|
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
Political Threads This section is for Political Threads - Enter at your own risk. If you say you don't want to see what someone posts - don't read it :hihi: |
12-17-2018, 02:03 PM
|
#1
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 8,718
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
when your argument is .. I have agenda to uphold what's yours insults and drive by's ?
I said it was not special .. it did give closure for those family's
unlike you I judge him on the totality of his actions not the one time he did something positive..
"To think that you put this on the same table as negotiating with terrorists says a lot about your intellectual integrity."
Seem you forgot who Trump went to visit in North korea and negotiated with to have those remains returned and you what does that say about your your intellectual integrity."
funny I saw it as POTUS duty to get thoses men home .. you see it ok for Trump to deal with Kim but Not Obama with the taliban to get an american home ... ???
U.S. Officials Meet With Taliban Again as Trump Pushes Afghan Peace Process OMG say it ain't so!!! Trump negotiates with terrorist
|
When you said you would be on the lookout for his positive actions I thought pointing out a positive action might be a good reminder. Instead of conceding this was a positive action you decided to say it was his duty. If Obama had done this the left would have given him the Nobel peace prize. Can it not be both his duty as well as a positive action given the fact it had been close to 50 years and none of his predecessors had fulfilled their “duty”?
The fact you characterize a deserter in the same breath as those who made the ultimate sacrifice says a mouthful about your personal integrity. Truly disgraceful.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Last edited by Sea Dangles; 12-17-2018 at 02:09 PM..
|
PRO CHOICE REPUBLICAN
|
|
|
12-17-2018, 04:23 PM
|
#2
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,434
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sea Dangles
The fact you characterize a deserter in the same breath as those who made the ultimate sacrifice says a mouthful about your personal integrity. Truly disgraceful.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Unlike you I don't pick and choose which Americans DESERVE TO COME HOME over others . What's it like to ride on such a high horse and to be so arrogant willing to Leave any American in the hands of an enemy . For 1 min no less 5 years
Some leader you would have made if you were ever in the service .. willing to leaving men behind and you speak of personal integrity. As if you know what it means
Ps
The U.S. Army has prosecuted about 1,900 cases of desertion since 2001, despite tens of thousands of soldiers fleeing the service in the face of deadly combat, long and multiple deployments in Iraq and Afghanistan
|
|
|
|
12-17-2018, 05:50 PM
|
#3
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 8,718
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
Unlike you I don't pick and choose which Americans DESERVE TO COME HOME over others . What's it like to ride on such a high horse and to be so arrogant willing to Leave any American in the hands of an enemy . For 1 min no less 5 years
Some leader you would have made if you were ever in the service .. willing to leaving men behind and you speak of personal integrity. As if you know what it means
Ps
The U.S. Army has prosecuted about 1,900 cases of desertion since 2001, despite tens of thousands of soldiers fleeing the service in the face of deadly combat, long and multiple deployments in Iraq and Afghanistan
|
To compare the two is laughable. But nice try in your effort to once again change the narrative of the discussion to one you feign outrage over. Your head must be spinning as usual. We didn’t just bring him back as you know. I also don’t remember saying or even implying that we leave him. Where do you come up with this? Get back to our discussion and stop looking for bushes to hide in.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
PRO CHOICE REPUBLICAN
|
|
|
12-18-2018, 10:36 AM
|
#4
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,434
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sea Dangles
To compare the two is laughable. But nice try in your effort to once again change the narrative of the discussion to one you feign outrage over. Your head must be spinning as usual. We didn’t just bring him back as you know. I also don’t remember saying or even implying that we leave him. Where do you come up with this? Get back to our discussion and stop looking for bushes to hide in.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
And I never compared him to the fallen .. you clearly. Have “ to compare the two is laughable “ so let’s get back discussions You brought the Korean remains into the conversation and bergdahl not I
So as I said it it the duty of any sitting potus to do whatever he can do to bring home any Americans home regardless if they died In combat or not .. it’s not debatable
All service members their families and the nation must have no doubts and have confidence that USA will do what’s required to bring every one home..
once home if actions of individuals were unlawful in the eyes of the UCMJ that’s when it gets resolved.
The perception of UCMJ violations should not delay attempts at repatriation ..
Clearly you feel it was wrong of Obama to make the deal for berghdal
But no issues with Trump dealing with Kim to have those remains returned
You made the comparison sacrifice good deal / deserter bad deal
It’s very clear
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
12-18-2018, 10:57 AM
|
#5
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 8,718
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
And I never compared him to the fallen .. you clearly. Have “ to compare the two is laughable “ so let’s get back discussions You brought the Korean remains into the conversation and bergdahl not I
So as I said it it the duty of any sitting potus to do whatever he can do to bring home any Americans home regardless if they died In combat or not .. it’s not debatable
All service members their families and the nation must have no doubts and have confidence that USA will do what’s required to bring every one home..
once home if actions of individuals were unlawful in the eyes of the UCMJ that’s when it gets resolved.
The perception of UCMJ violations should not delay attempts at repatriation ..
Clearly you feel it was wrong of Obama to make the deal for berghdal
But no issues with Trump dealing with Kim to have those remains returned
You made the comparison sacrifice good deal / deserter bad deal
It’s very clear
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
This is a discussion where you said you were waiting for a positive action from Trump. I provided the example of bringing home our fallen servicemen ,which took many years as well as many administrations to accomplish. You trivialized it.....wonder why
Wrong party is my guess.
You proceeded by smearing the accomplishment by bringing NK into the discussion despite insisting it is our duty to bring home all of our men regardless. A dizzying display of partisanship. Yes we are obligated to bring them all back. Yes it was a bad deal to bring back this deserter,we lost 6 good men bringing back a soldier who turned his back on his comrades,such a shame. Compound this by trading a handful of bad guys in order to secure the release and it is a terrible deal.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
PRO CHOICE REPUBLICAN
|
|
|
12-18-2018, 12:34 PM
|
#6
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,434
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sea Dangles
This is a discussion where you said you were waiting for a positive action from Trump. I provided the example of bringing home our fallen servicemen ,which took many years as well as many administrations to accomplish. You trivialized it.....wonder why
No I said it was not special it’s expected was it positive yes
Not sure why the rights need to wave Pom poms when Trump does
Positive when it should have been done regardless
Wrong party is my guess.
You proceeded by smearing the accomplishment by bringing NK into the discussion despite insisting it is our duty to bring home all of our men regardless.
You don’t follow we’ll you brought up dealing with terroist .. but no issue dealing with Kim Wrong party right
A dizzying display of partisanship. Yes we are obligated to bring them all back. Yes it was a bad deal to bring back this deserter,we lost 6 good men bringing back a soldier who turned his back on his comrades,such a shame. Compound this by trading a handful of bad guys in order to secure the release and it is a terrible deal.
So you do want to pick and choose who comes home and uninformed to boot
https://www.stripes.com/news/command...gdahl-1.402016
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
12-18-2018, 12:54 PM
|
#7
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 8,718
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
If you read enough about it you will find varying accounts regarding the loss of troops looking for the deserter.
Congratulations 🎉, you said something nice about our President.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
PRO CHOICE REPUBLICAN
|
|
|
12-18-2018, 10:58 AM
|
#8
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 7,725
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by wdmso
And I never compared him to the fallen .. you clearly. Have “ to compare the two is laughable “ so let’s get back discussions You brought the Korean remains into the conversation and bergdahl not I
So as I said it it the duty of any sitting potus to do whatever he can do to bring home any Americans home regardless if they died In combat or not .. it’s not debatable
All service members their families and the nation must have no doubts and have confidence that USA will do what’s required to bring every one home..
once home if actions of individuals were unlawful in the eyes of the UCMJ that’s when it gets resolved.
The perception of UCMJ violations should not delay attempts at repatriation ..
Clearly you feel it was wrong of Obama to make the deal for berghdal
But no issues with Trump dealing with Kim to have those remains returned
You made the comparison sacrifice good deal / deserter bad deal
It’s very clear
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
I really want to stay out of your pissing match, but I didn't realize we sacrificed something to have the remains returned.
And, personally, I would rather we go get our captured soldier, using whatever force, "whatever he can do to bring home" as you put it, than to trade for some who have murdered us and let them be free to do so again.
|
|
|
|
12-18-2018, 12:19 PM
|
#9
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Somerset MA
Posts: 9,434
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by detbuch
I really want to stay out of your pissing match, but I didn't realize we sacrificed something to have the remains returned.
And, personally, I would rather we go get our captured soldier, using whatever force, "whatever he can do to bring home" as you put it, than to trade for some who have murdered us and let them be free to do so again.
|
Who said we sacrificed anything with North Korea I think they gave the ultimate sacrifice was how it was used
We traded our combatant for their combatants. That’s what happen in combat .. the goal is to kill the enemy
You call them murders what do you think we are to them?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Rate This Thread |
Hybrid Mode
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:28 AM.
|
| |