Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
pete, tell me which part of this you don’t understand…
i believe that for a job that important, you go with THE most qualified candidate. regardless of skin color or presence of a wee wee.
i’m sure there are black women who’d do fine. but if there’s a white man who’d do better, i want him.
if the best candidate is a native american, non binary, non cis, asexual or pan sexual, pick he/she/they/them.
but i see zero value in passing over the best candidate, for the sake of appearances
you disagree. fine. but don’t claim
my view is racist. i’m ignoring race, you’re the one denying opportunity for race. that’s the definition of racism.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
If that’s your argument make the case for Kavanaugh and Barrett being the “most” qualified people.
All of the rumored black women have far more impressive qualifications than either of those.
But they’re not white as all but two of the Justices have been to date.
Biden announced he'd nominate a Black woman to SCOTUS and the white wing is losing their #^&#^&#^&#^&. For centuries there was no announcement that the nominee would be a white man b/c it was assumed. That's how racial ideology works; it passes as uncontroversial & natural landscape.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Threaded Mode