|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
01-31-2022, 11:04 AM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
I'm sure you said the same thing when Reagan said he would pick a woman.
|
i was a tad young so no, not at the time.
whet do you think my response will be to reagan and teump doing it?
(1) it’s just as stupid as biden doing it?
or
(2) it’s ok when republicans do it?
the answer, obviously, is (1). i’m not a naked hypocrite paul. that’s you guys, not me.
i think it was brilliant, politically, for trump to pick a woman because it put the democrats in an impossible situation.
Barrett was also clearly brilliant and qualified, and Trump knew that ( knew her) when he said he’s luck a woman. we all knew, for many reasons, it was going to be Barrett.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
01-31-2022, 11:07 AM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,432
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
i was a tad young so no, not at the time.
whet do you think my response will be to reagan and teump doing it?
(1) it’s just as stupid as biden doing it?
or
(2) it’s ok when republicans do it?
the answer, obviously, is (1). i’m not a naked hypocrite paul. that’s you guys, not me.
i think it was brilliant, politically, for trump to pick a woman because it put the democrats in an impossible situation.
Barrett was also clearly brilliant and qualified, and Trump knew that ( knew her) when he said he’s luck a woman. we all knew, for many reasons, it was going to be Barrett.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Barrett was also clearly brilliant
Really please tell
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
01-31-2022, 11:30 AM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
Barrett was also clearly brilliant
Really please tell
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
got through days of questioning, often without having to take notes. Dianne Feinstein, who single handedly led the with hunt against Kavanaugh, was repeatedly impressed by her.
Got a full scholarship to Notre Dame law and taught there. Has taught at ND and at University of Virginia, which is a great school.
Character? She adopted two children from Haiti, and is raising a kid with Downs, we all know what your side does to those kids.
Unlike Sotomayor, Barrett doesn't have a history of getting unanimously overturned by higher courts, nor has Barrettt ever said that judges of her race and gender make better judges (which is what Sotomayor once claimed).
|
|
|
|
01-31-2022, 01:59 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,432
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
got through days of questioning, often without having to take notes. WOW so that qualifies you to be a SCJ Dianne Feinstein, who single handedly led the with hunt against Kavanaugh, was repeatedly impressed by her.
Got a full scholarship to Notre Dame law and taught there. Has taught at ND and at University of Virginia, which is a great school. Sotomayor entered Princeton University on a full scholarship do you have a point
Character? She adopted two children from Haiti, and is raising a kid with Downs, we all know what your side does to those kids. has nothing to do with her qualifications
Unlike Sotomayor, Barrett doesn't have a history of getting unanimously overturned by higher courts, nor has Barrettt ever said that judges of her race and gender make better judges (which is what Sotomayor once claimed). jim again do you do any research or are just a parrot Over her ten years on the Second Circuit, Sotomayor heard appeals in more than 3,000 cases and wrote about 380 opinions when she was in the majority.[13] The Supreme Court reviewed five of those, reversing three and affirming two[13]—not high numbers for an appellate judge of that many years[18] and a typical percentage of reversals.[113]
|
2 years On the Seventh Circuit, Barrett wrote 79 majority opinions
Barrett is a 48-year-old federal appeals court judge favored by social conservatives and the religious right.
But Jim wants us to think Trump picked her because she was the best for the Job 
|
|
|
|
01-31-2022, 02:58 PM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
2 years On the Seventh Circuit, Barrett wrote 79 majority opinions
Barrett is a 48-year-old federal appeals court judge favored by social conservatives and the religious right.
But Jim wants us to think Trump picked her because she was the best for the Job 
|
How many of Barrett's 79 majority opinions, were overturned by a higher court? That's a sincere question...
Sotomayor has repeatedly been overturned by the Supreme Court, when she was a lower justice. Once, she was overturned unanimously. That means everyone from Scalia to Ginsburg, and everyone in between, said she was wrong on the law. Which kind of means she wasn't great at being a lower court judge, doesn't it?.
Sotomayor also said that female hispanics make better judges than anyone else. That's what she said.
Oh, there were sleazy reasons why Trump picked Barrett. He knew a woman would drive the liberals bonkers and when they attacked her, it would show the world that they don't really care about women like they claim they do.
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Hybrid Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:53 PM.
|
| |