Quote:
Originally Posted by PaulS
You lied again. You are a compulsive liar.
|
You made up a laughably absurd excuse (insider trading doesn't warrant scrutiny if only one security was traded) that no one, ever, has used. You came up with that idiotic excuse to defend the democrat. Not only did I not lie, you proved my point.
You aid the degree to which insider trading is unethical, depends on the number of securities involved, rather than the amount of money involved, or the nature of the insider information upon which the decision to sell was made. If you actually believe that, you're an idiot. If you don't believe it but invented that excuse to defend the democrats, youre a liar.
you conceded that the democrat is getting less scrutiny. She sole over $1 million of stock based on information she gathered doing the job we entrusted her to do, information not available to the public, But you say because only 1 stock was involved, that's a valid reason for the decreased scrutiny.
An idiot or a liar. There isn't a third excuse for saying that.
Threaded Mode