|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
05-06-2020, 06:25 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,306
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
Paul, for god's sake, you denied your own logic in this thread. You claimed your logic, was my logic. Look at this post of yours. Seriously?
|
Am I supposed to follow that
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
05-06-2020, 06:32 PM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
Am I supposed to follow that
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Yes, you were.
On this thread, you said that hate speech is acceptable if used in a self-deprecating way. Then when I used an example, you claimed that was my logic, not yours.
That was before you said it would be no bog deal if someone died.
It's a good thing you're not angry.
You're coming completely un-glued. And i'm not saying that because we usually disagree, I'm not saying it to get you riled up. Read your posts on this thread. You like to go on and on about lecturing me about how you were raised better than me, that I have no class, etc. While those two things may both be true, you wouldn't know it from reading your posts here.
|
|
|
|
05-06-2020, 06:46 PM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,306
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
Yes, you were.
On this thread, you said that hate speech is acceptable if used in a self-deprecating way. Then when I used an example, you claimed that was my logic, not yours.
That was before you said it would be no bog deal if someone died.
It's a good thing you're not angry.
You're coming completely un-glued. And i'm not saying that because we usually disagree, I'm not saying it to get you riled up. Read your posts on this thread. You like to go on and on about lecturing me about how you were raised better than me, that I have no class, etc. While those two things may both be true, you wouldn't know it from reading your posts here.
|
So I'm supposed to take his vile scummy lies? He hasn't added a single thing since he started posting here. Just as with you I've never insulted him first. And I'm a little concerned with him he has a Rollie Pollie body type with a fat stomach so he has an worst chance of long term survival. His BMI is probably over 30 so he hss a good chance being diabetic. So I'll ask why should I take his insult?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
05-06-2020, 06:50 PM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
So I'm supposed to take his vile scummy lies? He hasn't added a single thing since he started posting here. Just as with you I've never insulted him first. And I'm a little concerned with him he has a Rollie Pollie body type with a fat stomach so he has an worst chance of long term survival. His BMI is probably over 30 so he hss a good chance being diabetic. So I'll ask why should I take his insult?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
I didn't say you're supposed to take it. I notice liberals have a pattern (sorry, for your benefit, let me say not every single liberal, but many) of responding to something that has never been said. When you can't respond to what has been said, it's a lot easier to react as if I said something stupid, something that I never came close to saying.
I didn't say just take it. I've told him to tone it down. But there are other options besides just taking it, or saying his death will be no big deal. There is actually a lot of room between those options, so I'm not sure why you'd act as if those are the only two choices.
It's also funny that when I responded to Pete, you chastised me for it. But you can respond to SD.
|
|
|
|
05-06-2020, 06:54 PM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,306
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
I didn't say you're supposed to take it. I notice liberals have a pattern (sorry, for your benefit, let me say not every single liberal, but many) of responding to something that has never been said. When you can't respond to what has been said, it's a lot easier to react as if I said something stupid, something that I never came close to saying.
I didn't say just take it. I've told him to tone it down. But there are other options besides just taking it, or saying his death will be no big deal. There is actually a lot of room between those options, so I'm not sure why you'd act as if those are the only two choices.
It's also funny that when I responded to Pete, you chastised me for it. But you can respond to SD.
|
You bring it on yourself by constantly insulting people first. So what do you find redeeming about Rollie? Don't forget this is the scummy guy who said certain people didn't make any sacrifice ( or something similar) for the pandemic but when asked what he did he can't answer.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Last edited by PaulS; 05-06-2020 at 07:02 PM..
|
|
|
|
05-06-2020, 07:24 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20,441
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
You bring it on yourself by constantly insulting people first. So what do you find redeeming about Rollie? Don't forget this is the scummy guy who said certain people didn't make any sacrifice ( or something similar) for the pandemic but when asked what he did he can't answer.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
"bring it on yourself by constantly insulting people first.'
Try to follow here...so when you used the word "retard" here for no possibly conceivable reason...was that not you insulting first? Or did the "retards" do something to you, that you were responding to?
Get off your high horse. Every time you lob insults, you say it's justified. When any conservative does it, it's never justified, it's always a character flaw. Always OK when you do it, always wrong when a conservative does it.
|
|
|
|
05-06-2020, 07:33 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 10,306
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim in CT
"bring it on yourself by constantly insulting people first.'
Try to follow here...so when you used the word "retard" here for no possibly conceivable reason...was that not you insulting first? Or did the "retards" do something to you, that you were responding to?
Get off your high horse. Every time you lob insults, you say it's justified. When any conservative does it, it's never justified, it's always a character flaw. Always OK when you do it, always wrong when a conservative does it.
|
As I told you, I used spazz and retard because watching Trump mock the reporter that's what a reasonable person would think. And I did it to mock Trump and the conservatives who have no problem with his doing that. I've never once said that when a conservative does lobs an insult that it's never Justified. However if you look at the conservatives on this site they're constantly insulting liberals first whether it's you, Scott with his snarky posts or Rollie.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Hybrid Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:39 AM.
|
| |