| |
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
| |
| The Scuppers This is a new forum for the not necessarily fishing related topics... |
 |
09-01-2005, 08:06 PM
|
#1
|
|
Which Way Did They Go
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Blackstone, MA
Posts: 1,147
|
Right on Tinman...right on...
And I agree, nano technologies might hold the key to many issues -- including our energy crisis.
|
"You make a living by what you get. You make a life by what you give"
|
|
|
09-01-2005, 08:13 PM
|
#2
|
|
........
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 22,805
|
one other point
"Solar even at 100% efficiency is not going to do it. It might help charge a battery but it is not reliable and has such a low energy density it will be impossible to power much of anything."
one thing about solar power is loss of electricity in the conversion process...
but with carbon nano tube technology there is almost zero loss and the material is perfect for electrical transmission which is why i remain hopeful.
|
|
|
|
|
09-01-2005, 09:39 PM
|
#3
|
|
Dave's Guide Service
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Cape Cod
Posts: 7,557
|
%$%$%$%$ these %$%$%$%$ing gas prices
|
Pro Tool Club....
|
|
|
09-02-2005, 11:11 AM
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: its an easy guess
Posts: 197
|
Prices must be brutal on the Cape, most here were at 2.99 last night when I came home tho one station still had gas at 2.87. Im hearing that it will be at least 3.20 by sunday in this area.
|
|
|
|
|
09-02-2005, 11:29 AM
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Maine
Posts: 4,547
|
I was at the pumps at Cumby's getting gas when the attendant came out with a 4 in his hand. (Gas was $3.11 when I was filling up) I asked him if it was going up to $3.14, he said no...$3.41 
|
|
|
|
|
09-02-2005, 11:38 AM
|
#6
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,945
|
got to look around, if ya can, saw it as "low" as $2.99, and as high as $3.55, both for regular, this AM, in Orleans/Eastham area
|
|
|
|
|
09-02-2005, 11:44 AM
|
#7
|
|
Also known as OAK
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Westlery, RI
Posts: 10,422
|
10 years ago I had a 1974 land rover; got 12miles/gallon, had a 12gallon tank; cost me 12 bucks to fill it (1.09 was alot)
I'm no economist; but I dont think the 'stringent' environmental laws have increased the production cose by 3X; yet cost has gone up to 3X its price 10 years ago....
While I dont just blame this administration, this blows; it is crippling anyone making minimal wage or there abouts; especially outside of RI where people actually DRIVE some distance to a job...
|
Bryan
Originally Posted by #^^^^^^^^^^^&
"For once I agree with Spence. UGH. I just hope I don't get the urge to go start buying armani suits to wear in my shop"
|
|
|
 |
| Thread Tools |
|
|
| Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Hybrid Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:13 AM.
|
| |