| |
 |
|
 |
| |
| Sports Talk - Title Town Sports Talk - Our Home for the 2004/2007 World Champion Red Sox, Super Bowl XXXVI, XXXVIII, XXXIX Champion Patriots! SEVENTEEN TIME NBA Champion Boston Celtics, 2011 winners of Lord Stanley's Cup Boston Bruins!!! |
 |
02-13-2008, 12:20 PM
|
#1
|
|
Trophy Hunter Apprentice
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: THE Other Cape
Posts: 2,508
|
Burton should be recused and his testimony stricken as
highly volatile and infantile. He, McNamee, lied to the press!!
He told the truth, under oath.
Roger lied to both parties.
|
"The first condition of happiness is that the connection
between man and nature shall not be broken."~~ Leo Tolstoy
Tight Lines, and
Happy Hunting to ALL!
|
|
|
02-13-2008, 12:32 PM
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: South of Boston
Posts: 2,605
|
Just another opportunity for blowhard politicians to look for the cameras and rush to grandstand.
This is a disgrace. No wonder nothing of substance gets done in the House and Senate. They all can't wait to get back to their office to look at the autographs Clemmens gave them.
|
The charm of fishing is that it is the pursuit of what is elusive but attainable, a perpetual series of occasions for hope. ~John Buchan
|
|
|
02-13-2008, 12:34 PM
|
#3
|
|
Old Guy
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Mansfield, MA
Posts: 8,760
|
So you thing Roger is lying a Texan bandito
|
|
|
|
|
02-13-2008, 12:46 PM
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: On my boat
Posts: 9,703
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-13-2008, 12:55 PM
|
#5
|
|
Trophy Hunter Apprentice
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: THE Other Cape
Posts: 2,508
|
LOVE that Nanny!!!!
Give it up, Rocket..........
You lying sack of SHEEEEET!
Also, who is this Cossack piece of work and which rock did ESPN pull him out from under?
Are you kidding me with Burton's feeble ambiguous attempt to doubt McNamee's credibility. How about the coroboration aspect of the Nanny? How about the way in which he DID protect all three players by lying to the Press? What, was McNamee supposed to lie to Mitchell and Congess as well?
Cossack is a Roger stooge  .
Where is the objectivity? No such thing in press anymore!
From my view, The Rocket looks like the liar and McNamee looks very credible.
Roger's gonna get soome time for perjury before he's done!
Last edited by BassDawg; 02-13-2008 at 01:19 PM..
|
"The first condition of happiness is that the connection
between man and nature shall not be broken."~~ Leo Tolstoy
Tight Lines, and
Happy Hunting to ALL!
|
|
|
02-13-2008, 12:59 PM
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: On my boat
Posts: 9,703
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BassDawg
LOVE that Nanny!!!!
Give it up, Rocket1
You lying sack of SHEEEEET!
|
Possible tampering with a witness (the nanny) charge coming for Roger!
|
|
|
|
|
02-13-2008, 01:16 PM
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,501
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by striperman36
So you thing Roger is lying a Texan bandito
|
Based on what I've heard so far, I don't believe either of them.
-spence
|
|
|
|
|
02-13-2008, 01:39 PM
|
#8
|
|
Trophy Hunter Apprentice
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: THE Other Cape
Posts: 2,508
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by spence
Based on what I've heard so far, I don't believe either of them.
-spence
|
Can't be much more on the fence than that, spence.
One or the other of them is LYING.
McNamee has the Pettitte(s), Knoblauch, Mitchell, viles and swabs, Debbie Clemens, and the Nanny to support his statements and his involvement with HGH and steroids.
Clemens has himself, and Canseco about one thing ~a stinkin' BBQ. And Roger has changed his testimony on that remotely related incident within THESE very proceedings. Before the break he said that he was never there. After the break and the Nanny's testimony via deposition, he said that he may have stopped by to drop of his foursome, his wife, his kids, his nanny?? Which one is it, LIAR??
Last edited by BassDawg; 02-24-2008 at 08:36 AM..
|
"The first condition of happiness is that the connection
between man and nature shall not be broken."~~ Leo Tolstoy
Tight Lines, and
Happy Hunting to ALL!
|
|
|
02-13-2008, 01:46 PM
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: RI
Posts: 21,501
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BassDawg
Can't be much mopre on the fence than that, spence.
|
Just because one is lying doesn't mean that the other isn't as well.
-spence
Last edited by spence; 02-13-2008 at 02:05 PM..
|
|
|
|
|
02-13-2008, 02:02 PM
|
#10
|
|
BigFish Bait Co.
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hanover
Posts: 23,392
|
What a ridiculous dog and pony show!!! One of the Senators was questioning McNamee and he was asking him questions that were in regards to someone else (I can't recall his name)......these idiots do not even know who they are talking to or about!!!! What a huge joke! 
|
Almost time to get our fish on!!!
|
|
|
02-13-2008, 02:27 PM
|
#11
|
|
Captain Pete
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: CT
Posts: 936
|
[Clemens has himself, and Canseco about one thing a stinkin' BBQ. And Roger has changed his testimony on that one within THESE very proceedings. Before the break he said that he was never there.
After the break, he said that he may have stopped by to drop of his wife, his kids, his nanny?? Which one is it, LIAR??[/QUOTE]
There's so much said about the BBQ. Other than credability, why is the BBQ so important?
|
|
|
|
|
02-13-2008, 03:11 PM
|
#12
|
|
Trophy Hunter Apprentice
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: THE Other Cape
Posts: 2,508
|
Exactly!
The boobs for Roger used it to call into question McNamee's credibility.
The funny thing is that all the posturing by those stooges backfired when the Nanny's deposition validates McNamee's statements.
Did anyone else see Roger going cotton-mouth up there, his eyes going from side to side searching for more lies, and the evasiveness of his responses when asked a direct question? If i heard about his triplecrown, his Cy's, and his pooooor Momma one more time, i think that i would've puked!!!
Also, did anyone else see Senator Davis go into the back room with Roger afterwards?
Congrats to Senator Waxman for conducting and chairing on the side of reason and fairplay ~despite some of his colleagues attempts to glad-hand and cow-tow to the MLB Icon, displicable to say the least!
Last edited by BassDawg; 02-14-2008 at 12:45 PM..
|
"The first condition of happiness is that the connection
between man and nature shall not be broken."~~ Leo Tolstoy
Tight Lines, and
Happy Hunting to ALL!
|
|
|
02-13-2008, 03:19 PM
|
#13
|
|
Jiggin' Leper Lawyer
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: 61° 30′ 0″ N, 23° 46′ 0″ E
Posts: 8,164
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pmueller
[Clemens has himself, and Canseco about one thing a stinkin' BBQ. And Roger has changed his testimony on that one within THESE very proceedings. Before the break he said that he was never there.
After the break, he said that he may have stopped by to drop of his wife, his kids, his nanny?? Which one is it, LIAR??
|
There's so much said about the BBQ. Other than credability, why is the BBQ so important?[/QUOTE]
It's not. In a court of law it would be called a "collateral issue", one that isn't even pertinent to the case. If Clemens was found to have lied about being there, he couldn't even be prosecuted for perjury because the lie is not about a "material fact"
When I turned the radio on to drive to the Fall River courthouse, the first question I heard was, "Mr. Clemens do you suffer from anemia" as one guy grilled him about all of the legitimate medical uses for B-12  That one guy really got in his face about his ridiculous "it was B-12 and my momma told me it was good for me" 
|
Wise men speak because they have something to say; Fools, because they have to say something.
|
|
|
02-13-2008, 04:43 PM
|
#14
|
|
Captain Pete
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: CT
Posts: 936
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike P
There's so much said about the BBQ. Other than credability, why is the BBQ so important?
|
It's not. In a court of law it would be called a "collateral issue", one that isn't even pertinent to the case. If Clemens was found to have lied about being there, he couldn't even be prosecuted for perjury because the lie is not about a "material fact"
When I turned the radio on to drive to the Fall River courthouse, the first question I heard was, "Mr. Clemens do you suffer from anemia" as one guy grilled him about all of the legitimate medical uses for B-12  That one guy really got in his face about his ridiculous "it was B-12 and my momma told me it was good for me"  [/QUOTE]
Thats what I thought. Pretty much saw the whole thing today. Working later today.
I think his lawyers have alot more work to do. Clemens really lost today.
|
|
|
|
|
02-13-2008, 03:28 PM
|
#15
|
|
Super Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Georgetown MA
Posts: 18,225
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by pmueller
There's so much said about the BBQ. Other than credability, why is the BBQ so important?
|
Clemens is starting to lay the Groundwork for the "Smoking Rib" Defense.
We all know that beef is loaded with Growth Hormones so if he can establish that he stuffed his Pie-Hole at the BBQ with an un-godly amount of Ribs and Burgers it would explain the HGH in his system.
He will also try and use this in conjuntion with the "Slick Willy at the Drive-Thru" Defense and claim that he did Chew but never Swallowed
|
"If you're arguing with an idiot, make sure he isn't doing the same thing."
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Hybrid Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:31 PM.
|
| |