Rhode Island under attack

[wdmso]

Proposed Law Could Mean No More Free Porn In Rhode IslandState

legislators introduced a bill last week that would require residents to pay a one-time $20 fee to access pornography sites or other "offensive material" online.

easier to get a gun then a Hard on

[JohnR]

You have to wait 7 days for a Stiffy?

[Pete F.]

Originally Posted by JohnR

You have to wait 7 days for a Stiffy?

Just wait a few years
The blue pill will be your friend
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[Slipknot]

You can joke about the stupid laws these idiots want passed, but in Washington state the first victim of a so called "red flag" bill has lost his constitutional rights because some snowflake was scared of him. No charges, no crime, nothing, yet he lost his guns with no due process, no chance to defend himself.
"We're from the government and we are here to help"

[RIROCKHOUND]

Originally Posted by Slipknot

You can joke about the stupid laws these idiots want passed, but in Washington state the first victim of a so called "red flag" bill has lost his constitutional rights because some snowflake was scared of him. No charges, no crime, nothing, yet he lost his guns with no due process, no chance to defend himself.
"We're from the government and we are here to help"

That’s exactly what Don-in-chief said he wanted, isn’t it?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

[wdmso]

Originally Posted by Slipknot

You can joke about the stupid laws these idiots want passed, but in Washington state the first victim of a so called "red flag" bill has lost his constitutional rights because some snowflake was scared of him. No charges, no crime, nothing, yet he lost his guns with no due process, no chance to defend himself.
"We're from the government and we are here to help"

But many people have no issues with cops shooting and killing unarmed people

Many conservatives try to blame the person shot .. they shouldn't of moved fast , or the cops defense he thought they had a gun or they were in fear for their lives ... where is the due process in that

Apply the reasons police can shoot you . to red flag bill securing your weapons because your a possible threat or fear for others lives .. Conservatives should support the bill

but because it involves guns .. they worry about due process

[scottw]

Originally Posted by wdmso

But many people have no issues with cops shooting and killing unarmed people

[JohnR]

Originally Posted by Slipknot

You can joke about the stupid laws these idiots want passed, but in Washington state the first victim of a so called "red flag" bill has lost his constitutional rights because some snowflake was scared of him. No charges, no crime, nothing, yet he lost his guns with no due process, no chance to defend himself.
"We're from the government and we are here to help"

There are some people that should not have access to a firearm and they needs to be some mechanism in place to remove firearms when someone is extremely dangerous with a potential to user them HOWEVER there also needs to hard and predefined limits to how this can be used and for rights to be restored. Due process must be adhered to.

Originally Posted by RIROCKHOUND

That’s exactly what Don-in-chief said he wanted, isn’t it?
Posted from my iPhone/Mobile device

He talks out of both sides of his mouth like many children

Originally Posted by wdmso

But many people have no issues with cops shooting and killing unarmed people

Many conservatives try to blame the person shot .. they shouldn't of moved fast , or the cops defense he thought they had a gun or they were in fear for their lives ... where is the due process in that

Huh? Most cops shooting people are doing so as a result of a dangerous / illegal activity in process. Most times it is justified, unfortunate, but justified. Very few cases are determined that the LEO was at fault thought it does happen too much.

Originally Posted by wdmso

Apply the reasons police can shoot you . to red flag bill securing your weapons because your a possible threat or fear for others lives .. Conservatives should support the bill

but because it involves guns .. they worry about due process

Huh? Your explanations for most things aligns with this newer several decade trend of lack of logic which is why I am no longer a Dem.

You would think that important items such as rights and liberty would be more universal and held in better regard across all political spectrum - and that the difference would be how to address the faults in the system to make it better so that it applies fair opportunity to all. But no - the left is trying to bring down the system. Maybe everyone on the left does not realize it but the useful idiots will follow along.

I believe your right to speak shall not be infringed.
I believe your right to protect yourself and your family shall not be infringed.
I believe your right to prevent improper search and seizure shall not be infringed.
I believe your right to speedy and fair trial speak shall not be infringed.
I believe your right to speak shall not be infringed.

Where are the problems with these items??

Originally Posted by scottw

I know

[Slipknot]

Originally Posted by wdmso

But many people have no issues with cops shooting and killing unarmed people

What people have no issue? the cops? get real

Many conservatives try to blame the person shot .. they shouldn't of moved fast , or the cops defense he thought they had a gun or they were in fear for their lives ... where is the due process in that Are you serious with that question? so in a split second decision you think they are going to stop, get a warrant from a judge,
then continue? I live in reality. The due process I was referring to has to do with some simpleton calling police on a man they thought was a threat because he was armed and looked at them, now on the other hand we have if the armed guy was a Muslim, everyone would be afraid to call about their suspicious behavior for fear of being charged with harassment or some nonsense and the result is San Bernadino.

Apply the reasons police can shoot you . to red flag bill securing your weapons because your a possible threat or fear for others lives .. Conservatives should support the bill

but because it involves guns .. they worry about due process it is focused on due process whether it is a car being taken away from a drunk for the reason he doesn't use it to drive drunk and possibly kill someone. Try to think logically and blame the morality of the person breaking the law, not the possession of an object

It is obvious we don't want guns in the hands of unstable people, so if there is actual evidence present other than someone's accusation, then investigate it and allow the person to defend the red flag. Why is that so difficult.