. While the scope of this Right is widely disputed (such as the assault rifle debates), it is my belief that the Second Amendment grants citizens the right to own a firearm for personal protection and any overly intrusive regulations on that right, such as a handgun ban, is Unconstitutional.
As you said, Constitutional intent. In this case, the intent is clear.
Threaded Mode