New emails show FBI agents leaked info designed to hurt Trump

[Got Stripers]

Context is not clear and anyone can cherry pick from text, emails and verbal conversations and make something sound completely different. Not sure I’m buying into s state news and Trump efforts to devert attention from one of his worst weeks. Not only that, while Hillary made a number of admitted mistakes that cost her the election, are you forgetting the October Comey final nail in her coffin. If the FBI wanted to hurt Trump that was a funny way to go about it just before the election.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[spence]

Originally Posted by Got Stripers

If the FBI wanted to hurt Trump that was a funny way to go about it just before the election.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

If Strozk wanted to hurt Trump wouldn't he have leaked that the FBI had Trump's campaign under investigation???

Another conspiracy theory of Jim's falling apart. He's read too much Fox.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by spence

If Strozk wanted to hurt Trump wouldn't he have leaked that the FBI had Trump's campaign under investigation???

Another conspiracy theory of Jim's falling apart. He's read too much Fox.

Sweeping it under the rug? Get outta here.

[Jim in CT]

Originally Posted by Got Stripers

Context is not clear and anyone can cherry pick from text, emails and verbal conversations and make something sound completely different. Not sure I’m buying into s state news and Trump efforts to devert attention from one of his worst weeks. Not only that, while Hillary made a number of admitted mistakes that cost her the election, are you forgetting the October Comey final nail in her coffin. If the FBI wanted to hurt Trump that was a funny way to go about it just before the election.
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

When Strzok and his mistress were (1) investigating the Hilary email situation, (2) investigating the Trump campaign, and (3) texting that "they would stop" Trump from becoming President, how many ways can you interpret that? A lot of different ways? In how many ways were they in a position to alter a national election? Do you think they meant that they were each going to donate $50 to the Hilary campaign? Do you think they meant that they would each put a Hilary sign on their lawns? Would either one of those actions have put them in a singular position to significantly alter the election? Or could they have only done that, by putting their thumbs on the scales during the very important, high-level investigations?

[spence]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

When Strzok and his mistress were (1) investigating the Hilary email situation, (2) investigating the Trump campaign, and (3) texting that "they would stop" Trump from becoming President, how many ways can you interpret that? A lot of different ways? In how many ways were they in a position to alter a national election? Do you think they meant that they were each going to donate $50 to the Hilary campaign? Do you think they meant that they would each put a Hilary sign on their lawns? Would either one of those actions have put them in a singular position to significantly alter the election? Or could they have only done that, by putting their thumbs on the scales during the very important, high-level investigations?

Jim, can you name one thing Strzok is shown to of actually done to hurt Trump or help Clinton...one thing.

[Got Stripers]

Originally Posted by Jim in CT

When Strzok and his mistress were (1) investigating the Hilary email situation, (2) investigating the Trump campaign, and (3) texting that "they would stop" Trump from becoming President, how many ways can you interpret that? A lot of different ways? In how many ways were they in a position to alter a national election? Do you think they meant that they were each going to donate $50 to the Hilary campaign? Do you think they meant that they would each put a Hilary sign on their lawns? Would either one of those actions have put them in a singular position to significantly alter the election? Or could they have only done that, by putting their thumbs on the scales during the very important, high-level investigations?

Again who is "THEY" is that the FBI, or was it referring to the voting public, is it congress, that one cherry picked statement without a long list of full text and supporting conversations proves absolutely nothing. Anyone cherry picking and posting bits and pieces is using it for a reason, what might that be?