Tara Reade working with Ronan Farrow

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

I told you numerous times I use the word spasm and retard to make fun of you trumplicans who had no problem with Trump up there mimicking a person with a disability. Did you not understand that the first three times I told you? Didn't you also say that you couldn't read the ad
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

even though by your own admission, trump
never said it, nor is there any evidence he ever made fun of such a person. there is irrefutable evidence obama has made fun of them, but you don’t care.

so you use a hateful term, to blame trump for doing something he’s never done, but which obama has done.

brilliant. simply brilliant. where’d they find you, Scotland Yard?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

even though by your own admission, trump
never said it, nor is there any evidence he ever made fun of such a person. there is irrefutable evidence obama has made fun of them, but you don’t care.

so you use a hateful term, to blame trump for doing something he’s never done, but which obama has done.

brilliant. simply brilliant. where’d they find you, Scotland Yard?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

He most certainly made fun of the reporter if you want to deny it feel free to. It just shows what a deranged person you are. Any reasonable person knows that's exactly what he was doing. Why don't you just go back and read the post and that other thread and instead of regurgitating all the garbage you said previously.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

He most certainly made fun of the reporter if you want to deny it feel free to. It just shows what a deranged person you are. Any reasonable person knows that's exactly what he was doing. Why don't you just go back and reread that other thread and instead of regurgitating all the garbage you said previously.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

and that reporter didn’t have Downs. so why the word “retard”?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

and that reporter didn’t have Downs. so why the word “retard”?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

I don't know what he had so I care less. I know he had a disability. If that makes you feel better that he didn't have Downs knock yourself out. But the bottom line is he was mocking someone with a disability he knew the person had a disability yet did it. And that is the classy guy that you are on here defending day in and day out repeatedly. I guess that's a reflection of you
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[detbuch]

Originally Posted by PaulS

I don't know what he had so I care less. I know he had a disability. If that makes you feel better that he didn't have Downs knock yourself out. But the bottom line is he was mocking someone with a disability he knew the person had a disability yet did it. And that is the classy guy that you are on here defending day in and day out repeatedly. I guess that's a reflection of you
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

He wasn't mocking the reporter's disability. He was mocking the reporter for, what he considered, backtracking on what he had earlier said.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

I don't know what he had so I care less. I know he had a disability. If that makes you feel better that he didn't have Downs knock yourself out. But the bottom line is he was mocking someone with a disability he knew the person had a disability yet did it. And that is the classy guy that you are on here defending day in and day out repeatedly. I guess that's a reflection of you
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

if you don’t know what he had, why use the word “retard”? do you feel everyone who isn’t perfect, is a “retard”?

this gets better and better. man oh man.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

if you don’t know what he had, why use the word “retard”? do you feel everyone who isn’t perfect, is a “retard”?

this gets better and better. man oh man.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

man oh man this gets better and better. Did you not read post 60? Somehow you didn't read it but you quoted it. Edit so post 60 was the fourth time I've told you the same thing and still for some reason it doesn't register.

And I have no problem with anyone who's not perfect. But let's remember that the Republicans are constantly talking about makers and takers so you have to assume that if someone is not perfect they probably don't contribute as much as the makers in this world and the Republicans consider them "takers" and therefore look down on them.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by PaulS

man oh man this gets better and better. Did you not read post 60? Somehow you didn't read it but you quoted it. Edit so post 60 was the fourth time I've told you the same thing and still for some reason it doesn't register.

And I have no problem with anyone who's not perfect. But let's remember that the Republicans are constantly talking about makers and takers so you have to assume that if someone is not perfect they probably don't contribute as much as the makers in this world and the Republicans consider them "takers" and therefore look down on them.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

and yet, conservatives donate
more time to charity than liberals.

republicans look down on them...

how many times have you called
me out for making generalizations?

and we don’t look down on people
who need help. we look down on people who could be self sufficient but choose to be takers.

you’re having a rough couple of days.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[PaulS]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

and yet, conservatives donate
more time to charity than liberals.

republicans look down on them...

how many times have you called
me out for making generalizations?

and we don’t look down on people
who need help. we look down on people who could be self sufficient but choose to be takers.

you’re having a rough couple of days.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

You change your argument from more money to time. But it's the same answer they donate the time to churches. So when my church wanted to make a small Chapel out of what was the garage and I helped demo it that would go towards donating time to a charity which in effect nobody else is going to use other than the parishioners.

I've heard it numerous times about makers and takers here and elsewhere but you're right it was a generalization I shouldn't have made. It doesn't change the fact that they look down on people who don't contribute as much as others.

I'm not having a rough time bc I think it's hilarious how you're so deranged that you spend day after day, night after night, week day, weekends defending Donald Trump. No matter how incompetent he is, no matter what he does, how stupid his statements. you will defend him
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device